> "Justin" == Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If we cannot reproduce this, it will be quite hard to find out
>> what is happening :(
Justin> Steps to reproduce:
What happens if you set:
export DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer
first?
Is it possible that there is something wr
Package: preload
Version: 0.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 6.1
When installing preload:
Setting up preload (0.2-5) ...
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute post-installation script: Exec format error
dpkg: error processing preload (--configure):
subprocess post-installat
Both #356829 and #357765 are caused by a bug in libsub-uplevel-perl. I
have tested applying the patch included in #363009 and both packages
start to compile correctly
--
Martín Ferrari
Package: libsub-uplevel-perl
Version: 0.09-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
The unexpected verbosity of this package is responsible for #356829,
which is a RC bug. As it's used in test cases where the output is
searched for warnings and errors.
It seems that this bug spawned with a fix in the warn
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:40:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:53:00PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:22:29PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote:
> > > Package: buici-clock
> > > Version: 0.4.5+b1
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders pac
Sorry, one of the patches had a mistake.
--
Martín Ferrari
diff -Naur libtest-class-perl-0.11-new/debian/control libtest-class-perl-0.11-newdebian/debian/control
--- libtest-class-perl-0.11-new/debian/control 2006-04-15 01:30:27.0 -0300
+++ libtest-class-perl-0.11-newdebian/debian/control
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:53:00PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:22:29PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote:
> > Package: buici-clock
> > Version: 0.4.5+b1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > After last upgrade of the X system, buici-clock got remov
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:02:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362524: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:09:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > dpkg: error processing amavisd-new (--purge):
> > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 128
>
> Exit status 128 is an unusual return status. Moreover,
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:58:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default
fixed font
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:22:29PM -0400, Patricio Rojo wrote:
> Package: buici-clock
> Version: 0.4.5+b1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After last upgrade of the X system, buici-clock got removed. When trying
> to reinstall it, I get the following message...
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
At Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:36:39 +0200,
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 04:52:28PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > I noticed maintainer's cron script at osdn.d.o.j had stopped
> > since a long time ago by wrong permission.
> >
> > I fi
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:51:22PM -0400, Ian B. MacDonald wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.12
> Followup-For: Bug #362891
> bash~# dpkg --configure --pending
> Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
> + set -e
> + . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
> ++ '[' '!' '' ']'
> ++ PERL_DL_NONLA
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 03:25:55AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo discover --disable-all --enable=pci --format="%V
> %M\t%S\t%D\n" video
> discover: unrecognized option `--disable-all'
> usage: discover [--bus-summary] [OPTIONS] [BUS [...]]
>discover --type-summary
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> - (to the maintainers) is there anything new in the templates that could
> cause a parse failure?
Here is what I see after much beating to get sensible sh -x output:
+ which discover
++ discover_video
++ which discover
+++ discover --disable-a
Package: buici-clock
Version: 0.4.5+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After last upgrade of the X system, buici-clock got removed. When trying
to reinstall it, I get the following message...
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
buici-clock: Depends: libice6
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:15:03AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > I just ran across this and tried that - it dies right after sourcing the
> > debconf confmodule - debconf's exec line to restart the scripts exit's
> > 64.
>
> Thanks, that's pr
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:37:53PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Brian May wrote:
> > > "Justin" == Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Justin> amavisd fails to purge. This line fails:
> > Justin> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
> >
>
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:49:59PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:09:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > dpkg: error processing amavisd-new (--purge):
> > > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:15:03AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
> > > Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
> > > messages:
> > > Setting up xserve
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:09:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > dpkg: error processing amavisd-new (--purge):
> > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 128
> Exit status 128 is an unusual return status. Moreover, de
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.1.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #361024
Although not reflected in the config below, the packages at
http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/
resolved this problem for me, which was killing things like gnucash in Xen
environments regarless of the location of /lib/tls
thanks,
iMa
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> dpkg: error processing amavisd-new (--purge):
> subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 128
Exit status 128 is an unusual return status. Moreover, debconf should never
return it. WTF? 129 would be killed by SIGHUP, but 128 has no de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> tags 358759 + patch
Bug#358759: screem: FTBFS: compile error: 'GNOME_PARAM_POPT_TABLE' undeclared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:24 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint
> > > after all.
> >
> > AIUI, the non
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 360713 patch
Bug#360713: etc/init.d/and stop does not stop and
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thank
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
bts tags + patch 358759
thanks
I've attached a patch that uses the GOption API instead of the
deprecated Popt API. This allows screem to build with newer versions
of GNOME.
--
hanna m. wallach
blog: http://join-the-dots.org/
work: http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/hmw26/
--- screem-main.c.OLD
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362891
bash~# dpkg --configure --pending
Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
+ set -e
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ '[' '' ']'
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend
/va
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Brian May wrote:
> > "Justin" == Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Justin> amavisd fails to purge. This line fails:
> Justin> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
>
> What is the error you get?
And do you have debconf* packages installed? Which ones?
--
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Gran said:
> This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> > > Package: xserver-xorg
> > > Version: 1:7.0.12
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
Hi:
I'm attaching a patch that solves this issue in the init script.
I'm aware that it is not the best solution, it would be better that
the program would write the pidfile on its own, but i think this is
an upstream problem.
Besides, the last packaged version is 1.2.1, and last upstream
vers
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:09:43AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Justin" == Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Justin> amavisd fails to purge. This line fails:
> Justin> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
>
> What is the error you get?
I tried briefly to debug it, but since I'
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#355824: fixed in freebirth 0.3.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xorg
> > Version: 1:7.0.12
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
>
> > upgrading to xorg-xserver version 7.0.12 broke my system
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
> > Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
> > messages:
>
> > Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
> > dpkg: error processing xserver-xorg (--configu
> "Justin" == Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Justin> amavisd fails to purge. This line fails:
Justin> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
What is the error you get?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:18:44PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> It was not from an official package. And it was a symlink, so dealing
> with it is a bit more complicated. Anyhow, I wonder what exactly do we
> win by trying to remove this directory. What is the problem with just
> letting where it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362940 serious
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fixed font
Severity set to `serious'.
> tags 362940 -moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fixed font
Tags were: unreproduci
Package: libswt3.1-gtk-java
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: grave
libswt3.1-gtk-java only holds the symlinks to the real files, which
are in eclipse-rcp.
$ ls -l /usr/lib/java
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 58 Apr 16 23:44 swt-3.1.jar ->
../eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_3.1.1.jar
lrwx
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:10:24PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > By the way, the dpkg-reconfigure spit out the following error
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info/x11-common.postinst: line 918: [: too many arguments
> > [this is x11-common 7.0.12]. If this isn't part of the "bug or two"
> > that you are
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362704: fixed in openam 1.1.18+20050304-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:32:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362705: fixed in openmcu 2.1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.12
Severity: serious
The x11-common preinst script sources /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
unconditionally, but x11-common does not pre-depend on debconf. Since
debconf is not Essential, this is an RC bug.
I suspect that the only use of db_* in x11-common.preinst
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:32:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362707: fixed in t38modem 0.8.0+20050304-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:32:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362706: fixed in pstngw 1.3.1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
reassign 362940 x11-common 1:7.0.11
severity 362940 normal
tags 362940 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:14:33PM +0200, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.12
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> upgrading to xorg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 362940 x11-common 1:7.0.11
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fixed font
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `x11-common'.
> severity 362940 normal
Bug#362940: Latest update broke gdm and can't find default fi
On Thursday 13 April 2006 15:30, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I set the severity of this bug to grave, because the package is
> unusable.
This bug is due to libcommoncpp2 changing sonames.
The new libcommoncpp2 is currently sitting in NEW.
Once this has been accepted, then a rebuild of libccrtp and twin
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:26:40AM +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote:
> Package xserver-xorg fails to install on my system with the following
> messages:
> Setting up xserver-xorg (7.0.12) ...
> dpkg: error processing xserver-xorg (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exi
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362891
Well, I was hoping to diff the xserver.org.postinst between the .10 and
.12 releases.. but dpkg -x doesn't extract these files from my old .10
.deb in my apt cache.
I thought it might help to note I received both a failure on the
p
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 03:35:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> reopen 362931
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:32:13AM -0700, Francois Gurin wrote:
> >* New upstream release (Closes: #348324).
> >* Rebuild. (Closes: #362931).
>
> Did you bother to look at why x11-common conflict
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 362931
Bug#362931: xvkbd: conflict with x11-common (1:7.0.12). unable to install
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
reopen 362931
thanks
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:32:13AM -0700, Francois Gurin wrote:
>* New upstream release (Closes: #348324).
>* Rebuild. (Closes: #362931).
Did you bother to look at why x11-common conflicts with xvkbd? The xvkbd
package you just uploaded is still installing to /usr/X
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:40:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362228: file-roller: segfaults on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 15:23:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362898: libgnutls-dev: cannot link against libgnutls13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362924 normal
Bug#362924: xorg 7 breaks kdm
Severity set to `normal'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 356761 + fixed
Bug#356761: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Subject: briquolo: crashes on i386, too
Followup-For: Bug #362897
Package: briquolo
Version: 0.5.5-1
Hello,
I get this this crash on i386, but I don't know if is the same issue,
'though.
$ briquolo
BRIQUOLO v0.5.5
erreur
Resolution 640x480
Essai r\ufffdsolution : rMask=8 gMask=8 bMask=8 BPP=32
severity 362924 normal
quit
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 04:00:31PM +0200, Arne Anka wrote:
> Package: kdm
> Version: 4:3.5.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> after upgrade to xorg 7 kdm fails to start:
> kdm[15418]: X server "/usr/X11R6/bin/X" cannot be executed
> no wo
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:55:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # missing bug number in the changelog ...
> tag 335145 + fixed
Bug#335145: removal of automake1.6
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:03:15PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I appreciate your prompt reply. I imagine you and the rest of the
> X11-packaging team must be feeling a bit under fire at the moment.
> I'd like to let you know that your efforts are greatly appreciated,
> nonethel
Hi David,
I appreciate your prompt reply. I imagine you and the rest of the
X11-packaging team must be feeling a bit under fire at the moment.
I'd like to let you know that your efforts are greatly appreciated,
nonetheless.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 05:47:43PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> The x
Hi Daniel, hi all!
On Son, 16 Apr 2006, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > - X cannot find the fixed font anymore:
> > The fixed enty in fonts.alias in /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc is not
> > included in the fonts.dir file
[..]
>
> When it gives you that message, it does actually mean it ...
But the font
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:55:13 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:27:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360705: Application does not start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 03:59:10PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> After an upgrade to xorg 1:7.0.12, I was left with one file in
> /usr/X11R6/bin: xearth. I subsequently discovered that xearth is
> "non-free". Possibly you missed all the non-free package conflicts?
>
>
> So I removed xearth,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 354650 + unreproducible
Bug#354650: lightspeed: segfault at start up on amd64
Tags were: help
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:04:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362265: fixed in madwifi 0.svn20060207-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 276598 + fixed
Bug#276598: dchroot to RedHat system
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 360600 + fixed
Bug#360600: dchroot: chroot(".") fails with ENOPERM
Tags were: patch
Bug#360604: dchroot broken due to recent changes in "su"
Tags ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 362534 -1
Bug#362534: fontconfig: preremoval script runs a program whose shared libs are
not available
Bug 362534 cloned as bug 362975.
> severity -1 normal
Bug#362975: fontconfig: preremoval script runs a program whose shared libs are
not avai
uploaded in delayed/2 with urgency set to high.
I just applied the patch mentioned twice on the BTS.
Cheers,
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpFztI59N1Yb.pgp
D
tag 354650 + unreproducible
thanks
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 07:32:55AM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> To me this backtrace looks like it has to do with gtk... It is a bit
> strange that it work on i386 but not on amd64...
>
> As I do not have access to a amd64 machine I need help with debug
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 14:04:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362839: fixed in spampd 2.30-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> # downgraded without rationale , package may be broken on powerpc
> severity 362897 grave
Bug#362897: briquolo: SIGSEGV on startup
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stoppin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> package madwifi madwifi-dev madwifi-source madwifi-tools
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: madwifi-source madwifi-tools madwifi-dev madwifi
> tags 362265 + pending
Bug#362265: madwifi:
After an upgrade to xorg 1:7.0.12, I was left with one file in
/usr/X11R6/bin: xearth. I subsequently discovered that xearth is
"non-free". Possibly you missed all the non-free package conflicts?
So I removed xearth, and /usr/X11R6/bin went away. X wouldn't start
because nothing could now be f
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:59:31 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug already fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:42:32AM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried running Firefox under gdb to figure out what's wrong, and it
> just died with an internal error. Luckily, Ubuntu has an unreleased gdb
> snapshot packaged, so Fabio Massimo Di Nitto was able to trace the crash
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> tags 361749 upstream
Bug#361749: /etc/init.d/shishid doesn't go to background
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:51:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339056: rename source package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Apr 16, Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point was that, since udev usually manipulates /dev, and network
> devices don't show up in /dev, udev manipulations might not help with
> problems involving the names of network devices.
Please do not try to explain how udev works to the udev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362966 normal
Bug#362966: nscd aborts
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks,
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:59:59AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:23:26AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > The handling of ethernet devices seems to be unusual in that there are
> > entries for them in /sys but not, as far as I can tell, in /dev (by
> > default, anyway).
>
> That'
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:31:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362800: debian-installer: cd-rom installer requires online
repository
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> reassign 362107 gnome-control-center
Bug#362107: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev crashes gnome-settings-daemon
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-input-evdev' to
`gnome-contro
severity 362966 normal
thanks,
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and *not* to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I've not yet pulled the source, but I may've found the problem...
the administrator id (from Samba) was somehow assigned a low uid,
one that was in
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 11:23:26AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> The handling of ethernet devices seems to be unusual in that there are
> entries for them in /sys but not, as far as I can tell, in /dev (by
> default, anyway).
That's the Unix way, network devices never show up in /dev. This has
noth
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.12
Followup-For: Bug #362940
Since last upgrade, I can't start Xorg. I got these messages :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# X
X Window System Version 7.0.0
Release Date: 21 December 2005
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.0
Build Operating System:Linux 2.6.1
Package: nscd
Version: 2.3.6-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
25899: provide access to FD 4, for passwd
25899: handle_request: request received (Version = 2) from PID 26604
25899: GETFDGR
25899: provide access to FD 6, for group
25899: Reloading "administrator" in passwo
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:40:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing as invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Hi,
I've tried running Firefox under gdb to figure out what's wrong, and it
just died with an internal error. Luckily, Ubuntu has an unreleased gdb
snapshot packaged, so Fabio Massimo Di Nitto was able to trace the crash
there to NSGetModuleI() function, called from libgtklayout. Unfortunately
Your message dated Sun, 16 Apr 2006 11:32:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362931: fixed in xvkbd 2.7a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:41:41AM +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
Package: xprint
Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
xprint: Depends: libice6 but it is not going to be installed
Hello Steve,
* Steve M. Robbins [Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:39:49PM -0400]:
> For the record: a simple rebuild allowed my CGAL programs
> to work again.
>
> I suppose that we'll have to use a versioned requires on mpfr
> or a versioned conflicts on gmp to ensure that incompatible
> packages cannot b
severity 362488 important
tag 362488 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi Ryan,
Ryan Murray [2006-04-13 11:10 -0700]:
> Removing postgresql-8.1 ...
> /etc/init.d/postgresql-8.1: line 3:
> /usr/share/postgresql-common/init.d-functions: No such file or directory
> invoke-rc.d: initscript postgresql-8
Package: prelude-manager
Severity: serious
Hi
When I tried to fix the other RC bug by removing the build dependencies
on libmysqlclient14-dev and postgresql-dev, your package failed to build
with the following error:
checking for libprelude-config... /usr/bin/libprelude-config
checking for libpr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362488 important
Bug#362488: fails to purge
Severity set to `important'.
> tag 362488 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#362488: fails to purge
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please c
The handling of ethernet devices seems to be unusual in that there are
entries for them in /sys but not, as far as I can tell, in /dev (by
default, anyway).
Another thing that might be causing trouble is that the ethernet
device seems to be spread out among several devices as reported by
udevinfo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 362897 normal
Bug#362897: briquolo: SIGSEGV on startup
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
