Processed: tagging 305411

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 305411 patch Bug#305411: cal3d: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/share/doc/libcal3d-doc/html/functions_rela.html': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags

Processed: your mail

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 302711 normal Bug#302711: plib: FTBFS: linker error Severity set to `normal'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UN

Bug#304951: marked as done (ruby-gnome2: FTBFS on sarge: configure error.)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:07:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ruby-gnome2: FTBFS on sarge: configure error. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#298930: marked as done (tulip: contains non-free fonts)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:22 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298930: fixed in tulip 2.0.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 303085, closing 303085

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > tags 303085 - sarge Bug#303085: [Fixed in sid] Brown paper bag bugs Tags were: pending patch sarge Tags removed: sarge > # 1.4.3-4 in testing > close 303085 Bug#303085: [Fixed in si

Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format

2005-04-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
reassign 301455 initrd-tools severity 303281 important merge 301455 303281 thanks At Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:13:54 +0300, George Cristian Birzan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:44:12PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > sed -n 's/.*\(=>\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p' > > > > > > > Some

Bug#301356: marked as done (FTBFS because of nspr dependency)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:00:10 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Processed: Re: Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 301455 initrd-tools Bug#301455: ldd no longer puts a => before /bin/ld-linux.so.2 Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `initrd-tools'. > severity 303281 important Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed outpu

Bug#306575: marked as done (mozilla-mailnews: XML Parsing error when starting mailnews)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:27:53 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line not bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#305411: Let's only install what's built

2005-04-27 Thread Stephen Gran
Attached is a patch that only tries to install what's actually built. You probably also want to build-depend on docbook-utils, as configure looks for it and emits a warning if it's not found. -- -- | Stephen Gran

Bug#305894: marked as done (rsplib: FTBFS on sarge: configure: error: No sctplib installation found (/usr/lib/libsctp.a)!)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:01:45 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line rsplib: FTBFS on sarge: configure: error: No sctplib installation found (/usr/lib/libsctp.a)! has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: severity of 306692 is important, tagging 306692

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > severity 306692 important Bug#306692: evolution: Evolution 2.0.4-1 Crashes During Startup Severity set to `important'. > tags 306692 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#306692: evolution: Ev

Processed: closing 300440, tagging 300440

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 > close 300440 Bug#300440: post-installation returns error code 21 if /usr/share/doc/menu/html does not exist 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. B

Bug#306692: evolution: Evolution 2.0.4-1 Crashes During Startup

2005-04-27 Thread John Wenger
Package: evolution Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-03 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (char

Bug#303070: marked as done (libdbd-sqlite-perl: FTBFS: Cannot open 'SQLite2.xsi': No such file or directory in SQLite2.xs, line 69)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:49:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#283896: marked as done (libdbd-sqlite-perl: version mismatch with sqlite package.)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:49:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#306595: Bug #306595 - tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

2005-04-27 Thread browaeys . alban
Followup for : http://bugs.debian.org/306595 i fixed the jadetex upgrade with fmtutil --all iso i looks like some remains from old experimental/woody or who knows. Though xmltex seems really broken. Cheers Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Processed: Re: Bug#306673: kde-devel-extras install fails!

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 306673 kdesdk-misc Bug#306673: kde-devel-extras install fails! Bug reassigned from package `kde-devel-extras' to `kdesdk-misc'. > severity 306673 serious Bug#306673: kde-devel-extras install fails! Severity set to `serious'. > tag 306673 expe

Processed: severity of 306677 is important

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 306677 important Bug#306677: libc6: /lib64 goes away on upgrade, breaks amd64 Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#306666: marked as done (kdelibs3-crypto: Package is not installable)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#30: kdelibs3-crypto: Package is not installable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#306677: libc6: /lib64 goes away on upgrade, breaks amd64

2005-04-27 Thread Matt Taggart
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Severity: critical Justification: causes amd64 systems to become completely unusable upon dist-upgrade A person I know ran into a critical bug on amd64 today. He was apt-get dist-upgrading his system things broke horribly, ... Get:171 http://debian-amd64.al

Bug#306577: postfix-tls: Unable to install package with postfix due to unsatisfied dependency

2005-04-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Khushil Dep wrote: > Package: postfix-tls > Version: unstable-latest Please provide the real version number here; there is no longer a postfix-tls package in unstable. > Why trying to install postfix-tls it reports that the wrong mySql version > is instal

Bug#230677: rc bug #230677 for package phpdoc

2005-04-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:16:04AM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > What can be done for bug #230677? It was a year since an NMU was done > (march 2004). The problem is fixed. > But since it was fixed by the NMU, it's still open as RC bug, and the > package won't go to sarge. > I think the bug should

Processed: severity of 306673 is minor

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 306673 minor Bug#306673: kde-devel-extras install fails! Severity set to `minor'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#306607: marked as done (kdebase-crypto: Package is not installable)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:05:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306607: kdebase-crypto: Package is not installable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#306673: kde-devel-extras install fails!

2005-04-27 Thread Bastian Venthur
Package: kde-devel-extras Version: 5:45 Severity: grave Trying to install kde-devel-extras 3.4pre1 fails! Here is a (sorry only in german) install-log: *** (Lese Datenbank ... 108324 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit

Bug#297612: marked as done (revelation: Revelation stopped to work after upgrade)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:47:16 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297612: fixed in revelation 0.4.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#306596: marked as done (pja: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'jikes')

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:32:22 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306596: fixed in pja 2.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#302711: plib: FTBFS: linker error

2005-04-27 Thread Philipp Frauenfelder
severity 302711 normal thanks Hi Am Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 04:10:21PM +0200 hat Roland Stigge getippert: > building the package plib in a clean sid build environment > (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: > > = > [...] > make[2

Bug#306666: kdelibs3-crypto: Package is not installable

2005-04-27 Thread Paolo Marzucco
Package: kdelibs3-crypto Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package is not installable at all, since it's relative to an old version of KDE (2.2), probably the same as in woody. We miss kdelibs3-crypto for current KDE version in sarge. -- System Information: Debian Re

Bug#230677: rc bug #230677 for package phpdoc

2005-04-27 Thread Lior Kaplan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, What can be done for bug #230677? It was a year since an NMU was done (march 2004). The problem is fixed. But since it was fixed by the NMU, it's still open as RC bug, and the package won't go to sarge. I think the bug should be closed. What do

Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a

2005-04-27 Thread Ove Kaaven
ons, 27,.04.2005 kl. 22.38 +0200, skrev Robert Millan: > My take is that nvidia-glx should divert the symlink too. I'm not sure how to > do that cleanly though. It does divert it if you install nvidia-glx-dev. I'd close this bug again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-27 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andreas, Thanks for your bug reports, but you have to know that you can't file FTBFS bugs reports about packages that are in contrib and relay on packages that are not in Debian to build! The non-free JDK's are not officially supported so the pack

Bug#292478: oops on boot with usb cdburner attached

2005-04-27 Thread inkwire
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 093b:0021 Plextor Corp. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVend

Bug#292478: oops on boot with usb cdburner attached

2005-04-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This is the USB controller as reported by lspci: > does lsusb show the usb cdburner? it's output would be nice. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Millan
reopen 306533 reassign 306533 nvidia-glx retitle 306533 causes wine (and probably others) to FTBFS thanks On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:53:04AM -0400, Ove Kaaven wrote: > ons, 27,.04.2005 kl. 10.30 +0200, skrev Robert Millan: > > Package: wine > > Version: 0.0.20041019-1 > > Severity: serious > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 306533 Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 306533 nvidia-glx Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a Bug reassigned from package `wine' to `nvidia-glx'. > retitle 306533 causes wine (and pr

Bug#306647: libgef-java: FTBFS: The java class is not found: org.apache.tools.ant.launch.AntMain

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: libgef-java Version: 0.9.6-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch To build the package in a clean chroot with j2sdk1.4-{sun,ibm,blackdown} installed, I first have to change debian/rules to use the correct JAVA_HOME_DIRS. Then I get the following error: The java class is not found: org.apache

Bug#292478: oops on boot with usb cdburner attached

2005-04-27 Thread inkwire
This is the USB controller as reported by lspci: :00:02.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03) (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) Subsystem: IBM: Unknown device 0540 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11 Memory at e801 (32-bit, non-prefetchabl

Bug#306653: oo2c: ftbfs [sparc] make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

2005-04-27 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: oo2c Version: 1.5.9-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source oo2c fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on sparc pbuilder: if test yes = yes; then \ stage1/oo2c --config oo2crc.stage2 --libtool-cmd /usr/bin/libtool --make-lib --lib-path /usr/l

Bug#269152: culmus: done

2005-04-27 Thread Lior Kaplan
Package: culmus Version: 0.101-2 Followup-For: Bug #269152 "You are more than welcome asking the Debian OOo folks to adopt this fix." Done. See #306642 Hope we make it to sarge... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i38

Bug#306639: batik: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME_DIRS incorrect

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: batik Version: 1.5.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'batik' in a clean chroot with j2sdk1.4-{sun,ibm,blackdown} installed, I get the following error: if test "." != "."; then rmdir .; fi dh_clean You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! make: *** [ant-sanity

Bug#306636: libjcommon-java: FTBFS: ./debian_patch: Permission denied

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: libjcommon-java Version: 0.8.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'libjcommon-java', I get the following error: ./debian_patch jcommon-0.8.3/ant/build.xml make: execvp: ./debian_patch: Permission denied make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127 The attached patch fixes th

Bug#306633: libxalan2-java: FTBFS: Invalid JAVA_HOME_DIRS

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: libxalan2-java Version: 2.6.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'libxalan2-java' in a clean chroot with j2sdk1.4-{sun,ibm,blackdown} installed, I get the following error: make[1]: Leaving directory `/libxalan2-java-2.6.0' rm -f debian/patches/*.log You must specify a v

Bug#305300: followup: this package cannot be distributed at all

2005-04-27 Thread Ron
Hi, For anyone who is following, I've now sent this to ftp-admin for action, since serious licence problems have been discovered, and too many people can't tell the difference between it and something eligible for Sarge. We're very close to a 2.6 release candidate which will hopefully be a more

Bug#306620: ftp.debian.org: Please remove wxwidgets2.5, licence problems

2005-04-27 Thread Ron
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Justification: No permission to distribute Hi, The wxwidgets2.5 source package was due to be removed shortly (in a slightly more orderly fashion) and replaced by the 2.6 release, cf. #305300 Serious problems with the licence of some files in the 2.5.3.2

Bug#306617: statcvs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'junit, libjdom-java'

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: statcvs Version: 20030713-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'statcvs' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following errors: # If upstream make StatCVS port for new jfreechart one day #cp /usr/share/java/jfreechart.jar statcvs-20030713/lib #cp /usr/share/java/jcommon.jar s

Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

2005-04-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > Package: tetex-bin > Version: 3.0-3 > Severity: grave > Tags: experimental > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Hi, > > here is the problem: > > Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-3) ... > Merging information from /etc/texmf/t

Bug#306607: kdebase-crypto: Package is not installable

2005-04-27 Thread Paolo Marzucco
Package: kdebase-crypto Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package is not installable at all, since it's relative to an old version of KDE (2.2), probably the same as in woody. We miss kdebase-crypto for current KDE version in sarge. -- System Information: Debian Relea

Bug#306595: tetex-bin: postinst failure with jadetex and xmltex

2005-04-27 Thread Richard Lewis
"Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > here is the problem: > > Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-3) ... > Merging information from /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ into /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf ... > done > Regenerating /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ... done > Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ..

Bug#306581: amaya: fails to start (Gdk-ERROR)

2005-04-27 Thread Steve Dunham
severity 306581 normal thanks Alexandre B. wrote: Package: amaya Version: 8.5-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable whenever i try to launch the freshly installed amaya package, it just output that kind of error then die : Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid param

Processed: Re: Bug#306581: amaya: fails to start (Gdk-ERROR)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 306581 normal Bug#306581: amaya: fails to start (Gdk-ERROR) Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#300560: [bug #11185] Passwords stored insecurely

2005-04-27 Thread spiralvoice
Update of bug #11185 (project mldonkey): Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

Bug#306596: pja: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'jikes'

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: pja Version: 2.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'pja' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: make[1]: Leaving directory `/pja-2.5' rm -f debian/patches/*.log You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! make: *** [ant-sanity-check] Error 1 When this is

Bug#306546: nscd/libc6: Assertion failed on login/su, any user

2005-04-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
severity 306546 important tags 306546 moreinfo unreproducible thanks At Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:25:12 +0200, Marek Szuba wrote: > My affected box is an AMD Sempron machine with a 2.6 kernel built > for K8 architecture. Having upgraded nscd to 2.3.2.ds1-20 (via > apt-get dist-upgrade) earlier this week

Processed: Re: Bug#306546: nscd/libc6: Assertion failed on login/su, any user

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 306546 important Bug#306546: nscd/libc6: Assertion failed on login/su, any user Severity set to `important'. > tags 306546 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#306546: nscd/libc6: Assertion failed on login/su, any user There were no tags set. Tags adde

Bug#306593: jswat: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'j2sdk1.4'

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: jswat Version: 1.7-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'jswat' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. ant -Dversion=1.7 dist Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads/lib/

Processed: There is no NMU...

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 288331 Bug#288331: libxine1: Won't play ogg/vorbis 1.0 beta 4 files 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#293222: libxine1: Playback of ogm files requires libtheora Bug closed, send any further explanations t

Bug#306589: rhdb-explain: FTBFS: JAVA_HOME is not defined correctly

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: rhdb-explain Version: 2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When trying to build 'rhdb-explain' in a clean chroot with j2sdk1.4 installed, I get the following error: debian/rules build dh_testdir JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j2se/1.4 ant dist Error: JAVA_HOME is not defined correctly. We cannot e

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xine-lib 1.0.1-1

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 288331 + fixed Bug#288331: libxine1: Won't play ogg/vorbis 1.0 beta 4 files There were no tags set. Bug#293222: libxine1: Playback of ogm files requires libtheora Tags added: fixed > tag 292341 + fixed Bug#292341: gxine: "toyour" : typo in welcome

Bug#306581: amaya: fails to start (Gdk-ERROR)

2005-04-27 Thread Alexandre B.
Package: amaya Version: 8.5-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable whenever i try to launch the freshly installed amaya package, it just output that kind of error then die : Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) serial 106 error_code 8 reques

Bug#303896: openscenegraph: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends

2005-04-27 Thread Loic Dachary
Bill Allombert writes: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:26:37AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > > I've fixed the problem and the new package will be uploaded within > > the next 48 hours. Thanks for your help. > > Hello Loic, > > Apparently the arm buildd set the $HOME variable to a

Bug#297980: gnat-gps: kill(-1, SIGINT), additional info

2005-04-27 Thread Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tags 297980 -help tags 297980 +pending thanks Jan Nordholz writes: > Removing the "#ifdef pfa" around the return value check should fix > the problem, although that's likely only mending the symptoms, not > the cause: The code in question has no support whatsoever for the > case that the ioctl()ed

Bug#306577: postfix-tls: Unable to install package with postfix due to unsatisfied dependency

2005-04-27 Thread Khushil Dep
Package: postfix-tls Version: unstable-latest Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap

Bug#306575: mozilla-mailnews: XML Parsing error when starting mailnews

2005-04-27 Thread Aaron Birenboim
Package: mozilla-mailnews Version: 2:1.7.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just did an upgrade yesterday (4/26/05) to debian testing. mozilla runs, but when I try to open a news window I get a popup with the following message: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed Locatio

Processed: Re: Bug#297980: gnat-gps: kill(-1, SIGINT), additional info

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297980 -help Bug#297980: gnat-gps: causes the X server to crash when compiling Tags were: help Tags removed: help > tags 297980 +pending Bug#297980: gnat-gps: causes the X server to crash when compiling There were no tags set. Tags added: pending

Bug#303774: marked as done (approx: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ocaml-tools')

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:21:49 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line approx now build-depends on ocaml-tools has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#304951: 0.12.0-2 builds

2005-04-27 Thread Andres Salomon
Tested on amd64, 0.12.0-2 (along w/ libgda2-dev from sid) build in a sarge chroot. -- Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#303760: marked as done (syslog-ocaml: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch')

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:26:56 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line syslog-ocaml now build-depends on dpatch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#306562: gs-esp exits abnormally on startup

2005-04-27 Thread Zeeshan Ali
Package: gs-esp Version: 7.07.1-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When i try to start gs-esp or gs (which is a link to gs-esp), it exits abnormally saying: "GNU Ghostscript 7.07: Can't find initialization file gs_init.ps." -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT

Bug#306533: marked as done (FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:53:04 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a

2005-04-27 Thread Ove Kaaven
ons, 27,.04.2005 kl. 10.30 +0200, skrev Robert Millan: > Package: wine > Version: 0.0.20041019-1 > Severity: serious > > Fails to build from source: > > [...] > checking for XF86VidModeQueryExtension in -lXxf86vm... yes > checking for XRenderSetPictureTransform in -lXrender... yes > configure: er

Bug#303896: openscenegraph: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends

2005-04-27 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:26:37AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: > > I've fixed the problem and the new package will be uploaded within > the next 48 hours. Thanks for your help. Hello Loic, Apparently the arm buildd set the $HOME variable to an incorrect value and that break the build of o

Bug#278495: libglib1.2-dev: Upgrade to sarge fails

2005-04-27 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:28:38AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > This bug has the severity "serious" which is "release critical" and no > comment since month which is definetly too long :) Nobody knows what to say to it :/ > In the bug logs I see some proposals regarding the perl dependencies

Bug#260808: still experiencing problems with avifile-player?

2005-04-27 Thread Jon Dowland
Eric Shubert wrote: > If the original submitter cannot reproduce it either, or is no longer > reachable, you can close the bug. On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:44:50PM +0530, Ajay Narottam Shah wrote: > Unfortunately, I've switched to OS X on a ibook, so I'm not able to > carry this forward. Thanks for

Bug#286023: marked as done (samba: Integer overflow could lead to remote code execution in Samba)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 03:48:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Integer overflow could lead to remote code execution in Samba has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sudo 1.6.8p7-1.1

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 305735 + fixed Bug#305735: /usr/bin/sudoedit links to debian/sudo/usr/bin/sudo Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#306546: nscd/libc6: Assertion failed on login/su, any user

2005-04-27 Thread Marek Szuba
Package: nscd Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable My affected box is an AMD Sempron machine with a 2.6 kernel built for K8 architecture. Having upgraded nscd to 2.3.2.ds1-20 (via apt-get dist-upgrade) earlier this week I found myself unable to log in loca

Bug#305735: /usr/bin/sudoedit links to debian/sudo/usr/bin/sudo

2005-04-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Bdale, I've prepared an NMU for this bug which will be uploaded shortly. The diff is attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u sudo-1.6.8p7/config.guess sudo-1.6.8p7/config.guess --- sudo-1.6.8p7/config.guess +++ sudo-1.6.8p7/config.guess @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ #! /bin/sh

Bug#269152: reduce the bug sevirity

2005-04-27 Thread Baruch Even
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Since there's a workaround, what do you think on reducing the sevirity of this bug report. This will allow clumus 0.101-2 to get into sarge. Since this is a real functionality issue and we want OOo to work out of the box without the user needing anything special to

Bug#297980: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from gnat-gps

2005-04-27 Thread Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As noted previously, the X server does not crash, it exists voluntarily. The cause for this is now known to be that gnat-gps calls kill (-1, SIGINT) which kills the user's session. See #297980 for more details. -- Ludovic Brenta.

Bug#306534: FTBFS in experimental

2005-04-27 Thread Andreas Barth
Package: octave2.9 Version: 2.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=octave2.9 for the full build log Cheers, Andi Automatic build of octave2.9_2.9.2-1 on zx6000 by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 Build started at 20050427-

Bug#306533: FTBFS: conflict with libGL.a

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Millan
Package: wine Version: 0.0.20041019-1 Severity: serious Fails to build from source: [...] checking for XF86VidModeQueryExtension in -lXxf86vm... yes checking for XRenderSetPictureTransform in -lXrender... yes configure: error: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a is present on your system. This prevents linkin

Bug#305254: marked as done (cvs: Several security issues in CVS)

2005-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2005 03:47:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305254: fixed in cvs 1:1.12.9-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#260808: still experiencing problems with avifile-player?

2005-04-27 Thread Ajay Narottam Shah
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:22:48PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > Hi, on Jul 22 2004 you filed a bug against the avifile-player package in > debian. This report can be found here: . > > It would be very helpful if you could try playing your file again with a > recent ve