On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:28:38AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > This bug has the severity "serious" which is "release critical" and no > comment since month which is definetly too long :)
Nobody knows what to say to it :/ > In the bug logs I see some proposals regarding the perl dependencies > and Frank's last mail which suggests that the problem is probably fixed > but not yet confirmed as such. No, it is not fixed AFAIK and there were objections to the proposal of changing the dependencies (e.g. by vorlon, IIRC)... > I'm not sure how to do that but I just created a woody chroot, installed > libglib1.2-dev and then dist-upgraded to sarge. Worked fine at least. :) > If I have to confirm a more special scenario, just tell, I can quickly > rsync the chroot back to Woody. It's not that simple. The following list of installed packages is known to give you the effect: http://www.lichtenheld.de/debian/perlupdate.installed > BTW: Maybe this bug should be retitled, too, as it the bug seems to be > some race-condition between the installation of perl and doc-base? Yeah, feel free to do that. And to reassign it to perl as doc-base doesn't really have anything to do with the problem, it just points it out... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
