Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295628: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295488: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.10 2.6.10-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
tags 285276 patch
tags 296674 patch
thanks
hi,
i believe the attached patch fixes the vulnerability. i took the redhat
src rpm patch "mysql-3.23.58-security.patch", removed the parts of the
patch that are already addressed by other DSA's, adjusted some line
numbers, and did a little extra massag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 285276 patch
Bug#285276: mysql: vulnerability issue (CAN-2004-0956 and CAN-2004-0957)
Tags were: security woody
Bug#296674: mysql-server: Security bug in MySQL in woody (CAN-2004-0957)
Tags added: patch
> tags 296674 patch
Bug#296674: mysql-server
Package: libdevmapper1.01
Version: 2:1.01.00-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
# ls -l /etc/rc2.d/S20libdevmapper1.01
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Mar 7 20:59 /etc/rc2.d/S20libdevmapper1.01 ->
../init.d/libdevmapper1.01
this used to reside in rcS.d, not rc2.d. I'm pretty
Package: base-files
Version: 3.0.2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch security
Justification: root security hole
I recently noticed that /usr/local and /usr/local/{bin,sbin} are
group-writable and owned by root:staff. This is wrong: those directories
are in the default PATH for root. They (and files
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:32:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291709: fixed in asterisk-chan-misdn 0.0.3rc6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 298939 + fixed
Bug#298939: libxpm4: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605)
Tags were: fixed-upstream patch security upstream
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
severity 298051 important
thanks
Discussion with the RMs decided that these exif leakage bugs are not RC.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 298051 important
Bug#298051: imagemagick: information disclosure from exif thumbnails
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 294163 normal
Bug#294163: libdb4.3: build failed on hppa
Severity set to `normal'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:43:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledging this NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:12:35PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> >>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
> >>A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
> >>and also t
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:47:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298868: fixed in nautilus-cd-burner 2.8.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:17:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298850: fixed in gnome-terminal 2.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>>fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to upgrade batik to 1.5.1
and also to upload a new fop package with an embedded batik
library in the current versi
Package: culmus
Version: 0.101-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi Baruch,
I upgraded to fontconfig 2.3.1-1 and saw it overwrites the previous conf. I
guessed that culmus add stuff to /etc/fonts/local.conf and decided to reinstall
the package.
Fontconfig new version ha
It turns out that the older version of lesstif2 we have also had the
variables defined as signed ints, so the patch to fix CAN-2005-0605 in
lesstif2 is shorter than the fixes needed for newer versions of the
library. I combined this fix with the fix for lesstif1 that Martin Pitt
was kind enough to
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:32:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298849: fixed in gnome-session 2.8.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
> However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
> breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
> libbatik-java.
> fop is currently not in testing
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:08:22PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On Thursday, 10. March 2005 12:25, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> > > Package: libsem-dev
> > > Version: error processing libsem-dev
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justifi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 298924 sid
Bug#298924: gwc: FTBFS: cc1: error: invalid option `arch=$arch`
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Package: bittorrent-gui
Version: 3.4.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I get this error when launching btdownloadgui
Gdk-ERROR **: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation)
serial 185 error_code 2 request_code 45 minor_code 0
and then it returns back to t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 297283 normal
Bug#297283: mysql-server: mysql don't start after an upgrade
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: bglibs-doc
Version: 1.019-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the Arial font in the file Helvetica.ttf. No
license is included for this font. Without a free license Debian cannot
distribute this font, and therefore it should be removed. As far as I
can se
Package: atris
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the font NewMediumNormal.ttf, which includes the
following copyright statement: "Copyright  1998 by Matthew Welch. All
Rights Reserved." The license on the author's web page[1] is non-free,
and the atris package co
Package: afterstep
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the font:
afterstep-2.00.03/libAfterImage/apps/test.ttf
No copyright or license for this font is included. Unless this font has
been released in the public domain, Debian cannot distribute it, and
therefore
Package: epplets
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains aircut3.ttf, which is one of Ray Larabie's fonts.
No license for the font is included, and Larabie's usual license is
non-free. Without a free license Debian cannot distribute this font, and
therefore it should be
Package: enlightenment
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Enlightenment contains many non-free fonts, including:
- aircut3.ttf, rothwell.ttf: two of Ray Larabie's fonts
- Verah___.ttf: "BX Fonts 1997. This font may be used and distributed
for free, but not be sold."
- vixar.ttf: "Copy
Package: caudium
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains three non-free fonts:
- fontrstc.ttf: "Â 1998 utopiafonts. [EMAIL PROTECTED]", see also
the readme in [1].
- lucida_unicode.ttf and verdana.ttf: two Microsoft fonts.
Without a free license Debian cannot distrib
Thanks, I will upload a new Moodle package (1.4.4) tomorrow, I'll fix this
issue then.
Best regards
pgpjtM8fgmNGQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(CC'ing Helge Lenz the original reporter)
I have been able to create a core file with the debugging version of
the X server by using kill -SEGV, as Branden Robinson described. Then
I tried to reproduce the problem with gnat-gps, and no core file is
created. The X server exits as though gnat-gps
Package: gnurobbo
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the font robbo.ttf, which includes the following
copyright statement: "Copyright 1990-1996 Bitstream Inc. All rights
reserved."
Without a free license Debian cannot distribute this font, and thus it
should be r
Package: gem
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Gem contains the non-free fonts Arial, Courier New and Times New Roman.
Without a free license Debian cannot distribute these fonts, and
therefore they should be removed.
To get replacement fonts, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera,
ttf
Package: freewrl
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains many Bitstream fonts. The README file does not
include a license, instead it states they were copied from Red Hat 7.2.
I downloaded that distribution, but could find no trace of the fonts.
Without a free license D
Package: golem
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the font vixar.ttf, which includes the following
copyright statement: "Copyright (c) 1995 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights reserved."
Without a free license Debian cannot distribute this font, and thus it
should b
Package: gozer
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the non-free font helmetr.ttf. I know this is
rather painful, as I read in the changelog that this font was used to
replace several other non-free fonts to begin with. But it seems that
helmetr.ttf's inclusion in Op
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:17:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298808: fixed in file-roller 2.8.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:03:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298861: fixed in libgnomesu 0.9.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: icewm-themes
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the non-free font Chicago, which includes the
following copyright notice: "Â 1990-91 Apple Computer Inc. Â 1990-91
Type Solutions Inc. Â 1990-91 The Font Bureau Inc."
This font should be removed. If a replac
Package: luola-data
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains the font bluebold.ttf, which is one of Ray
Larabie's fonts and non-free. This font should be removed. To get
a replacement, you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera, ttf-freefont,
or one of the other free fonts pac
Package: libxpm4
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: grave
Tags: security, upstream, fixed-upstream, patch
CAN-2005-0605 indicates that "scan.c for LibXPM may allow attackers to
execute arbitrary code via a negative bitmap_unit value that leads to a
buffer overflow."
Patch is here:
https://bugs.f
Package: moodle
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Moodle contains two non-free fonts: Arial Narrow in:
/usr/share/moodle/lang/cs/fonts/default.ttf
/usr/share/moodle/lang/en/fonts/default.ttf
/usr/share/moodle/lang/sq/fonts/default.ttf
and Optima in:
/usr/share/moodle/la
Package: langband-data
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package contains several non-free fonts:
- augie.ttf (http://www.speakeasy.org/~ecf/augie.txt)
- luximb.ttf (from ttf-xfree86-nonfree)
- lettergo.ttf and nova.ttf (no copyright information, no license)
These fonts should be
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:02:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298807: fixed in evince 0.1.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:48:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298846: fixed in gdesklets 0.33.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:48:32 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: phluid
Version: 0.0.3.2+cvs.20020210-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
phluid contains the non-free font "National First Font", which contains
the following copyright statement:
"Freeware - Copyright [c] - Roger White - 1994 - All Rights Reserved."
Without license this font
Package: roxen3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The nfonts directory contains many non-free Truetype fonts. These should
be removed. I'm not sure what these fonts are used for, but if
replacements are needed you can depend on ttf-bitstream-vera,
ttf-freefont and/or one of the other f
Package: scorched3d-data
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Scorched3d contains Courier New and Arial Black, which are non-free
fonts:
scorched3d-38.1/data/fonts/courier.ttf
scorched3d-38.1/data/fonts/test.ttf
scorched3d-38.1/data/fonts/testout.ttf
These fonts should be removed. To get
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:50:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298872: fixed in totem 0.100-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: tulip
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Tulip contains two non-free fonts, Luxi Sans Regular and Luxi Sans Bold:
tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/font.ttf
tulip-2.0.0/library/tulip-ogl/bitmaps/fontb.ttf
These fonts should be removed. To get replacement fonts, you can dep
Package: distcc
Version: 2.18.1-5
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge sid security
Saw this on bugtraq:
XCode ships with version 2.0.1 of distcc. We also tried updating to
2.18.3 and had similar issues with that version as well.
Apple was not contacted prior to this release because the exploit for
distcc
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:17:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296925: fixed in prozilla 1:1.3.7.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: gwc
Version: 0.20.10-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on most arches because it's
trying to set the -mcpu and -march to the architecture. This
does not work at all in most cases.
It failed on all buildd builds so far.
Why is it trying to set that option in the
Package: mesa
version: 6.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on all arches with the following
error:
CC=cc CXX=c++ ../../../bin/mklib -o GLU -major 1 \
-minor 3 -patch 060201 \
-cplusplus -install ../../../lib \
-L../../../lib -lGL -lm libutil/err
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298167: fixed in blender 2.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#22: fixed in blender 2.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 296925 pending
Bug#296925: remote shell via format string vulnerability (CAN-2005-0523)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Hi,
I prepared a package for the batik 1.5.1 upstream release.
However during testing the package I realized that batik 1.5.1
breaks fop ! As far as I see no other packages depend on
libbatik-java.
fop is currently not in testing although a valid candidate.
A "solution" to the problem would be to u
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:32:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298847: fixed in gnome-gv 1:2.8.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Am 2005-03-10 14:10:59, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> This message will test the Subject for
>
> ( %c %i %o %t )
So we have:
( 134559456 3326 % )
Which mean:
%c is droped
%i 134559456serialdate ? (1974-04-07 10:37:36)
%o 3326 ??
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:17:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298234: fixed in grisbi 0.5.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:06:13AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Since the errors seem to be rounding errors, and as such almost
> inevitable unless extreme care is taken, it might be worthwhile to punt
> on the issue and just disable the "make check" in debian/rules. This
Sound advice. Actually
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:33:19AM +0100, Alban browaeys wrote:
> >For the record:
> >
> > ; Print out errors (as a part of the output). For production web sites,
> > ; you're strongly encouraged to turn this feature off, and use error logging
> > ; instead (see below). Keeping display_errors ena
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:17:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297855: fixed in cdbs 0.4.27-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures,
so there should be a sourceful upload.
--
off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures,
so there should be a sourceful upload.
--
off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures,
so there should be a sourceful upload.
--
off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday, 10. March 2005 12:25, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> > Package: libsem-dev
> > Version: error processing libsem-dev
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > FYI, installed a fresh chroot and got
I forgot to add:
Only a recompile is required, but it's required on multiple architectures,
so there should be a sourceful upload.
--
off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Package: totem
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild totem without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a sourcefu
Package: mozilla-bonobo
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild mozilla-bonobo without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there sho
Package: nautilus-cd-burner
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild nautilus-cd-burner without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so t
Package: planner
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild planner without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a sourc
Package: rhythmbox
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild rhythmbox without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:44:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledgement
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: libgnomesu
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild libgnomesu without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a
Hello Erinn
On 2005-03-10 Erinn Clark wrote:
> (on behalf on RM Steve Langasek)
>
> Please rebuild gnome-gv without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
> moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
> multiple architectures, so there should be a sourceful upload.
Ok, I'
Package: gswitchit
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gswitchit without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a s
Package: goobox
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild goobox without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a sourcef
Package: gnome-terminal
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf on RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gnome-terminal without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there sho
Package: gnotime
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf on RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gnotime without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a sourc
Package: gtodo-applet
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf of RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gtodo-applet without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 04:39:22AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Package: libsem-dev
> Version: error processing libsem-dev
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> FYI, installed a fresh chroot and got the following
> error:
>
> (Reading database ... 18003 files and dir
Package: gnome-pilot
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf on RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gnome-pilot without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be
Package: gnome-gv
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf on RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gnome-gv without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a sou
Package: gdesklets
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf on RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gdesklets without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there should be a so
Package: gnome-session
Severity: grave
Justification: libhowl0 moving to non-free
(on behalf on RM Steve Langasek)
Please rebuild gnome-session without the libhowl0 dependency since it's
moving to non-free. Only a recompile is required, but it's required on
multiple architectures, so there shoul
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:17:16 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295554: fixed in xinetd 1:2.3.13-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: fuse-source
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Hello,
the configure call for the modules build is missing an important option.
Please add:
--with-kernel="$(KSRC)" \
If you cannot reproduce it, move your kernel to a non-standard location
and you will see what I mean.
Regards,
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:02:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298771: fixed in ethereal 0.10.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:02:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294746: fixed in antlr 2.7.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Those security-related bugs were fixed NMU. [additional mail so this
gets documented in BTS; thanks Jeroen for noticing]
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: raidtools2
Version: 1.00.3-17
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Running raidreconf to add another disk to a RAID-5 aborts when almost being done
with error message:
raid5_map_global_to_local: disk 4 block out of range: 488098 (487840) gblo
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:50:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-1 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
>For the record:
>
> ; Print out errors (as a part of the output). For production web sites,
> ; you're strongly encouraged to turn this feature off, and use error logging
> ; instead (see below). Keeping display_errors enabled on a production web
> site
> ; may reveal security information to en
Package: raidtools2
Version: 1.00.3-17
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Running raidreconf to add another disk to a RAID-5 aborts when almost being done
with error message:
raid5_map_global_to_local: disk 4 block out of range: 488098 (487840) gblock =
1464296
This happ
98 matches
Mail list logo
