Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Onkar Shinde
* Package name: jakarta-taglibs-standard
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/standard/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:02:28AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:37:29AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> > On 5/4/11, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> >
>> > > This may be related
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:02:28AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:37:29AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>>> > On 5/4/11, Mike Hommey
Package: libcommons-net-java
Version: 1.4.1-5
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
There is minor mistake in short description.
The current description is as follows.
"dummy package for upgrading to libcommons-net-java"
It implies the package is for upgrade path to itself.
The description should be
Package: jftp
Version: 1.51~pre4-2
I was planning to port the packaging changes I did in Ubuntu for jftp
to Debian this week. But Varun has already done most of the changes in
1.51~pre4-2 (in NEW queue). Following are some changes I believe are
still remaining. All comments welcome.
1. debian/con
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Varun Hiremath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Onkar,
>
> On Tue, 04 Nov, 2008 at 01:39:38AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Package: jftp
>> Version: 1.51~pre4-2
>>
>> I was planning to port the packaging changes I did in
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Kumar Appaiah
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:48:16AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
>> > at net.sf.jftp.gui.base.StatusPanel.(StatusPanel.jav
Package: lucene2
Version: 2.4.0+ds1-1
In file
contrib/highlighter/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/highlight/HighlighterTest.java,
the xml snippet in the text testEncoding does not have reference to a
DTD anymore. So this unit test does not need any network access to
execute.
Hence patch 81_pre
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> severity 506782 minor
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Package: lucene2
>> Version: 2.4.0+ds1-1
>
> Why is this a normal bug? ;-)
I wasn't sure of the priority.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 503780 + pending
> thanks,
>
> Hi Onkar,
>
> is the package ready for upload? Do you need a sponsor?
Yes. It is available in pkg-java svn trunk. I have not yet tagged the
new revision.
I have already mailed debian-jav
Package: robocode
Version: 1.6.1~beta2-2
Following bug is reported in Ubuntu. [1] The version in Ubuntu is same
as the version in Debian. So I thought it would be better to forwarded
the bug to Debian.
Bug description in Ubuntu:
Robocode depends directly on openjdk-jre, although it should run jus
Varun/Kumar,
I just checked the latest jftp source in pkg-java svn. I believe the
file names have been wrongly swapped.
README.source is supposed to talk about patch system. But it talks
about removal of jar files to create orig.tar.gz.
IIRC, README.Debian is supposed to talk about removal of jar
Package: libjaxp1.2-java
Please remove the package from repositories for following reasons.
1. There are no rdepends on this package except libjaxp1.2-java-gcj
which is created from same source.
2. Even the libjaxp1.3-java has got 'End Of Life' since Februrary
2008. [1] So there is no point keepin
Package: imagej
Following bug is reported in Ubuntu by Peter Husen. [1]
***
ImageJ fails to run on an amd64 system if ia32-sun-java6-bin is
installed. It fails with the error message
> Running a 64-bit JVM is not supported on this platform.
This seems to be due to the script /usr/bin/
Package: fop
Version: 1:0.95.dfsg-1
I have found following problems with the fop package from
experimental, version 1:0.95.dfsg-1. One of them is present in the
version in unstable/testing as well and was reported in Ubuntu in
Intrepid development cycle.
1. Bump libxmlgraphics-commons-java versio
Package: libjogl-java
Version: 1.1.1+dak1-3
The library does not use any Java 5 or 6 specific features. Hence it
should be compiled for target JVM 1.4 so it is compatible with more
runtimes.
Simply adding following line to debian/rules should be sufficient.
ANT_OPTS := -Dant.build.java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Onkar Shinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jakarta-jmeter
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang
Package: libjson-java
Following bug is reported in Ubuntu.[1] Since the package version in
Ubuntu is same as in Debian, I thought it was better to forward the
bug.
***
libjson-java requires a number of other libraries, but it fails to
Depends on any of them. The package should
Here is what I am stuck at.
1. I need sponsorship to the update of libcommons-jexl-java. The
updated packaging lies in pkg-java svn.
2. I will need to package excalibur-logger [1] as it is essential
dependency of jmeter.
I plan to get everything done in Ubuntu first, as I have upload rights
there
Ant itself does not need java compiler to run. Following is the message I get.
$ ant
Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/lib/tools.jar
Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
Build failed
You can see that while tools.jar is not present, ant tried to lookup
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are there already packages available for testing?
Jan,
I don't have any packages to test. I am still figuring out what all
functionality of Jmeter can be compiled/built with existing libraries
in Debian. I will have some in
Why is this RC bug? The version you have specified is in experimental.
testing has 1:0.94.dfsg-2. AFAIK, that version is not affected by this
bug.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Vincent,
Thanks for enlightenment. I am not very familiar with BTS. :-)
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libhibernate3-java
Version: 3.3.1.GA+dak1-2
I believe that libhibernate3-java has following incorrect
dependencies. Please correct me if I am wrong.
1. java-gcj-compat-dev - should be removed.
2. java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime - should be changed to
java-gcj-compat-headless | java2-runt
Package: libjboss-web-services-java
Version: 0.0+svn5660+dak1-1
Severity: serious
I am filing a bug (with minor changes) since I got no reply to my mail at [1].
I was recently checking if jbossas4 version from Debian unstable
builds properly on Ubuntu so that I can drop changes made in last
Ubunt
Package: hw-detect
Severity: normal
I recently installed Debian lenny on my ibook G4 (powerpc). Please
refer installation report in bug #525902.
After the installation was complete and I booted into Debian, I found
out that sound was not working.
The problem is that snd-powermac module is not load
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> Hello Onkar,
>
> I believe that this patch should fix the detection at installer.
>
> I'm also attaching the test.sh script that I'd like you to run and see
> if it does shows snd-aoa being registered. I belive it should work for
> your har
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> Hello Onkar,
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Onkar,
>>>
>>> I believe that this patch sh
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Thanks for your report. I'll add that back as soon as I can (say,
> tomorrow ?). Where could I find this hypenation jar ?
>
Here - http://sourceforge.net/projects/offo
Following page also talks about similar method to detect path of
hyp
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> Hello Onkar,
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Here is the sad news. It doesn't work. Check following outputs (all
>> command run as root).
>>
>> iBook:/home/onkar# modpro
> Omegat needs libaccess-bridge-java-jni but it is missing in dependencies.
Can you please provide more explanation? Why does omegat need
libaccess-bridge-java-jni? What kind of problems are you facing in the
absence of this dependency?
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
Subject: jruby1.1: Please merge packaging changes from Ubuntu if possible
Package: jruby1.1
Version: 1.1.6-2
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Please merge following packaging changes from Ubuntu if possible.
1. Change build dependency java6-sdk to default-jdk.
I am
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> This package should be installable on other architectures than only
> powerpc as this package is used by the QEMU emulator, so the
> Architecture: all is correct. Closing the bug.
Can you please then remove the code from debian/rules that
Package: gupnp-tools
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: important
The build dependency libglib2.0-dev has version specified as >= 2.16.
But looking at configure script the minimum version required is
actually 2.12 (GIO_REQUIRED=2.12). Also libgtk2.0-dev needs to be >=
2.16 (GTK_REQUIRED=2.16) but there is
The latest upstream version required java 1.6 to build and run. This
will limit the users to only using openjdk-6-jre or sun-java6-jre.
In my opinion, for now we should simply upload the experimental
version to unstable.
Another question that came to my mind is, do we really need versioned
binari
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.80-5
Severity: important
While trying to check if jruby1.1 builds with default-jdk build
dependency, I got following error in
pbuilder chroot.
Setting up java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.80-5) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative path
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj
Package: javahelper
Version: 0.18
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
In unstable distribution or unstable chroot, the package fails to
install. The reason being that it
declares dependency on icepick which is removed from unstable.
Please check following links for clarification about ice
Sebastien,
I had logged this bug against jruby1.1. Can you please fix it there too?
Or are you planning to ask for removal of jruby1.1 form archives?
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Package: doxia
Version: 1.0-alpha-11-3
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Currently the JAVA_HOME specified in debian/rules does not correspond
to default-jdk.
It should be '/usr/lib/jvm/default-java' instead of '/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj'.
While this may not cause pro
I checked the source of velocity and it looks like it provides two ant
tasks - TexenTask and AnakiaTask. These tasks have dependency on ant
for functionality. Also anyone trying to use these tasks is expected
to have ant installed. None of the remaining classes in velocity.jar
depend on ant. So the
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Ludovic
Claude wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I propose to break the package velocity in 2 parts:
> velocity: contains velocity.jar and related stuff
> velocity-ant: contains the links to be installed in /usr/share/ant/lib/
> for the velocity Ant tasks
>
> The rational is
Package: openbios-ppc
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: important
The debian/rules file has logic that causes the build to fail when
building on non-powerpc architecture. Please check the build failure
in Ubuntu at [1]. Even though this is the case the architecture is
specified as all in debian/control fi
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Ludovic
Claude wrote:
>
> Onkar,
>
> I don't want to split the velocity jar in 2 parts, only the packaging.
> In the current packaging, installing velocity means that some links to
> jars are installed under /usr/share/ant/lib, which is not desirable in
> most cases.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Ludovic
Claude wrote:
>
> So the resolution of this bug implies 2 things:
>
> Ant
> - add support for user libraries in /usr/local/lib/ant
I am not sure I agree with this one. But I have nothing against it.
> Velocity:
> - remove all links under ant/lib
Right.
In
Package: libextractor-java
Version: 0.5.18-5
Severity: serious
The package fails to build in pbuilder unstable chroot with following error.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: libgcj-dev which is a virtual package.
The following actions will r
Package: libcommons-validator-java
Version: 1:1.3.1-2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The package currently uses default-jdk as build dependency. But the
JAVA_HOME specified in the
debian/rules file does corresponds to java-gcj-compat-dev (java-gcj)
instead of d
Package: biojava-live
Version: 1.7.svn.20090419-1
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The package currently fails to build in pbuilder chroot for unstable
with following error.
compile-tests:
[javac] Compiling 173 source files to
/tmp/buildd/biojava-live-1.7.sv
@Andreas,
Did you try to build it in pbuilder. I added the build dependency
ant-optional and built modified package in pbuilder. It builds fine.
@Peter,
You forgot to actually add the patch. :-)
Cheers,
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Here is the patch I injected into packaging SVN:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/biojava/trunk/debian/control?op=diff&rev=0&sc=0
This is exactly the change I tried while doing local build in
pbuilder. But there is on
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> how are you? How is the process so far? :)
>
> On Thursday 19 March 2009, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> So the conclusion is that for Jmeter to enter in Debian:
>> 1. libcommons-jexl-java needs to be update
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Onkar Shinde
* Package name: excalibur-logkit
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://excalibur.apache.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Onkar Shinde
* Package name: excalibur-logger
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://excalibur.apache.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Here is an update. Both excalibur-logkit and excalibur-logger are in
> Ubuntu archive for next version (karmic). I should be done with jmeter
> hopefully by end of next week. After that I will port all these
> packages to Debian.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> On Wednesday 12 August 2009 13:37:19 you wrote:
>> Jmeter has landed in Ubuntu. You can search and download the packages
>> from http://packages.ubuntu.com. You will need to manually install
>> libexcalibur-logkit-java and libexcali
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> Package: azureus
> Version: 4.2.0.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I have openjdk-6-jre installed, because azureus used to depend on it.
> openjdk works fine with other java applications as well, so no
>
Now that libjgrapht-java is moved to main and the package is renamed
to libjgrapht0.6-java can someone please fix the build and runtime
dependencies of cdk?
Please also fix bug 546306.
Cheers,
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Ant upstream authors recommend using classpath attribute for optional
ant tasks when defining the task in build.xml.[1] Hence the symlink
should not be present in ant's library. Also the symlink modifies the
default classpath of ant which will cause problem if user wants to use
another version of i
Any update on this issue?
Unfortunately I could not get access to a i386 machine to check side
effects of the patch if any.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: javatools
Version: 0.20
Severity: Important
javahelper has runtime dependencies gcj and fastjar. Looking at the
source it does not look like it specifically needs those packages.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Having these dependencies means that GCJ is installed even if user
already ha
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Wed Jul 22 01:23, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> javahelper has runtime dependencies gcj and fastjar. Looking at the
>> source it does not look like it specifically needs those packages.
>> Please correct me if I am w
Here is an update. Both excalibur-logkit and excalibur-logger are in
Ubuntu archive for next version (karmic). I should be done with jmeter
hopefully by end of next week. After that I will port all these
packages to Debian.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debi
I can verify that the patch attached to the bug fixes the issue for me
on powerpc (ibook G4). The playback does not work at all in totem
before applying the patch. I am using totem packages form experimental
and with this patch I can have complete playback (with navigation).
Searching for word BIG
It looks like gcj does not understand '-sourcepath' option. I tried
changing the build dependency to default-jdk but there are other
problems with debian/rules file which still cause problem.
Upstream now contains a ant build script which does the heavy lifting
of the build process. I guess mainta
tags 549838 + unreproducible
thanks
excalibur-logkit has alternate build dependency on libjboss-j2ee-java.
So it should not fail to build.
This bug is not reproducible in pbuilder chroot for sid. I have
uploaded a log at [1]
[1] http://people.ubuntu.com/~onkarshinde/excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_build.l
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Antti-Juhani
Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:21:21PM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
>> BTW, I think there was a classpath conflict between :
>> /usr/share/ant/lib/junit4.jar (4.7)
>> and
>> /usr/share/ant/lib/junit.jar (3.8.7)
>> Both provides junit
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Antti-Juhani
Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:34:10PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Please do not add the link again.
>
> If this ends up being the result, a NEWS.Debian entry would be appropriate,
> since I'm likely not the only
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Antti-Juhani
Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:46:07PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> How about specify the relative path like "${lib.dir}/junit.jar" so
>> that lib.dir can be overridden by the package maintainer in the
>
>> install: install -m 644 -D
>> j3d-core/build/default/opt/native/libj3dcore-ogl.so \
>> debian/libjava3d-jni/usr/lib/jni/libj3dcore-ogl.so
>> cannot stat `j3d-core/build/default/opt/native/libj3dcore-ogl.so': No such
>> file or directory
>> make: *** [install/libjava3d-jni] Error 1
>
Please find attached the patch that fixes this bug and improves the
packaging in general.
Cheers,
Onkar
proguard_4.3-2.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Package: cdk
Version: 1:1.0.2-2
Severity: important
libvecmath1.2-java is unofficial and unmaintained implementation of vecmath
api. We now have the official implementation in the repository (source vecmath,
binary libvecmath-java). Please migrate the build dependency for cdk
accordingly.
Also
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Source: java-gnome
> Version: 4.0.13-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on lxdebian.bfinv.de
> [...]
>> KILL Xvfb
>> KILL metacity
>> Excepti
The problem is resolved in the Ubuntu version in hardy (8.04) in
acceptable way (IMO), even if you don't agree it is a problem.
I will be glad if the fix will be merged in Debian.
Regards,
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
> I've done quite a good amount of work on batik already for debian - I
> haven't looked at the work done in ubuntu yet. However, I had not
> realized yet the need to xml-commons-external (it took me a very long
> time to get batik to build...).
>
> I'm having a look right now, and I'll import it
Package: bytecode
bytecode fails to build currently on Ubuntu build servers.[1] The
reason is that the build dependency ant is missing.
Can you please fix this problem, so that I can simply file a sync
request then in Ubuntu.
Also last changelog entry has made it a native package. Please fix that.
Is anyone working on this. We have already released 1.3.4 and planning
to do 1.3.5 within a week. We would prefer to sync/merge package in
Ubuntu from Debian.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to work of Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, tomcat 6
is packaged in Ubuntu Intrepid release. Can anyone please work on
adopting it to Debian?
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both batik 1.7 (waiting in NEW queue) and its dependency
xml-commons-external are uploaded in Ubuntu 8.10 repositories. It will
be great if someone can adopt these packages in Debian.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Jan 22, 2008 11:18 PM, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 20:49 +0530 schrieb Onkar Shinde:
> > The problem is that the DTD can not be used for validation in programs
> > (at least java applications). The reason is that the program tri
Package: kdissert
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: normal
Please modify the rules file to include dh_icons for updating icons cache.
This will also need debhelper version bump to >= 5.0.51.
Attached is the debdiff.
kdissert_1.0.7-2.debdiff
Description: Binary data
The problem is that the DTD can not be used for validation in programs
(at least java applications). The reason is that the program tries to
find entity sets in same directory as DTD since the DTD contains only
file names and not full path.
Is there any solution for this other than having symlinks
Package: libcommons-lang-java
Version: 2.3-3
Severity: important
'ant' is missing from build dependencies. This causes FTBFS in
pbuilder. Debdiff is attached on launchpad bug 180502.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Please find attached debdiff that fixes this bug and other build
problems with the package.
Onkar
maven-embedder_2.0.4-1.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
The pmu_battery module was not built in kernels < 2.32 in Debian.
gnome-power-manager previously used some different methods for battery
detection. So it didn't depend on presence of pmu_battery. IIRC, the
problem started showing up since gnome-power-manager version 2.28. Now
it can not detect bat
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>> [java] FAILURES!!!
>> [java] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 7
>
> it looks like another gij f*ckup. Switching to default-jdk helps.
I am working on this. I jus
Package: libsurefire-java
Version: 2.4.3-3
Severity: important
I am working packaging struts2 from source. While doing a test build I faced
problem where maven-surefire-plugin is not detected by mvn-debian.
Following is the debug output.
on...@ibook:~/Desktop/struts-2.1.8/src$ mvn-debian -e -f
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Ludovic Claude
wrote:
>
> Hi Onkar,
>
> Can you give me the versions of maven2 and maven-debian-helper?
maven2 - 2.2.1-2
maven-debian-helper - 0.9
> Also, have you tried building your package with the maven.mk CDBS
> scripts? mvn-debian is not maintained and shou
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Ludovic Claude
wrote:
>
> Hi Onkar,
>
> First, try to get the latest versions of those 2 packages from Debian.
> There are also some new versions of related packages, I remember that
> there was maven-javadoc-plugin, maven-site-plugin, all doxia packages
> and mayb
Package: maven-debian-helper
Version: 0.9
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/mh_make
I am working on packaging struts 2 and found out that the source does not
contain the main pom.xml in source root directory. Instead it is in src
directory. Trying to use mh_make with this source fails because mh_m
Package: maven-debian-helper
Version: 0.9
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/maven-vars.mk
ant-vars.mk has a variable DEB_ANT_BUILDFILE which if set from debian/rules
file is used as path to an alternate build.xml file. Similar variable
(DEB_MAVEN_BUILDFILE) should be defined in ma
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Second, to build the packaging for a Maven project, use mh_make on the
>> sources, it will locate all the dependencies and create most of the
>> debian files for you.
>
> I will try this way and report back.
mh_
I have one question about this package. Is there any particular reason
why you created the package from scratch instead of basing it on the
cobertura package from Ubuntu?
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
tags 562437 patch
thanks
Please find attached a debdiff against current version archive. This
patch ports the Ubuntu changes to Debian which essentially fixes this
bug and few other minor changes.
Regards,
Onkar
--
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask wh
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 21:53 +0200 schrieb Torsten Werner:
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
>> wrote:
>> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>>
>> cdk builds perfectly on my amd64 cowbuilder.
>
> Which jgrapht version did
Package: mplayer
Version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-2
Severity: normal
According to mplayer news [1] it supports new way to play DVDs - mplayer
dvdnav://. As per my understanding this means display of DVD menu. But even
though Debian's mplayer package is created from a recent snapshot this
function
Package: libspring-2.5-java
Version: 2.5.6.SEC01-9
Severity: normal
I am working on packaging xwork2 which in turn is build-dep of struts2. xwork2
has build-dep 'spring-aspects' according to the pom.xml file in source package.
It looks like this jar file should be built by libspring-2.5-java sou
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Debian's mplayer is based on a snapshot about 14 months old. So this
> will most likely have to wait for mplayer rc4.
What does 'svn20100502' in version string signify then? It is this
string that led me to believe that it is recent svn
I am all for free sw such as OpenJDK, only my netbank disagrees,
so I do need at least an install of java that works in my iceweasel,
and furthermore, preferably one that is acceptable to my netbank.
Did you try installing sun-java6-plugin from non-free repository?
Onkar
--
Passion - Some peo
There is already a junit4 package at version 4.8.1-1. Isn't that what
you are looking for?
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, David Paleino wrote:
> On Friday 12 March 2010 17:33:11, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> There is already a junit4 package at version 4.8.1-1. Isn't that what
>> you are looking for?
>
> Yes :)
>
> However, the package is at version 4.8.1,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> I think the problem here is that surefire plugin does not have any
>> 'debian' version in maven repository (only 2.4.3 version).
>
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
