Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-03-26 Thread Vincas Dargis
Control: tags -1 +fixed-upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/qTox/qTox/pull/5577 qTox now has bran new profile in upstream, that will hopefully will be available in Buster+1 :) .

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-07 Thread Vincas Dargis
On 2019-01-07 11:46, Yangfl wrote: Hi, Do you have such profile now? I'm preparing the last release for buster. If so, please submit asap since the freezing is approaching. No, I don't. I am not particularly targeting Buster, so feel free to release whenever convenient. I a planing to start

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-07 Thread Yangfl
Hi, Do you have such profile now? I'm preparing the last release for buster. If so, please submit asap since the freezing is approaching. Vincas Dargis 于2019年1月6日周日 下午11:07写道: > > https://github.com/qTox/qTox/issues/5484

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-06 Thread Vincas Dargis
https://github.com/qTox/qTox/issues/5484

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-06 Thread Vincas Dargis
On 2019-01-05 14:33, intrigeri wrote:> Vincas Dargis: intrigeri what's your take on this? Where should new profiles be "placed"? Having the policy live along with the software it confines, i.e. in the upstream VCS, is ideal, as long as upstream somewhat cares about it Yeah, I guess so, it wo

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-06 Thread Yangfl
intrigeri 于2019年1月5日周六 下午8:45写道: > > Hi, > > Vincas Dargis: > > intrigeri what's your take on this? Where should new profiles be > > "placed"? > > Having the policy live along with the software it confines, i.e. > in the upstream VCS, is ideal, as long as upstream somewhat cares > about it and th

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-05 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Vincas Dargis: > intrigeri what's your take on this? Where should new profiles be > "placed"? Having the policy live along with the software it confines, i.e. in the upstream VCS, is ideal, as long as upstream somewhat cares about it and the maintainer of said policy tracks upstream changes

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-05 Thread Vincas Dargis
On 2019-01-04 14:05, Yangfl wrote: I'd love to see any improvement in program quality. As you're willing to create the AppArmor profile, I'd like to suggest you to directly submit your changes to upstream; just open a pr in their github repo https://github.com/qTox/qTox . I have mixed feelings

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-04 Thread Yangfl
Vincas Dargis 于2019年1月4日周五 上午2:36写道: > > Dear Maintainer, > > I'm happy to see that we now have qTox in Debian! Thanks to Maintainer! > > It would be even cooler to have it confined with AppArmor. qTox > maintains connections to various untrusted peers over the world, and so > it is important do r

Bug#918138: qtox: Add AppArmor profile

2019-01-03 Thread Vincas Dargis
Package: qtox Version: 1.16.3-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream User: pkg-apparmor-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: new-profile Dear Maintainer, I'm happy to see that we now have qTox in Debian! Thanks to Maintainer! It would be even cooler to have it confined with AppArmor. qTox maintai