Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 27/11/15 17:54, Jo Shields wrote:
> I think this is close to startable, if a transition slot will be available
> soon.
Let's do this now.
Cheers,
Emilio
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 20:01 +, Jo Shields wrote:
>
> On 09/12/15 19:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 19:27 +, Jo Shields wrote:
> >> opentk is suffering from some archive cruft issues, I think -
> >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libopentk1.1-cil seems fine to me, but
On 09/12/15 19:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 19:27 +, Jo Shields wrote:
>> opentk is suffering from some archive cruft issues, I think -
>> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libopentk1.1-cil seems fine to me, but
>> the old ABI https://packages.debian.org/sid/libopentk1.0-c
On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 19:27 +, Jo Shields wrote:
> opentk is suffering from some archive cruft issues, I think -
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libopentk1.1-cil seems fine to me, but
> the old ABI https://packages.debian.org/sid/libopentk1.0-cil package is
> still showing up in a few places.
On 09/12/15 19:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hey Jo,
>
> On 02/12/15 16:21, Jo Shields wrote:
>> Related note: I've uploaded a fixed version of src:fsharp to Experimental, so
>> all the issues reported on
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mono.html
>> are accounted for, in bu
Hey Jo,
On 02/12/15 16:21, Jo Shields wrote:
> Related note: I've uploaded a fixed version of src:fsharp to Experimental, so
> all the issues reported on
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mono.html
> are accounted for, in bugs which are all on the FTP team (including the minor
> ABI b
On 01/12/15 23:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 30/11/15 20:35, Jo Shields wrote:
On 30/11/15 18:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 27/11/15 17:54, Jo Shields wrote:
I think this is close to startable, if a transition slot will be available soon.
Of the 17 "bad" packages on the relea
On 30/11/15 20:35, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 30/11/15 18:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 27/11/15 17:54, Jo Shields wrote:
>>> I think this is close to startable, if a transition slot will be available
>>> soon.
>>>
>>> Of the 17 "bad" packages on the release tracker, 2 FTBFS for other
On 30/11/15 18:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 27/11/15 17:54, Jo Shields wrote:
>> I think this is close to startable, if a transition slot will be available
>> soon.
>>
>> Of the 17 "bad" packages on the release tracker, 2 FTBFS for other reasons
>> (and
>> are removed from Testing any
On 27/11/15 17:54, Jo Shields wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:03:23 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 07/09/15 18:28, Jo Shields wrote:
>> > Package: release.debian.org
>> > Severity: normal
>> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> > Usertags: transition
>> >
>> > Mono requi
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:03:23 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 07/09/15 18:28, Jo Shields wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Mono requires a (hopefully minor) transition, when the pe
On 07/09/15 18:28, Jo Shields wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Mono requires a (hopefully minor) transition, when the pending version in
> Experimental uploads to Unstable. The ABI on the core library
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Mono requires a (hopefully minor) transition, when the pending version in
Experimental uploads to Unstable. The ABI on the core library was bumped back
with Mono 3.0.6+dfsg2-1 in 2012 and
13 matches
Mail list logo
