On 30/11/15 18:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 27/11/15 17:54, Jo Shields wrote: >> I think this is close to startable, if a transition slot will be available >> soon. >> >> Of the 17 "bad" packages on the release tracker, 2 FTBFS for other reasons >> (and >> are removed from Testing anyway). 3 are in DELAYED and should land this >> weekend. >> 2 are waiting on another DELAYED upload to land this weekend, which should >> make >> them RMable. 1 is in binary NEW, 2 are blocking on a package in NEW. The rest >> already have RM bugs against ftp.debian.org. > > Can you make those bugs block this?
Assuming I didn't fuck it up, done. >> In terms of *actual* work remaining, fsharp needs a new upstream release >> uploading (which is only awkward due to the need to +dfsg it), and xsp needs >> some upstream work to tag/ship a compatible version (i.e. remove the attempt >> to >> build the old ABI entirely), both of which I can deal with on Monday. > > Good. I've uploaded a compatible transition-friendly release of xsp to experimental, it seems to be doing okay on buildd.debian.org >> The only slight wrinkle in the transition is the removal of powerpc as an >> architecture, requiring some massaging of the archive before transitioning >> would >> be possible. > > It'd be good to get that done before the transition starts. Can you ask the > ftp > team to do that? Can I do that without doing a sourceful upload with powerpc removed from the arch list? It was my understanding that the package would end up getting rebuilt on that arch
