Bug#584166: uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage

2010-08-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gaudenz Steinlin [2010-08-18 14:06]: > As the bug is fixed upstream I think a command line option is > appropriate. I don't think adding a command line option in Debian that is not upstream is a good idea. > > That said, we can drop the patch, and do the padding ourselves before > > the mkimag

Bug#584166: uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage

2010-08-18 Thread Clint Adams
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:19:40PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > It would be two more packages in that case AFAIK: uboot-mkimage and > uboot-envtools. Just for the record, I was referring to someone else's suggestion to have a separate binary package for each U-Boot platform/config. As for uboot-

Bug#584166: uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage

2010-08-18 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Excerpts from Thibaut Girka's message of Die Aug 17 20:49:41 +0200 2010: > Le mardi 17 août 2010 à 19:56 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit : > > (Assuming Martin meant approved upstream.) > > > > While I agree that this patch should also be sent upstream I think > > this is not a feature addition bu

Bug#584166: uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage

2010-08-17 Thread Per Andersson
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Clint Adams wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:56:17PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: >> I agree that these three packages should be merged post squeeze. Per >> and Clint you should probably agree on who maintains the package or >> team maintain it. > > As per a

Bug#584166: uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage

2010-08-17 Thread Clint Adams
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:56:17PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > I agree that these three packages should be merged post squeeze. Per > and Clint you should probably agree on who maintains the package or > team maintain it. As per a previous discussion, u-boot Conflicts with and Replaces uboot-

Bug#584166: uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage

2010-08-17 Thread Thibaut Girka
Le mardi 17 août 2010 à 19:56 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit : > (Assuming Martin meant approved upstream.) > > While I agree that this patch should also be sent upstream I think > this is not a feature addition but a bug fix and it's therefore a good > idea to fix the Debian package. Well, it's

Bug#584166: uboot-envtools and uboot-mkimage

2010-08-17 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
[ Dropping debian-release and the RMs as this is not really relevant for them. Adding the u-boot maintainer and the relevant bug report instead. ] Excerpts from Martin Michlmayr's message of Die Aug 17 00:25:20 +0200 2010: > * Per Andersson [2010-08-16 23:15]: > > Regarding uboot-mkimage and the