Le mardi 17 août 2010 à 19:56 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin a écrit : > (Assuming Martin meant approved upstream.) > > While I agree that this patch should also be sent upstream I think > this is not a feature addition but a bug fix and it's therefore a good > idea to fix the Debian package.
Well, it's not really a bugfix, since the bug itself is already fixed (but unfortunately not in FR's NOR). > IMO the fix should not introduce a new command line option but just > add the correct padding whenever it's necessary. Or is there a chance > that images without the padding wich are not correctly aligned by pure > chance will work (better) in some circumstances? The current patch does (add a new command line option), but I'm not sure it is needed (but dropping the option would feel like the past U-Boot bugs would "define" the format), since modified images should work just fine, no matter if U-Boot is fixed or not. That said, we can drop the patch, and do the padding ourselves before the mkimage call. Thibaut Girka.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
