Bug#1099085: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1099085: Bug#1099085: apparmor: FTBFS on riscv64: subprocess.TimeoutExpired

2025-03-03 Thread Bo YU
Hi Christian and intrigeri, On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:10 AM Christian Boltz wrote: > > Hello, > > Am Montag, 3. März 2025, 15:21 schrieb intrigeri: > > Bo YU (2025-03-03): > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:53 PM intrigeri wrote: > > >> Do you want to submit your patch upstream > > >> (https://gitlab.

Bug#1099085: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1099085: Bug#1099085: apparmor: FTBFS on riscv64: subprocess.TimeoutExpired

2025-03-03 Thread Christian Boltz
Hello, Am Montag, 3. März 2025, 15:21 schrieb intrigeri: > Bo YU (2025-03-03): > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:53 PM intrigeri wrote: > >> Do you want to submit your patch upstream > >> (https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/) or should I? > > > > In general, I should forward the patch to upstream. B

Bug#1099085: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1099085: apparmor: FTBFS on riscv64: subprocess.TimeoutExpired

2025-03-03 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:53 PM intrigeri wrote: > > Hi, > > > The fixing is very easy and it works on my local Unmatched board, but I > > am not sure if it's appropriate to send this patch given there is one > > beta hint on uploading. > > The affected version is the one I want to see in Trix

Bug#1099085: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1099085: apparmor: FTBFS on riscv64: subprocess.TimeoutExpired

2025-03-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Bo YU (2025-03-03): > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:53 PM intrigeri wrote: >> Do you want to submit your patch upstream >> (https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/) or should I? >> > > In general, I should forward the patch to upstream. But here I am not > sure if this makes sense or not because thi

Bug#1099085: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1099085: apparmor: FTBFS on riscv64: subprocess.TimeoutExpired

2025-03-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi, > The fixing is very easy and it works on my local Unmatched board, but I > am not sure if it's appropriate to send this patch given there is one > beta hint on uploading. The affected version is the one I want to see in Trixie, so yeah, a patch to fix this is useful and greatly appreciated,

Bug#1099085: apparmor: FTBFS on riscv64: subprocess.TimeoutExpired

2025-02-27 Thread Bo YU
Package: apparmor Version: 4.1.0~beta5-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv64 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, Now apparmor has one FTBFS issue on riscv64 due to timeout on test case: ``` ... ERROR: test_allow_all (