Hello, Am Montag, 3. März 2025, 15:21 schrieb intrigeri: > Bo YU (2025-03-03): > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 6:53 PM intrigeri wrote: > >> Do you want to submit your patch upstream > >> (https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/) or should I? > > > > In general, I should forward the patch to upstream. But here I am > > not > > sure if this makes sense or not because this is just increasing the > > timeout on special architecture. [...]
> If possible, I'd rather not carry this as a Debian-only patch for too > long, so please consider submitting this patch upstream, else I'll > do it. Yes, please submit it upstream. I'd even drop the "if risc64" condition and increase the timeout for all architectures. In case you wonder: the timeout is basically meant as a safety net to avoid a "hangs forever" case (but not for performance checks). The initial timeouts were based on "works for me/on my laptop", and we've since increased the timeout for several tests in test-logprof.py so that it has enough time to finish on all architectures. So if another test needs an increased timeout, no problem ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- <tampakrap> okay I will take the risk! <tampakrap> challenge accepted! * cboltz prepares the "told you so" sign <tampakrap> HA! <tampakrap> second challenge accepted [from #opensuse-admin]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.