Package: open-iscsi
Version: 2.1.8-1
Severity: normal
When trying to connect to an additional iSCSI target/server with the widely
reported command
iscsiadm -m node --target iqn.foo --login
iscsiadm on at least some networks will fail with incorrect error messages:
Logging in to [iface: ifBar
linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages insserv depends on:
ii libc6 2.28-10+deb10u2
insserv recommends no packages.
Versions of packages insserv suggests:
pn bootchart2
-- no debconf information
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S
Package: gitaly
Version: 16.0.7+ds1-2~bpo12+1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When installing gitaly from bookworm-fasttrack, postinst fails with the
following messages:
(Note: This is a rerun, thus override.conf was created by a previous run)
# dpkg --configure gitaly
Setting up gitaly (1
Package: gitaly
Version: 16.0.7+ds1-2~bpo12+1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
In the gitaly package, the main daemon binary /usr/bin/gitaly apparently
has no manpage. Such a manpage would ideally explain what the binary is
and what the daemon command line arguments are. If there is a config
fi
Package: gitlab
Version: 15.10.8+ds1-1~fto12+1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to install gitlab (fasttrack) in a mostly blank bookworm VM,
postinst fails with the following messages:
Setting up gitlab (15.10.8+ds1-1~fto12+1) ...
Could not find gem 'pg (~> 1.4.5, >= 1.4.5)' in
linux-image-5.19.0-0.deb11.2-amd64 is also affected.
linux-image-5.10.0-21-amd64 is not affected
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.0.12-1~bpo11+1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to cp a file from an NFS3 client running kernel 6.0.0 to a file
server running 5.18.16 with nfs-kernel-server (both machines run bullseye),
the cp command complains about "permission denied" and leaves behi
utomated build
daemons such as pbuilder.
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
Source: monitoring-plugins
Version: 2.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to locally rebuild monitoring-plugins on a Buster system with the
build-depends installed, the build actually fails during dh_compress.
This was tried wi
On 20/02/2019 20:24, Mathieu Parent wrote:
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Control: fixed -1 2:4.8.1+dfsg-1
Le mer. 20 févr. 2019 à 18:00, Jakob Bohm a écrit :
On 20/02/2019 14:24, Mathieu Parent wrote:
Hello,
Are you able to reproduce this bug on
with stretch will then have to
await a maintenance window as lots of production systems are talking
to those DCs.
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-bi
xxx:
interface-automatic: no
outgoing-interface: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
outgoing-interface: 2yyy::::::
-- no debconf information
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direc
ba-common 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze9 common files used by both
the Samb
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime
winbind recommends no packages.
winbind suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. ht
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The archive currently seems to contain a file named (without the quotes):
'dists/jessie/elect id,suite_name,signingkeys from suite order by id'
This file name contains charactes that may mess up end user or 3rd party
scripts and one-liners that do not t
ery thorough and trustworthy, even a simple renewal of
an EV
SSL certificate can take more than a month of detailed vetting of our
existing
identity, where they even insist on the ability to verify information
that does
not go in the certificate (and is thus not certified to those who trus
disruptive.
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. http://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2730 Herlev, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
Package: librrd4
Version: 1.3.3-1
Severity: normal
The librrd4 package seems (from the outside) to consist of two very
different parts:
1. A small efficient library for storing collected time series
data. This is used by important system components such as
sensord and is thus likely to be instal
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1
Severity: important
Just reporting that this bug is still present in 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1
P.S.
Supplemental comment on why I agree with the original reporter
that this is an Important class bug (besides the formal
justification that it can break the w
Package: bash-completion
Version: 1:1.2-3
Severity: normal
The current "stable" version of bash-completion does not do
command completion in many of the places where something else
prefixes the command, for example:
su johndoe -c sor
sh -c sor
bash -c sor
fakeroot sor
LC_ALL=C sor
etc. etc.
Exp
On 9/27/2011 9:10 AM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Jakob Bohm writes:
Package: binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
I can't find a package like that in sid, nor can I find a trace of it in
the removal log. May I ask where the package originates from?
The bug is currently filed against a package that doe
assword login to the SMTP host.
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/WISEMO/jb/.reportbugrc (censored):
reportbug_version "4.12.6"
mode advanced
ui text
realname "Jakob Bohm"
email "jb-debb...@wisemo.com"
smtphost "
Package: binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
Version: 2.20.1-16
Severity: minor
The ARM (cross) assembler arm-linux-gnueabi-as issues the
"-mimplicit-it=mode" warning/error incorrectly in a number of
cases:
1. In ARM code, when thumb-portability warnings about
recommended use of IT are enabled with "-m
Hi,
Sorry for butting in on this bug, but as an affected user I was wondering
when preliminary packages would be available either in
squeeze-proposed-updates
or somewhere else.
So far, all I can see is talk, talk and a failed upload of 3.5.8 to
backports,
but nothing that looks like it will
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:51:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 06:39:35AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > Since several years back, kernel.org has provided linux tarballs
> > with both 3 part (e.g. 2.6.35) and 4 part (e.g. 2.6.35.7) vers
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Severity: normal
In the specified squeeze version of this package (2.6.32-23),
debian/README.source tells the user to run debian/bin/genorig.py.
Unfortunately, that file is not marked as executable in the freshly
unpacked source package, requiring the user to
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Severity: normal
Since several years back, kernel.org has provided linux tarballs
with both 3 part (e.g. 2.6.35) and 4 part (e.g. 2.6.35.7) version
numbers in their filenames.
But if genorig.py is run with a 4-part versioned tarball such as
linux-2.6.35.7.tar.
Package: kernel-package
Version: 11.015
Severity: minor
The debconf template for shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader
talks nonsense about grub being installed and a postinst hook
being present, even though the script (postinst) that invokes this
template no longer tests for those conditions
Package: kernel-package
Version: 11.015
Severity: important
Justification: Affects the ability to ease of installing kernel
images when lilo (a very common choice) is the boot loader.
In the postinst generated by kernel-package, the test around line
152 that sets the internal variable $explicit_d
Package: dia
Version: 0.96.1-7.1
Severity: minor
The file doc/custom-shapes from the source package should be
packaged in usr/share/doc/dia/ or /usr/share/doc/dia-common, it
contains important end user instructions without which it is
virtually impossibly to add custom shapes to dia. This is
espe
Package: ttf-thai-arundina
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/ttf-thai-arundina.hints tells the rest of Debian
to look for the installed fonts in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-thai-arundina/arundina/, but they are
actually install
Package: ttf-radisnoir
Version: 0.9b-1.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
/etc/defoma/hints/ttf-radisnoir.hints still lists the modified
variants of this font, which are no longer in the package. This
causes defoma to generate bogus references (such as dangling
symlinks) to those variants and may cau
Package: ttf-okolaks
Version: 0.5-2.1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/ttf-okolaks.hints tells the rest of Debian to
look for the installed fonts in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-okolaks/, but they are actually
installed in /usr/share/fonts/true
Package: ttf-malayalam-fonts
Version: 1:0.5.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
/etc/defoma/hints/ttf-malayalam-fonts.hints tells the rest of
Debian to look for one of the installed fonts in
AnjaliOldLipi-0.730.ttf, but it is actually installed in
AnjaliOldLipi.ttf .
Because Debian packages are suppos
Package: defoma
Version: 0.11.10-0.2
Severity: normal
There always seems to be packages in Debian that list wrong or
otherwise non-existing paths or file names in the "begin" lines in
their .hints files. For instance, lenny contains at least 11 such
broken .hints files.
Currently, defoma-font si
Package: ttf-junicode
Version: 0.6.15+20080123-1
Severity: important
The Defoma hints file ttf-junicode.hints lists a different set of
font files than those actually installed by the package. This has
two serious detrimental effects:
1. The fonts that are not listed in ttf-junicode.hints will
Package: ttf-inconsolata
Version: 001.009-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/ttf-inconsolata.hints tells the rest of Debian
to look for the installed font in Inconsolata.ttf, but it is
actually installed in Inconsolata.otf.
Because Debian packa
Package: ttf-dzongkha
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/ttf-dzongka.hints tells the rest of Debian to
look for the installed font in the file Jomolhari.ttf, but it is
actually installed in a file named Jomolhari-alpha3c-0605331.ttf
Package: ttf-beteckna
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/t1-betecna.hints tells the rest of Debian to
look for the installed fonts in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-beteckna/, but they are actually
installed in /usr/share/fonts/truet
Package: t1-teams
Version: 4.12+nmu2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/t1-teams.hints tells the rest of Debian to look
for the installed fonts in /usr/share/fonts/type1/teams/, but they
are actually installed in /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1/ like m
Package: t1-oldslavic
Version: 4.12+nmu2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/t1-oldslavic.hints tells the rest of Debian to
look for the installed font in /usr/share/fonts/type1/oldslavic/,
but it is actually installed in /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1
Package: t1-cyrillic
Version: 4.12+nmu2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
/etc/defoma/hints/t1-cyrillic.hints tells the rest of Debian to look for
the installed fonts in /usr/share/fonts/type1/cyrillic/, but they are
actually installed in /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type
Reopen, bug still there.
I just rechecked tonight, and the bug is still there:
$ wget
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/squeeze-proposed-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages.diff/Index
This file lists the following diff files:
2009-06-18-0902.36.gz
2009-06-19-0304.17.gz
2009-06-19-0856.31.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
On ftp.debian.org (or at least all the mirrors I checked and in
/ls-lR.gz), some of the latest patch files are missing from
/dists/squeeze-proposed-updates/main/binary-xxx/Packages.diff/
This has been seen for both xxx=i386 and xxx=amd64 and may also
affec
Package: openoffice.org
Severity: important
Currently the openoffice.org packages are all built from a
single giant source package. This means that any change to any
part of the suite will cause new versions of all openoffice.org
binary packages for all architectures. That is more than 1
Gigabyt
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 7.0.25-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security, sarge, upstream, fixed-upstream
Justification: user security hole (and won't install)
Upstream for this package (Adobe) has released versions 7.0.70 and
9.0.48 as security updates for version 7.0.25. Like Debian, Adobe
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 9.0.31.0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security, etch, upstream, fixed-upstream
Justification: user security hole (and won't install)
Upstream for this package (Adobe) has released version 9.0.48 as a
security update for version 9.0.31.
There is also an upstream se
Package: dak
Severity: normal
The database schema used by katie presumes that no package
related file can belong in more than one location throughout the
archive. This affects .orig.tar.gz files but is not really
limited to those, nor should any fix be.
Furthermore when an upload requests that a
Package: ftp.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #416429
It looks like these files are incorrectly hardlinked!
As of today, the following indexes are still wrong, specifying
wrong information about the current Packages file (see the
signed Release file for the correct size and hash value):
http://ftp.d
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.6.19
Severity: normal
When I install an updated version of the python packages (as part of normal
system updating with aptitude), the dpkg run fails complaining about
"already exists: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/apt/__init__.py ->
/usr/share/pycentral/./__in
Package: base-files
Version: 3.1.14
Severity: normal
The "Updated" GPL-2 text introduced in base-files 3.1.14 and
still present base-files 3.1.15 doesn't just update the FSF
postal address. It also contains 2 unrelated changes to the
license which have not been approved by every copyright holder
o
Package: bzr
Version: 0.9~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.12
Policy section 5.6.12 lists the permitted characters in package
version numbers, '~' is NOT on the list, and until less than 14
days ago all packages in the archive were compliant with that
rule. I know for certain tha
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:26:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > To work around the "breaks whole system" issue, the following
> > transition plan is proposed:
> >
> > 1. Before uploading the fixe
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.44.2
Severity: critical
Tags: security patch
Justification: breaks the whole system
The SHA256 checksums recently added to Packages files are wrong
due to a porting error when the sha256 implementation code was
imported from the Linux kernel sources to the apt source tree
Package: libbsf-java
Version: 2.3.0+cvs20050308-6
Severity: serious
Justification: no source, breaks debmirror etc.
Due to the issue described in Bug #341858 (an existing bug
against ftp.debian.org), when libbsf-java was moved from contrib
to main, the .orig.gz file was not included in pool/main
Package: ttf-mgopen
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Bug #303972 was not fixed in 1.1-1 as claimed in the upload, I cannot reopen
that bug because it was archived by the bts.
Testing hint: install the package symlinks, then after installing your
package run
# symlinks -r / | sort |
Package: ttf-paktype
Version: 0.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The defoma hints file in the ttf-paktype package states the wrong path to
the font file. This causes defoma to silently create symlinks and other
data pointing to the wrong path. This also makes the font unavailable to
any and a
Package: ttf-indic-fonts
Version: 1:0.4.5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
After ttf-indic-fonts was split into multiple packages, defoma fails to
correctly register some of the fonts (this is a silent failure, there is no
error message but all the generated symlinks are dangling). This is not the
tags 213883 +patch
quit
While setting up a chroot with all Debian font packages, I ran across
this bug myself and created a patch for the broken hints file, thus
attached here:
diff -Naur old/ttf-xfree86-nonfree-syriac.hints
new/ttf-xfree86-nonfree-syriac.hints
--- old/ttf-xfree86-nonfree-syriac
Correction: My patch to the config script was wrong, and won't work, please
ignore that and use only the patch for en_DK.
You may wish to make your own patch for the list of supported locale/charset
combinations though, but I obviously couldn't do that part right.
--
This message is hastily wri
tags 303966 +patch
quit
Here is a patch for the hints file
P.S.
While you are at it, please rename the file to match the package name,
as a matter of cleanliness.
diff -Naur old/ecfonts.hints new/ecfonts.hints
--- old/ecfonts.hints 2005-08-21 20:41:57.0 +0200
+++ new/ecfonts.hints 2
title 267433 "defoma .hints file broken due to spaces in font names"
tags 267433 +patch
tags 267433 -unreproducible
quit
I have investigated this issue while setting up a chroot with almost all the
font packages installed. It turns out that defoma fails if the .hints file
for a font specifies a f
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-2
Followup-For: Bug #320042
Since some other people in the project are trying to force-feed 2.6.12 onto
users machines, the inability to install the 2.6.12 docs along with prior
docs for comparison is kind of a show-stopper.
Are there any workarounds to i
Package: locales
Version: 2.3.5-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch l10n
As an EU-member (but not a Euro country) most Danish users have an ongoing
need to refer to the Euro and amounts expressed in Euros (in addition to
referring to their own currency "Kr"). This is even more common for those
who use
I am reopening this bug, this IS a bug and it has NOT been fixed.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 08:48:41AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Package: gcc-4.0
> > Version: 4.0.1-2
> > Severity: important
>
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-2
Severity: important
gcc 4.0 fails to compile the following 3 line sample:
struct bar;
void baz(struct bar*);
void foo(struct bar[]);
gcc 3.4 and older do not complain.
The issue is that gcc-3.4 and older realize that [] in a parameter is the
same as * and accep
Package: xorg-x11
Severity: minor
The X development packages currently have incomplete descriptions such as:
Header files and a static version of the SM library are provided by this
package.
.
See the libsm6 package for further information.
While this seems to be an increasingly common pract
Package: bash
Version: 3.0-15
Severity: minor
Currently, bash completion assumes that less can handle any file while zless
can handle only .gz files. This is wrong, zless can handle both gzipped and
plain files, less cannot handle gzipped files (unless lessopen or similar is
used).
An important
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:53:42AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 11, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Having udev disable itself on reboot and leaving the system
> > non-functional is not an acceptable solution. Most systems have
> I disagree, this is what udev has
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 10:32:16AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:15:35AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:49:22AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > > >
...
> u
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:57:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 11, Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That was not the information published by Marco in his packaging changelog
> > and in his blog. The bug is reported against the Debian package, I b
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:49:22AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:56:52AM +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> >
> > Am I understanding you correctly when I read it as saying that kernel 2.6.12
> > (a point release in the "stable" branch)
>
> Ther
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 01:02:11AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 10, Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It seams that if getting udev 0.6x quickly rewritten to support all
> > udev-based kernels in one version is too much work or too controversial, yo
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:23:03PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> retitle 317332 udev 0.060-1 should be used with a >= 2.6.12 kernel
> thanks
>
> On Jul 07, Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Justification: breaks the whole system, will bre
Package: udev
Version: 0.060-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system, will break upgrades from sarge
According to the NEWS entry provided in the udev 0.060-1 package itself,
this version of udev is NOT COMPATIBLE with any kernel version prior to
2.6.12.
Kernel 2.6.12 has NOT Y
Package: roxen4-doc
Version: 4.0.325-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (fails to install)
roxen4-doc failed to install, complaining that it did not know what database
to contact. That sounded like obvious nonsense (I was installing the
*documentation*, not a database clien
severity 285398 wishlist
tags 285398 sid
thanks
I originally tagged this bug as important in the hope of a quick
rename before the package would initially hit sarge, and/or before
it got included in the release of sarge. As this is now long
overdue, I am downgrading this bug to a wishlist item, a
tags 302854 patch
thanks
Note, I have not tested this patch!
--- debian/libcgicc-doc.doc-base.org2005-05-08 22:03:11.804375000 +0200
+++ debian/libcgicc-doc.doc-base2005-05-09 06:50:11.680330112 +0200
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Section: Apps/Programming
Format: HTML
-Index: /usr/share/doc/li
Package: ec-fonts-mftraced
Version: 1.0.10a-1
Severity: important
In postinst, the call to mktexlsr is not protected with || : like it is in
postrm. This causes package installation to fail if tetex-bin is not
installed locally (the fonts ARE useful on their own, as the fonts may be
used by files
Package: chrony
Version: 1.20-7
Severity: important
The latest release of the chrony .deb files try to send a mail to root
during configure to inform about the configuration of the package. This
causes a number of problems:
1. It fails if mailx is not installed (this happens in my case).
Package: modutils
Version: 2.4.27.0-1
Severity: important
The i386 version of this .deb file has a nonsense mode for /usr/share/man
and its subdirs: drw-rw-rw-.
This has two severe consequences:
1. If modutils happens to be the first package to create the dir, the dir
is no longer accessible
Package: libnjb-doc
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: normal
The package libnjb-doc contains a manpage named errors(3) . This is an
extremely generic name which implies a high risk of causing a conflict with
unrelated packages. On my system it happened to conflict against
libcoin40-doc, but there could b
Package: python-4suite-doc
Version: 0.99cvs20041008-5
Followup-For: Bug #301566
A second look at the package reveals that there is no html documentation in
the package at all, only a few text files and a lot of regression tests.
I respectfully suggest adding the docs or simply removing the packag
Package: libcgicc-doc
Version: 3.2.3-2
Severity: important
Setting up libcgicc-doc (3.2.3-2) ...
cannot create dhelp file '/usr/share/doc/libcgicc1-dev/html/.dhelp': No such
file or directory
dpkg: error processing libcgicc-doc (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exi
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:19:30PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jakob Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Is this feature seldom used, so we do not care much about it; or is
> >> it often used, and so possibly worth retaining?
> >
> > I
not necessarily the only or best one.
Side note:
As a security specialist I am increasingly annoyed by this kind
of loud shouting about security pseudo-bugs drowning out real
security discussions and frequently forcing vendors to make
extremely ill-advised system changes that actually harm securi
Package: dancer-ircd-doc
Version: 1.0.36-2
This bug was closed with reference to 1.0.36-2, but that is
the broken version!
The problem is in the two template files installed as
/usr/share/doc-base/dancer-*
Those two files contain incorrect paths for the HTML
documentation (dancer-oper-guide/
Package: fwatch-modules-src
Version: 0.1-alpha-3
Severity: minor
Neither the package description nor the documentation in the
package states which kernel versions this module is supposed to
compile against.
I tried to build against kernel 2.6.10 (as part of a complete
kernel recompile) and it fai
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 04:33:07PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> Not an option. The helper programs in /usr/lib/gettext are used
> my msginit at least, which is part of the gettext package itself.
>
Ah, sorry. Didn't know that. I was confused but the fact that
the libgcj depend
Package: gettext
Version: 0.14.1-8
Severity: normal
The new gettext package released today includes the files needed to
also use gettext with Java programs (thanks). Unfortunately this
had a small side effect: The entire gettext package now declares a
dependency on libgcj, which is not needed (or
89 matches
Mail list logo
