Hi Adam,
Are you still seeing this bug in efivar 0.23-2?
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
OS Architect
Linux Engineering
Dell | Client Software Group
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:08:58PM -0600, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre"
* Package name: tpm2-tss
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Will Arthur
* URL : https://github.com/01org/TPM2.0-TSS
* License
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:25:28PM -0600, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre"
* Package name: tpm2-tools
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Gang Wei
* URL : https://github.com/01org/tpm2.0-tools
* License
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:58:19PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:14:35AM +0200, pollux wrote:
On 04/19/2016 01:29 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:43:24 +0200 Pierre Chifflier wrote:
retitle 702255 ITP: efitools -- Tools to manipulate EFI secure boot k
It turns out this is the same bug as
https://github.com/rhinstaller/pesign/issues/18
--
Jared Domínguez
OS Architect
Linux Engineering
Dell | Client Software Group
My apologies for missing this. I just uploaded 0.112-1. Could you check
if it's fixed there? If not, you should file a bug upstream, as 0.112-1
is unpatched upstream code.
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
OS Architect
Linux Engineering
Dell | Client Software Group
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:29:04AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Package: pesign
Version: 0.110-2
Severity: wishlist
0.111 seems to be out, can this be packaged please?
Hi Tollef,
Yes, it's on my to-do list.
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
OS Architect
Linux Engineering
Dell | Client Software G
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 06:16:58AM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
retitle 617820 RFP: biosdevname -- takes a kernel device name as an argument,
and returns the BIOS-given name.
noowner 617820
tag 617820 - pending
thanks
Hi,
A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging biosdevname. Unfort
Are you still seeing this issue with libefivar0 0.20-4 and efibootmgr
0.12-3?
--
Jared Domínguez
Infrastructure Software Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Are you still seeing this issue with libefivar0 version 0.20-4?
--
Jared Domínguez
Infrastructure Software Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Can you run this and send the output of it (/root/efibootmgr.*)?
sudo strace -o /root/efibootmgr.$RANDOM efibootmgr -b 0016 -B
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
Infrastructure Software Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.de
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:05:14AM -0500, Phil wrote:
I found that I saw the same issue, but when I rebooted, efibootmgr 0.12-1
with efivar 0.20 worked fine for me.
Rebooting didn't solve the problem for me. I've also made plenty of
reboots yesterday and they didn't solve the problem for me, re
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:32:53PM -0500, Phil wrote:
Thank's for your fast reply.
On 06/24/2015 05:31 AM, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
Do you see the same issue with 0.15-3?
Yes, downgrading libefivar to 0.15-3 and efibootmgr to version 0.11
resolves the problem too. So I guess libefivar
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:01:03PM -0500, Robert Lange wrote:
Package: efibootmgr
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Until about 1 month ago, efibootmgr was able to modify and delete boot menu
items. I do not know exactly when it started failing, but I just noticed it
today.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:45:51PM -0500, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:01:03PM -0500, Robert Lange wrote:
Package: efibootmgr
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Until about 1 month ago, efibootmgr was able to modify and delete boot menu
items. I do
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:14:33PM -0500, Phil wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:00:56 +0200 Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
root@neopili:/home/ricardo# grub-install
Installing for x86_64-efi platform.
efibootmgr: Boot entry 001A not found
efibootmgr: Could not delete boot variable: Success
** Warni
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:49:33AM -0500, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
2015-06-03 18:25 GMT+02:00 D. Jared Dominguez :
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:49:09AM -0500, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
[...]
However, I have packaging for the 0.4 release almost ready, and you
can expect an update of this package very
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:49:09AM -0500, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Hi!
2015-06-03 9:23 GMT+02:00 Daniel Jared Dominguez :
Package: appstream-glib
Severity: wishlist
I need at least appstream-glib 0.3.5 for packaging fwupd
(https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd) into Debian unstable.
Awesome! Thank
Ricardo,
Okay, I've poked around some, and it seems like efibootmgr won't even
*build* with the most recently released libefivar0. There are a bunch of
changes to efibootmgr upstream (dp branch in the efibootmgr git repo)
that look like they resolve this, but since those changes aren't merged
What's the output of "sudo efibootmgr -v"?
--
Jared Domínguez
Infrastructure Software Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:56:37AM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
(Just filling in details of my thoughts here, not arguing for or against
however you guys decide to name things.)
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:12:11AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:48 -0500, D. Jared Dominguez
Okay, well, I talked to Peter on IRC. He pointed out that:
- While there may be other platforms with firmware update mechanisms
that work in Linux, they're fringe.
- It's in Fedora as fwupdate already, so having a different name is
confusing.
- Its name doesn't currently collide with other
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:54:41PM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
>>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
>If I read that correctly, #773412 fixed i386 on an i386 kernel. As you can
>see in the dumps
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:48:23PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
I'm not convinced that this doesn't break the use case in #773412
[1] since you're lo
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
Package: efivar
Version: 0.15-3
Severity: serious
I'm afraid the patch 07-num_bits.patch breaks the case of 32-bit userland
on a 64-bit kernel. As far as I know, this is how i386 would get installed
on any non-ancient machine if d-i
I second as adding these will add firmware needed for Broadwell SST DSP
(IntcSST2.bin).
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Looks like this bug also needed this, which was already in 0.11.0-1:
https://github.com/vathpela/efibootmgr/commit/301c0628f7fa7333791d2b5d79eb8e02fc848ee7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Let me try sending a proper debdiff this time. :)
diff -Nru efivar-0.15/debian/changelog efivar-0.15/debian/changelog
--- efivar-0.15/debian/changelog2014-11-03 10:26:48.0 -0600
+++ efivar-0.15/debian/changelog2014-12-17 22:28:23.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+efivar (
I maintain efibootmgr and efivar in Debian and would find such a list
very useful.
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
control: tags -1 + jessie
control: tags -1 + sid
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: tags -1 + jessie
control: tags -1 + sid
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
control: tags -1 + jessie
control: tags -1 + sid
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hrmph. There was a 32-bit issue in 0.9.0-1 that was supposed to be fixed
in 0.9.0-2:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764797
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764796
Any chance you can test with efibootmgr from unstable? I've looked at
the changes upstream and
Jan,
My apologies for not seeing this bug report earlier. I just noticed it
this morning thanks to Bastien. I reviewed the patch. It looks like it
should be fine for at least restoring previous behavior, so I passed it
along to Peter Jones, the upstream maintainer, to see whether he concurs
s
Control: fixed -1 0.9.0-2
There are newer versions of efibootmgr in both jessie and sid. Please
test 0.9.0-2 in jessie, as it should resolve this issue (at least the
one Colin references).
I'm closing this bug report for now since the reporter hasn't replied in
nearly a month anyway. Please
Actually, never mind. Peter broke out your patch and applied it
upstream. I've just uploaded efivar 0.15-2. Please verify that it works
correctly on your system.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:58:20AM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote:
Jan,
I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it.
Jan,
I passed your patch upstream. Peter Jones is looking at it. It'd
probably help him to know more details about what system you're on,
though, like what make/model this is and probably an strace if you can.
--Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Grou
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:14:59PM -0500, Jan Echternach wrote:
Package: libefivar0
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Upgrading libefivar0 from version 0.10-5 to 0.12-1 causes a segmentation
fault when running efibootmgr without arguments (I tried it with
The efibootmgr I just uploaded (0.9.0-2) should be multi-arch aware.
Please, if you can, verify that it works as expected for you.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:22:31AM -0500, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Package: efibootmgr
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: normal
efibootmgr package in debian is not marked a
I just uploaded new efi{var,bootmgr} packages with these patches.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:30:21AM -0500, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Package: efibootmgr
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
32bit version (i386 package) of efibootmgr has several bugs which makes
it unusable at least with large (>2Ti
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:08:55PM -0500, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:52 -0500, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
I'm just about to package efibootmgr 0.9.0 and efivar 0.12. I will add
armel to the architecture list.
Excellent, thanks!
Ian.
FYI, I got around to finishing th
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:53:19PM -0500, Ian Campbell wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 20:49:51 +0100 Ian Campbell wrote:
As of version 2.02~beta2-13 the grub-efi-arm-bin package now depends on
efibootmgr. Since grub-efi-arm-bin is built for armel as well as armhf that
means we need efib
Anyone willing to sponsor?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:15:34AM -0500, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
I would like to take over maintaining this package in Debian and need
someone to sponsor me. I've CCed Colin in case he's interested in
sponsoring. :)
I've packaged and tested bi
I'm happy to comaintain this, the sfcb and wsman stuff with you. I'm
hopefully going to be a Debian Maintainer soon so may be able to help
with uploading.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:55:41PM -0500, Kent Baxley wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kent Baxley
* Package name: cim-
I would like to take over maintaining this package in Debian and need
someone to sponsor me. I've CCed Colin in case he's interested in
sponsoring. :)
I've packaged and tested biosdevname 0.5.1 based on the latest package
in Ubuntu. Aside from the newer upstream version, other changes include
FYI, upstream has accepted all the patches. I've included them in
efibootmgr 0.7.0-2, which should hopefully be uploaded shortly.
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Thanks. I cleaned up and broke out your patch into logically separate
patches for submission upstream. I have one question, though. This one
is somewhat unrelated to the rest of your patch:
--- efibootmgr-0.7.0/src/include/scsi_ioctls.h 2014-04-01 22:53:43.0
+0400
+++ efibootmgr-0.7.
Thank you.
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Adam Conrad wrote:
Package: efivar
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu utopic ubuntu-patch
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Pull
Per the discussion for bug 725457, please verify if efibootmgr 0.6.1-3
in unstable resolves this issue.
Thanks,
Jared
--
Jared Domínguez
Server OS Engineering
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:43:50PM -0500, Jan Henke wrote:
Hi,
what is the status of this bug? Is 0.6.x expected to migrate to Testing
soon?
Either a 0.6.x upstream version or applying the patch in bug #741235 is
required to install Debian on generation 2 Hyper-V VMs. The current
version can br
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Jared Dominguez
* Package name: ledmon
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Intel
* URL : http://ledmon.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Enclosure LED Utilities
ledmon and
53 matches
Mail list logo
