On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 12:34:35AM -0500, Adam Lazur wrote:
> Gary Kline ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Gotta agree here. The huge gain that I see for this
> > project is the unparalleled strength of the BSD krenel
> > with all the Debian goodies (and as much of linux-land
> > as ca
Gary Kline ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Gotta agree here. The huge gain that I see for this
> project is the unparalleled strength of the BSD krenel
> with all the Debian goodies (and as much of linux-land
> as can be ported over).
I agree.
> Be nice to offer as much
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 06:19:05PM +0100, Smörk wrote:
> >What configuring style should we use?
> >
> > (_) BSD
> > (_) SysV
>
> The one Debian use :) It's BSD-Kernel with Debian Userland. I'm using
> file-rc, it's simple and cool...
>
Gotta agree here. The huge gain that I see for
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 06:19:05PM +0100, Smörk wrote:
> >What configuring style should we use?
> >
> > (_) BSD
> > (_) SysV
>
> The one Debian use :) It's BSD-Kernel with Debian Userland. I'm using
I don't think that would be too useful, then. Why replace all
security-improved utilites that
>What configuring style should we use?
>
> (_) BSD
> (_) SysV
The one Debian use :) It's BSD-Kernel with Debian Userland. I'm using
file-rc, it's simple and cool...
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:18:23AM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> OpenBSD: A good, secure base. Beneficial in establishing a Debian
> distribution as the ultimate secure OS. Ported to a wide variety of
> platforms.
But it lacks many features found in FreeBSD, for example, such as SMP
and libc's
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 10:21:28AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Another poll question:
>
> What general utilities/tools (such as ls, netstat, who) should we use?
>
>(_) GNU
>(_) BSD
Ok, good idea.
> I'd vote for BSD. I only see Debian/BSD as a regular BSD that uses Debian
> package s
I just don't see what we add to the BSD world if all we are is another
port of BSD. Free/Net/OpenBSD already provide the BSD kernel, BSD C
runtime library, and BSD utilities.
I think the only thing that makes sense for a Debian project would be
a BSD kernel using the GNU C library and the GNU too
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> So, I am wating for any possible add-ons or improvements to the
> poll questions.
Another poll question:
What general utilities/tools (such as ls, netstat, who) should we use?
(_) GNU
(_) BSD
Some points to think about:
- some utilities ma
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 05:33:42PM +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> At last, I've got some spare time to create some pages devoted to the
> Debian/BSD project, and also a voting.
> They are not yet availble to the public, but I'll get them online
> in one or two days, if you guys decide that the
At last, I've got some spare time to create some pages devoted to the
Debian/BSD project, and also a voting.
They are not yet availble to the public, but I'll get them online
in one or two days, if you guys decide that the poll questions is ok.
So, I am wating for any possible add-ons or improveme
11 matches
Mail list logo
