On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 21:14:27 + Robert Millan wrote:
> On 05/02/2014 20:50, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Another possibility would be to make an arch:kfreebsd-any to depend on
> > (or maybe recommend) it, or make an arch:any package to depend on (or
> > maybe recommend) it only on kfreebsd-any.
>
>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
>> On 14/08/14 18:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > Now, I think there are several questions to answer:
>> > 1. What were the reasons for having arch-dependent dhcp clients?
>>
>> I'd speculate because udhcpc
Petr Salinger (2014-07-15):
> >Nearer the time, if we still only have a BETA or RC in sid and serious
> >bugs, we may decide to just stay with 10.0. If a BETA or RC is
> >*already* in testing, we may want to ask the release time about getting
> >a pre-approved unblock when the final release comes
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:2.1.20-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package needs an update for the transition to xorg-server 1.16
which happened in July.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xserver-xorg-video-nv/news/20140715T163918Z.html
Your pa
I've finished testing these hypotheses:
On 20/08/14 03:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I think all we need to do is add the expected-uninstallable packages to
> /var/cache/anna/exclude
That works. I think on each architecture, any uninstallable udeb
(according to http://d-i.debian.org/edos/#unst
Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
> But it *is* also relevant here. Each udeb in our image takes up space
> for the extracted files, but also I suspect _considerable_ space in
> cdebconf data. Addressing this may already fix the ENOSPC error, and if
> we can keep the anna excludes up-to-date, we
Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
>> But I am still asking: how is it that partman-iscsi is being installed
>> into a kfreebsd d-i image (by APT I believe)? I'd expect it to be
>> uninstallable due to missing dependencies. Could that be a bug, or is
>> it a known limitation?
Thanks. I've meanw
Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
> On 20/08/14 01:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > If you're trying to insinuate I/we deliberately broke kfreebsd-* by
> > introducing partman-iscsi, [...]
>
> No, I was not insinuating that.
>
> But I am still asking: how is it that partman-iscsi is being installe
On 20/08/14 01:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If you're trying to insinuate I/we deliberately broke kfreebsd-* by
> introducing partman-iscsi, [...]
No, I was not insinuating that.
But I am still asking: how is it that partman-iscsi is being installed
into a kfreebsd d-i image (by APT I believe)?
Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
> On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > [...] If a
> > single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to
> > time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status
> > is far too brittle.
>
> The fixed-size d-i initrds had
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #756553 [kfreebsd-kernel-headers] kfreebsd-kernel-headers missing
/usr/include/net/if_pflog.h
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
756553: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756553
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 important
tcpdump has kindly worked around this; I can't find other packages
blocked by it, so I don't think this is RC-severity any more, but still
important nonetheless.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@li
Control: severity -1 important
libpcap has kindly worked around this; I can't find other packages
blocked by it, so I don't think this is RC-severity any more, but still
important nonetheless.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@li
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #750836 [kfreebsd-kernel-headers] machine/atomic.h broken, missing
__compiler_membar macro
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
750836: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow
On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...] If a
> single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to
> time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status
> is far too brittle.
The fixed-size d-i initrds had to be carefully sized for kfreebsd wheezy.
We d
Steven Chamberlain (2014-08-20):
> On 14/08/14 18:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Now, I think there are several questions to answer:
> > 1. What were the reasons for having arch-dependent dhcp clients?
>
> I'd speculate because udhcpc from busybox is very small, and
> isc-dhcp-client-udeb was ab
Taking a very critical view to kfreebsd's available time and resources,
we might leave this totally unaddressed for jessie and leave it as an
errata again. Yes that's shoddy, but it is a mostly cosmetic issue.
It happens due to CAM changes in kfreebsd-9 and later. I think the only
serious effect
On 14/08/14 18:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Now, I think there are several questions to answer:
> 1. What were the reasons for having arch-dependent dhcp clients?
I'd speculate because udhcpc from busybox is very small, and
isc-dhcp-client-udeb was about 2 MiB. It targets (currently only builds
On 19/08/14 00:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [ I'm adding -release@ to the loop. I tried to refrain from mentioning
> my concerns in the Jessie Beta 1 announce, that's why I used a quite
> neutral wording, but let's be honest: kfreebsd-* is looking bad right
> now. ]
I was drafting a quite long rep
Hi,
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:49, pentako...@openmailbox.org said:
>> I know the product is not support under Debian / kFreeBSD but i would
try :
That will be interesting; it is surprising that some applications work
on GNU/kFreeBSD although the developer didn't try it.
>> gpg: WARNING: using in
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:49, pentako...@openmailbox.org said:
> In the installation i have this message and fail :
>
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
Well, read the FAQ - although I am not sure that our new FAQ still has
an
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, pentako...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> This is my first post.
>
> I'm trying to install Yunohost (A very nice install and play, debian based
> hosting distribution : https://yunohost.org/ ) in a jail Debian kFreeBSD.
>
> You can download the ISO or install with a scr
Hi guys,
This is my first post.
I'm trying to install Yunohost (A very nice install and play, debian
based hosting distribution : https://yunohost.org/ ) in a jail Debian
kFreeBSD.
You can download the ISO or install with a script from a fresh Debian.
I know the product is not support under
23 matches
Mail list logo
