Petr Salinger <petr.salin...@seznam.cz> (2014-07-15): > >Nearer the time, if we still only have a BETA or RC in sid and serious > >bugs, we may decide to just stay with 10.0. If a BETA or RC is > >*already* in testing, we may want to ask the release time about getting > >a pre-approved unblock when the final release comes. > > I am afraid, that we have to decide our goal much earlier. > Especially w.r.t kfreebsd-kernel-headers (it b-d on kernel source). > Iff we go for 10.1, we should ship pre-betas into sid during August.
Is this going to happen? Anyway, not communicating with either debian-boot@ or debian-release@ about (planned) kernel updates right before a freeze doesn't seem a very nice plan. On a slightly related note, looking at the debian-bsd@ DDPO page[1], I see some packages are still numbered 8.x or 9.x; does that mean they're not working with kfreebsd-10? 1. https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
