Hello!
> b) NetBSD kernel
> c) FreeBSD kernel
I'd take one of these two. NetBSD because of it's portability and
FreeBSD because of speed and the support of SMP.
But NetBSD will get SMP, too, so it is probably the better choice.
> c) mostly GNU utilities + some very system dependent user
Im just a user who would like to say what i think :)
1:
b) NetBSD kernel
It does not have as many features as the FreeBSD kernel
has but i like it better. FreeBSD feels more like a bloat.
Darwin is alot of FreeBSD and NetBSD + NetBSD userland, that is not
the choice here. If we choose NetBSD we ca
1: c) FreeBSD kernel (most features)
2: c) use GNU utilities
(if you don't know answer, fill in c :)
Kind regards,
Arjen Krap
Andreas Krennmair writes:
This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
1) Which kernel?
a) OpenBSD kernel
b) NetBSD kernel
c) FreeBSD kernel
d) Darwin kernel
c, a, or b in that order of preference. FreeBSD seems to be the most
featured for i386, which is the m
Note: I'm just a user; not a Debian contributer.
1) Which kernel?
a) OpenBSD kernel
b) NetBSD kernel
c) FreeBSD kernel
d) Darwin kernel
On this issue I'm mostly neutral, although if I had to choose I'd lean
towards FreeBSD, for no particular reason other than I get the
impression it's t
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:49:46PM +0200, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
>
> 1) Which kernel?
> b) NetBSD kernel
>
NetBSD has similar goals to Debian, at least when it comes to multi-
platform compatibility. Debian will do we
Disclaimer: I am not a Debian contributor in any way, merely a
loyal user.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:49:46PM +0200, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
>
> 1) Which kernel?
> a) OpenBSD kernel
> b) NetBSD kernel
> c) FreeBSD
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:49:46PM +0200, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
>
> 1) Which kernel?
> a) OpenBSD kernel
> b) NetBSD kernel
> c) FreeBSD kernel
> d) Darwin kernel
b), NetBSD seems to have less of an attitude aga
It does not make as much sense to me to make a Debian distribution around
the FreeBSD or Darwin kernels, as they are fairly platform specific. That
said, both the OpenBSD and NetBSD offer similar portability as the rest of
the Debian GNU/Linux currently does.
I would put forth that starting with t
(Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 04:49:46PM +0200) Andreas Krennmair :
> This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
>
> 1) Which kernel?
> a) OpenBSD kernel
> b) NetBSD kernel
> c) FreeBSD kernel
> d) Darwin kernel
(b) or (c)
I really don't think (a) and (d) is suitable
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 09:56:13AM -0600, ray p wrote:
> What would be the point? If you want the userland that the flavor of
> BSD that you like comes with why not just use it? After all they all
> tend to be at least as "free" as Debian in any case. I would think the
> whole point of this project
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:52:35PM +0800, Nero wrote:
> 1) either B or C - NetBSD for the portability
> factor, FreeBSD for speed.
>
> 2) C. This would make it pretty much Debian, with
> a BSD kernel.
>
1) -> AFAIK FreeBSD is by far more widespread than the others.
2) -> Definit
Den 26 Jun 2001 16:49:46 +0200 skrev Andreas Krennmair:
> This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
>
> 1) Which kernel?
> a) OpenBSD kernel
> b) NetBSD kernel
> c) FreeBSD kernel
> d) Darwin kernel
>
b
I think NetBSD would be a good start.
But why limit to
What would be the point? If you want the userland that the flavor of BSD that
you like comes with why not just use it? After all they all tend to be at least
as "free" as Debian in any case. I would think the whole point of this project
would be to get the GNU toolset with a BSD kernel and the D
1) either B or C - NetBSD for the portability
factor, FreeBSD for speed.
2) C. This would make it pretty much Debian, with
a BSD kernel.
Begin Original Message
From: Andreas Krennmair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:49:46 +0200
To: Debian-BSD Mailinglist
Subject: vote
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:56:31PM +, David Dorgan wrote:
> > 1) Which kernel?
> > a) OpenBSD kernel
> > b) NetBSD kernel
> > c) FreeBSD kernel
> > d) Darwin kernel
i vote for netbsd, but theres no reason why they cant all be
supported later..
> > a) only the userland that came wit
vote
>- Original Message -
>From: Andreas Krennmair
>To: Debian-BSD Mailinglist
>Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 12:49 AM
>Subject: vote
>
>
>This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
>1) Which kernel?
> a) OpenBSD kernel
> b) NetBSD kernel
B (tick)
1) OpenBSD kernel. AFAIK or can tell on all other fronts they are about the
same but the OpenBSD people have been over their's with a fine toothed comb.
2) c The main reason I'm interested in this at all is to get the tool set that
comes with Debian GNU/Linux with a BSD kernel. This seems to me t
> 1) Which kernel?
> a) OpenBSD kernel
> b) NetBSD kernel
> c) FreeBSD kernel
> d) Darwin kernel
Well I use them all daily, I am using openbsd as a desktop for a year and a
half now.
Basically I think openbsd could be a little more compact, easier to change.
The install process, with our c
This is a vote what system that we should take as basis for our project.
1) Which kernel?
a) OpenBSD kernel
b) NetBSD kernel
c) FreeBSD kernel
d) Darwin kernel
2) What userland
a) only the userland that came with the chosen kernel
b) "native" userland + some GNU utilities
c) mostly
> That's fine provided you're willing to do enough work to gain
> credibility for that position.
Ok, well I see only one way to see, is Andreas Krennmair now the project lead
(for now, give him a chance?)
>I would love to influence several
> decisions that are critical to this project, but I do
21 matches
Mail list logo
