Hi all,
I'm being heavily bitten by this one as well and I'm mildly shocked to see it
crop up this late in the release cycle. I'm not going to hide that I believe
this ought to be reassigned to base-files. I'll try to elaborate below.
Santiago Vila wrote:
[...]
> In this particular case, I belie
ila wrote:
> I'm going to reply to Julien first, then to Michael.
>
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:35:14 +, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > I agree this should be fixed in base-files.
>
> Bugs should be fixed wher
Apologies if I may be repeating information as we were concurrently working on
those messages.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:34:06 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
[...]
> I just expect debootstrap maintainers to cooperate with the release
> managers to ensure that the version in stable is able to deboots
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:07:24 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>
> > I'm hoping this is not going to be too philosophical, so I'll enlist the
> > facts
> > first (please let me know if I got any of them wrong):
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 16:36:42 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
[...]
> For example, your interpretation would force base-passwd to lose its
> essential flag, because it can't provide its core functionality only
> when in unpacked state. Then, according to policy, base-files and
> *every* other packag
Hi Santiago, All,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 13:39:06 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
[...]
> I already tried to fix this problem yesterday in base-files by making
> minor changes. It didn't work.
>
> And it didn't work because contrary to what some people in this thread
> has suggested, this issue has
[ BCC'ing Santiago, Holger, Adam, Cyril ]
Hi all,
I'm refraining from quoting the preceding mails as most of you will have those
in their inbox, and I'd rather summarise the situation right here:
At least Santiago's and my opinion diverge on whether base-passwd is presently
in line with policy o
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 22:44:40 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:06:07PM +0000, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
> > 1. Determine whether base-passwd is in line with policy on providing its
> > functionality as an "essential" package
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 1.67
Severity: wishlist
Usertags: goto-cc
During a rebuild of all packages in a clean sid chroot (and cowbuilder+pbuilder)
the build failed with the following error. Please note that we use our research
compiler tool-chain (using tools from the cbmc package), which pe
Package: debian-installer-netboot-images
Version: 20130613+deb7u2.b1
Usertags: goto-cc
During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using cowbuilder
and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
[...]
sha256sum: debian-installer_20130613+deb7u2+b1_amd64.deb.sha256sum:
10 matches
Mail list logo
