Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:00:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372734: base-config: solution the problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Disclaimer:
This E-mail does NOT contain an explaination of common sense.
Neither an advice for a reallity check.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[ in my words: energy drain ]
> So, there is only two ways this can e
On 6/14/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
If any powerpc people care, I build both 1.1.6 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:23:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:29:24AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[ d-i team member asks opinions of d-i team members ]
> > My recommendation:
> >
> > Do a while something completely di
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Disclaimer:
>
> This E-mail does NOT contain an explaination of common sense.
> Neither an advice for a reallity check.
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> [ in my words: energy drain ]
>
> > So
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:38:47AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:23:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:29:24AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> [ d-i team member asks opinions of d-i team members ]
>
> > > My recommendation:
> > >
> > > D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, it is clear that the current resolution is aimed at me being under the
> control of Frans and meak and submissive, or i will continue to be punished
> thus. This clearly indica
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:54:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Which architectures include support for i2o_block?
> >
> > It's available on amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc. I tested it on amd64.
>
> And dpt_i2o is not available on 64 bit, so if we're adding i2o_block to
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:53:47AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Well, it is clear that the current resolution is aimed at me being under the
> > control of Frans and meak and submissive, or i will continue to be punished
>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:22:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Gaining back the confidence would have been a very long process and
> A very long process ? This is clearly the ridiculous part. And what is frans
> going to do to regain my confidence ?
Your comments throughout this painful (for e
Btw, I've noticed that discover updates its module list from a master copy in:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/modules-list
Perhaps i2o_block should be there as well?
--
Robert Millan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Departamento de Asistencia Técnica
Oficina central: (+34) 902 888 345
Asistencia técn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:52:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > [ in my words: energy drain ]
> >
> > > So, there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:50:58PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:16:09AM -0700, Archive Administrator wrote:
> > netcfg_1.23_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> > along with the files:
> > netcfg_1.23_amd64.
On Friday 16 June 2006 09:50, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> For the d-i rescue system, I thought this was handled by discover. Am
> I right? There's i2o_block support in discover, although not working on
> my hardware. I think it just needs a new entry for this PCI id.
No, device detection a
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:37:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:22:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Gaining back the confidence would have been a very long process and
>
> > A very long process ? This is clearly the ridiculous part. And what is frans
> > going to d
On Friday 16 June 2006 10:56, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Why has amd64 1.23?
Upload was to testing, not unstable. Has to do with AMD64 archive move.
pgpps1zHTrhQk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:41:32AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:52:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > [ in my words: energy drain ]
The updated package still has not made its way into proposed-updates, so
the bug still exists for me.
Any estimated date when this will happen?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:34:20AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 16 June 2006 10:56, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > Why has amd64 1.23?
>
> Upload was to testing, not unstable. Has to do with AMD64 archive move.
Aah, to testing.
Thanks for elaborating.
GSt
signature.asc
Description: Digital
#On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:12:44AM +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
#> The updated package still has not made its way into proposed-updates, so
#> the bug still exists for me.
reopen 372734
stop
> Any estimated date when this will happen?
euh, no
Geert Stappers
who was to eager to close this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:12:44AM +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> #> The updated package still has not made its way into proposed-updates, so
> #> the bug still exists for me.
> reopen 372734
Bug#372734: Template #30 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/base-con
Not sure I'll be attending the meeting scheduled for Saturday either
(weekends are always a big "?" for me).
Here's a summary of the ongoing activities related with g-i:
* Fonts
---
ATM some fonts are not yet available as official udebs, but
as tarballs fetched at compile time from [1]; this i
I tried apt-get update & apt-get -u dist-upgrade today, but the new
package isn't in there. :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 16 June 2006 09:50, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> > For the d-i rescue system, I thought this was handled by discover. Am
> > I right? There's i2o_block support in discover, although not working on
> > my hardware. I think
I'm not able to attend the meeting this weekend, so following Davide's
example, I'll also post a status report for integration of crypto and
partman:
o partman-crypto
the version of partman-crypto which is in unstable/testing is ancient and
lacks the proper dependencies. A new version (5) has
On Friday 16 June 2006 14:45, David Härdeman wrote:
> Looking at the TODO list, partman-auto-crypto needs better
> integration with partman-auto-lvm and partman-crypto. Most importantly,
> shared parts need to be split out into shared scripts rather than
> duplicated, this will also remove confus
On Friday 16 June 2006 05:59, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I know it's very late and I apologize for this. I leave up to Frans
> decision to either have the meeting anyway or reschedule it for the
> next week.
I'm in a similar situation. I was just reminded that I have a daytrip
tomorrow and I'm no
On Fri, June 16, 2006 14:58, Frans Pop said:
> On Friday 16 June 2006 14:45, David Härdeman wrote:
>> Looking at the TODO list, partman-auto-crypto needs better
>> integration with partman-auto-lvm and partman-crypto. Most importantly,
>> shared parts need to be split out into shared scripts rather
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> There is *NO* technical reason which warrant his action, and the only reason
> he does it is to humiliate and punish me.
You're the only one here who thinks that's a punishment, let alone
"humiliating". If you would like to setup your
Package: installation-reports
(This mail is a combination of installation-report and status overview for
the S/390 list.)
Mostly thanks to the efforts of Bastian Blank, S/390 has now made the
switch from 2.4 to 2.6 in the installer. The installer now also uses
partman instead of partitioner an
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:33:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There is *NO* technical reason which warrant his action, and the only reason
> > he does it is to humiliate and punish me.
>
> You're the only one here who thinks that
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:38:47AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:23:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:29:24AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>
>> [ d-i team member asks opinions of d-i team members
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> And what has that to do with anything ? I have no interest in going into this
> hate-game, i want the situation solved, and be able to commit as any normal DD
> would.
You have that already. There are >1000 DD's, and only a small porti
On Friday 16 June 2006 15:33, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There is *NO* technical reason which warrant his action, and the only
> > reason he does it is to humiliate and punish me.
>
> You're the only one here who thinks that's a punishmen
On Friday 16 June 2006 15:39, Frans Pop wrote:
> * DASD configuration
> This was solved (worked around rather) by adding the dasd-modules udeb
> to the initrd so that initial udev runs will load them. The real
> solution would be to run depmod and rerun udev as part of dasd
> detection.
Bastian: W
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 373629 grave
Bug#373629: failed to do autopartitioning completely (tries the cd device :( )
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Hello,
a while ago I filed a few patches to the BTS to make d-i work on the
native 64-bit ppc64 port (http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org).
Frans Pop kindly asked me to collect all the necessary ppc64/d-i
related changes and to present a summary to make a decision about
ppc64 integration eas
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> Btw, I've noticed that discover updates its module list from a master copy in:
Didn't realize they actually implemented that..
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/modules-list
>
> Perhaps i2o_block should be there as well?
It is, since you added it to a lis
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:11:08PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Bastian: What do you think of the attached patch for this (untested)?
I think this needs to be done in a more general way after anna installs
any module.
Bastian
--
The sight of death frightens them [Earthers].
-- Kras
On Monday 12 June 2006 23:25, Joey Hess wrote:
> hppa: update udebs and build/config from 2.6.16-1 to 2.6.16-2
I've pinged Kyle to update these, but -14 is not available for hppa yet
(FTBS). Should be fixed when -15 is uploaded. Kyle will update udebs
after that.
> sparc: update udebs and build
> I have no idea what you're trying to say with "moral harcelement", but no,
I think the right word is "harassment". "Harcèlement" is the French
word.
"harcèlement moral" is now an accepted reason for employees to sue
their employers in France (and I would guess in many other countries)
to defin
Because of very last minute commitments for myself, as D-I meetings
moderator, and Frans Pop, as D-I release manager, we have decided to
reschedule the Debian Installer team meeting to Saturday June 24th 16:00:
> The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
> Saturday June 24th
On Friday 16 June 2006 18:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:11:08PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Bastian: What do you think of the attached patch for this (untested)?
>
> I think this needs to be done in a more general way after anna installs
> any module.
I guess you mean at th
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2006-06-05
Severity: serious
Hello,
I tried to install Debian-Etch on my Notebook:
Maxdata Mbook 1200X
Athlon XP 2400+
HDD: Fujitsu MHT2040AT (40GB)
But when I should partition the HDD, Partman shows me no partition and no
HDD.
I did the following steps
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:38:47AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:23:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:29:24AM +0200, G
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > And what has that to do with anything ? I have no interest in going into
> > this
> > hate-game, i want the situation solved, and be able to commit as any normal
> >
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:05:57PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I have no idea what you're trying to say with "moral harcelement", but no,
>
>
> I think the right word is "harassment". "Harcèlement" is the French
> word.
>
> "harcèlement moral" is now an accepted reason for employees to s
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:54:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#370667: I2O modules for 64bit platforms
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
kernel-wedge_2.23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-wedge_2.23.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.23.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.23_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Joey Hess wrote:
> In nic-extra-modules, the amd64 package diverges from kernel-wedge by
> not including these modules:
>
> smc-ultra tlan ne ne2 ni5010 ni52 ni65 lne390 lp486e ibmtr lance hp-plus
> eepro e2100 82596 ac3200 at1700 cs89x0 depca 3c501 3c503 3c505 3c507 3c509
> 3c515 3c523 3c527 eexp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 374001 parted
Bug#374001: Etch-Installtion | Partman doesn´t recognize partitions => no
installation possible
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `parte
choose-mirror_2.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_2.03.dsc
choose-mirror_2.03.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.03_all.udeb
choose-mirror-bin_2.03_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
FYI: The status of the tasksel source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.47
Current version: 2.48
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To U
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 02:13:11AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> The patch applied cleanly, I got a working udeb from it.
>
> To make klibc-ipconfig transmit the DHCP vendor class "d-i"
> and get the DHCP preseeding filename in a text file, it needs the
> attached patch.
Sweet.
So was that a
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:26:12AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:43:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > Okay. I've had a preliminary play with ipconfig over the weekend. Seems
> > > relatively straightforward to slot it into netcfg's dhcp.c. What
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Anyway, I suggest you do as so many people have suggested before. Keep
>> working, send patches and try really hard to stay on everybodies good
>> side for a while. Yes, it is more tr
Accepted:
kernel-wedge_2.23.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.23.dsc
kernel-wedge_2.23.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.23.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_2.23_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_2.23_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Accepted:
choose-mirror-bin_2.03_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror-bin_2.03_i386.udeb
choose-mirror_2.03.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.03.dsc
choose-mirror_2.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.03.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.03_all.udeb
t
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:31:49PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Anyway, I suggest you do as so many people have suggested before. Keep
> >> working, send patches and try
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:32:59 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352924: fixed in kernel-wedge 2.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:40:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > And what has that to do with anything ? I have no interest in
> > > going into this hate-game, i wan
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:50:50PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Friday 16 June 2006 15:33, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > There is *NO* technical reason which warrant his action, and the only
> > > reason he does it is to
For reference, here's the mail I sent to Sven regarding his complaints
on the way d-i has been handled. I think it's been referred to indirectly
enough that nothing's served by not having it available for public review.
- Forwarded message from Anthony Towns -
From: Anthony Towns
Subject
my friends
Dear Family,
Just wanted to write you, and let you know, how the degree program I tried out
went.
Well, six weeks later, I graduated, finished & received my Ma_sters D_egree
with no study required and 100 percent verifiable.
Yeah mom, I know you and Dad doubted it at first, but this
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:44:15AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:40:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:09:48PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > And what has that to do wit
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:41:58AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:50:50PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > On Friday 16 June 2006 15:33, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > There is *NO* technical reas
What's up?
Dear Family,
Just wanted to write you, and let you know, how the degree program I tried out
went.
Well, six weeks later, I graduated, finished & received my Master:s Degr:ee
with no study required and 100 percent verifiable.
Yeah mom, I know you and Dad doubted it at first, but this
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:46:25AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For reference, here's the mail I sent to Sven regarding his complaints
> on the way d-i has been handled. I think it's been referred to indirectly
> enough that nothing's served by not having it available for public review.
I would a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 290667 silo-installer
Bug#290667: silo: Default config problem - initrd
Bug reassigned from package `silo' to `silo-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
(CC'ing to d-private as the same misconception is seen there.)
On Saturday 17 June 2006 03:41, Anthony Towns wrote:
> As far as everyone else is concerned, this is a disagreement between
> Sven and Frans; and if Frans isn't willing to pretend that there's no
> problem and give Sven access to subve
70 matches
Mail list logo
