Package: base-config
Severity: wishlist
This bug is merely a TODO for post-sarge, although it would be great
to have this fixed even before sarge's release:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/11/msg00279.html
My suggestion would be to add a prompt before the tasks are
displayed, asking w
I cannot figure out how base-config uses debconf. No matter whether
I reconfigure debconf/priority or override the seeting with
$DEBIAN_PRIORITY, base-config always uses the priority used for the
installation.
Also, it seems that starting base-config (even with 'new') from the
command line always
Christian Perrier wrote:
I indeed have no preference at all. In case of a team work, the only
requirement is making sure that all people with commit access agree on
the work method. In the case of translations, this is most often
having commited files reviewed or get unwritten agreement in case of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 November 2004 09:37, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> well, by now the biggest problem is that only a few files have been
> translated in italian. It's hard to have got problems when only 20
> files have been translated.
Another important problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 November 2004 07:07, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.07.2147 +0100]:
> It *is* possible that I may have activated choose-mirror. Could you
> confirm that once this component is loaded, it will be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 270304 important
Bug#270304: netcfg: netcfg/wireless_wep template contains falsehood
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 270304 d-i
Bug#270304: netcfg: netcfg/wireless_wep template contains falsehood
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 November 2004 07:22, martin f krafft wrote:
> Okay. base-config also does not support it, so the way to do it is
> to run pppconfig or pppoeconf once base-config finished?
base-config does support ppp configuration (not pppoe) which will
> >So, if the italian team and Ottavio agree on having commit access for
> >him, no problem on my side.
>
> I'd like to get commit access, if possibile.
OK. The only thing you need is create yourself an account on Alioth if
you don't already have one and then tell me you account name.
http://ali
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.1001 +0100]:
> On Monday 08 November 2004 07:07, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.07.2147 +0100]:
> > It *is* possible that I may have activated choose-mirror. Could you
> > confirm that once this com
> So to sum up, what _I_ want (and I guess that most Norwegians (and for that
> case Danies, Swedes and others people from 'small' languages), computer
> literate enough to start installing debian would agree with this) to achieve
> in as few keypresses as possible is to have
> - Communication
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:56:09AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: base-config
> Severity: wishlist
>
> This bug is merely a TODO for post-sarge, although it would be great
> to have this fixed even before sarge's release:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/11/msg00279.html
>
Christian Perrier wrote:
So, if the italian team and Ottavio agree on having commit access for
him, no problem on my side.
I'd like to get commit access, if possibile.
OK. The only thing you need is create yourself an account on Alioth if
you don't already have one and then tell me you account nam
also sprach Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.1012 +0100]:
> Would it not make more sense in the task frontend to have an
> additional button or something to skip this step ? This way, the
> normal install with tasks will not have one more step, and it is
> still possible to do as you wan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> package netcfg netcfg netcfg-dhcp netcfg-static
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: netcfg-static netcfg netcfg-dhcp
> tags 270304 + pending
Bug#270304: netcfg: netcfg/wireless_wep templat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> package discover1-data discover1-data discover1-data-udeb
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: discover1-data-udeb discover1-data
> tags 255705 + pending
Bug#255705: discover1: looks for th
|--==> Joey Hess writes:
JH> [1 ]
JH> Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>it would be nice to be able to preseed the netcfg-dhcp behaviour in
>>case of failure (no dhcp server found).
>>
>>Currently it seems that netcfg-dhcp prompts the user asking whether he
>>wants to go on without dhcp.
On Nov 08, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > What am I building ppp-udeb for, then?
> Well we would like to support it eventually, it's a matter of getting a
> frontend written and integrating it with the ret of the installer
> though.
There /is/ a configuration fronte
Quoting Ottavio Campana ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've done it, but I haven't found out how to join the debian installer
> project. I've sent an email to Joey Hess to join the project. Is
> there something more to do?
As I wrote, just give me your alioth usernameas I can also
validate you for co
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:38:32AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> From netcfg-dhcp.templates:
>
> netcfg/dhcp_failed Template: netcfg/dhcp_failed
> Type: note
>
> don't know how to handle type "note"..
You want to look at netcfg/dhcp_options.
--
Joshua Kwan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 280122 kbd-chooser
Bug#280122: Translations for mac/usb keyboards are confusing
Bug reassigned from package `console-data' to `kbd-chooser'.
> severity 280122 serious
Bug#280122: Translations for mac/usb keyboards are confusing
Severity set to
Package: partman-lvm
Version: 2004.11.08 daily builds of d-i.
Severity: important
As said, i created (on powerpc/pegasos) a raid 1 group, and the resulting
partition on the raid volume is automatically marked as lvm. I don't remember
this happening on raid 0 setups, but will have to test again.
|--==> Joshua Kwan writes:
JK> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:38:32AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>From netcfg-dhcp.templates:
>>
>>netcfg/dhcp_failed Template: netcfg/dhcp_failed
>>Type: note
>>
>>don't know how to handle type "note"..
JK> You want to look at netcfg/dhcp_options.
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.0946 +0100]:
> > Well we would like to support it eventually, it's a matter of getting a
> > frontend written and integrating it with the ret of the installer
> > though.
> There /is/ a configuration frontend. What's missing?
How do you use
Hi,
I just completed the second phase of installation successfully in 3
hours (with all development packages deselected/not installed).
I have 1 remark concerning the use of colour in the "Debian package
selection" screen and in aptitude. My Mac only has a black and white
display, and both the
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.1006 +0100]:
> base-config does support ppp configuration (not pppoe) which will
> be run automatically if no network was configured in 1st stage
> (e.g. because no network card was found).
Good and well, this is nice. However, I cannot seem to
On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 21:50 -0500, Huston wrote:
> my net install won't mount my scsi cdrom drive in my sun e250 server.
> I am stuck at that point in the install.
Why would you need a CDROM to do a netinstall?
--
Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BeezNest
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
You should try to not ask questions for which you already have the
answer ;-)
Also, see the manual (para about pppoe added as of yesterday :-)
On Monday 08 November 2004 13:00, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.1006 +0100]:
> > base-config does suppor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 November 2004 13:06, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 21:50 -0500, Huston wrote:
> > my net install won't mount my scsi cdrom drive in my sun e250 server.
> > I am stuck at that point in the install.
>
> Why would you need
also sprach Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.1321 +0100]:
> You should try to not ask questions for which you already have the
> answer ;-)
You know it yourself probably that sometimes the information between
lines is much easier to see than what's actually there. Damn, I am
embarassed n
On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 13:35 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 08 November 2004 13:06, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 21:50 -0500, Huston wrote:
> > > my net install won't mount my scsi cdrom drive in my sun e250 server.
> > > I
Christian Perrier wrote:
As you have an usb-keyboard, the list that is shown _is_ correct for you.
No it is not. There is more than just UI/localisation pb here. If you
choose "Macintosh USB français" the keyboard layout is plain wrong = mac
layout (wrong mapping of alt, altGr & a bunch of other
Christian Perrier wrote:
...
The conclusion is:
-We should change kbd-chooser for showing the AT keymap list for
i386/kernel 2.6
-the bug is a blocker for a release as it makes all 2.6 installs with
non US USB keyboard unusable (Atl key not working, wrong layout as Mac
and PC USB keyboards have di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joey,
As you know, this weekend I build a mini.iso to test keyboard-chooser. You
know I had problems because of something wrong with ./stamps or ./tmp
dirs.
I found the same solution just before your email :-)
Today I am testing with a new vers
On Monday 08 November 2004 14:43, Fabrice LORRAIN wrote:
> Reading you next mail, it seems you already did quite some tests with
> french USB keyboard. Thanks for your time.
> Do you guys still wants me to go through the following tests ?
>
> > -Boot with "linux26 DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium"
> >
> > -
On Wednesday 03 November 2004 16:36, Alessandro Amici wrote:
> > > [...] it looks like an irq problem, the fact that the d-i uses a
> > > 32bit kernel on a 64bit can well be to be the trigger,
> >
> > A similar problem was fixed for PReP systems a while ago. Before
> > that, I worked around it b
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20041024 from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
uname -a: Linux urmel 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Mo Nov 8 15:57:34 CET 2004
Method: I installed from the netinstall-CD for i386 (sn
Your message dated Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:48:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280285: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Hi Malte,
I found a message in the debian mailing lists about a 4400/200:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/03/msg05918.html
You said that boot.img booted for you.
How do you get this to boot? The only thing I've been able to boot on
mine is the hfs-only image from woody.
My install go
Package: nobootloader
Version: 1.02
Severity: minor
For i386, the dialog that displays the instructions for setting up the
bootloader, shows "the /vmliuz kernel" instead of "the
vmlinuz-2.4.27-1-386 kernel".
So, please remove the leading slash and add the full version info.
Cheers,
FJP
--
T
Is there some meaning to getting a blue or red screen at bootup of the Sarge
CD? Either way the install seems to go along fine.
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On the advice of a friend I am offering up a wee suggestion to y'all.
After puzzling through two frustrating installers (Debian NP which uses
a Morphix installer that holds you so firmly by the hand that you can't
put /tmp on its own partition; then a woody vanilla cd that couldn't
find my ethe
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 09:19:12AM -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Hi Malte,
>
> I found a message in the debian mailing lists about a 4400/200:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/03/msg05918.html
>
> You said that boot.img booted for you.
>
> How do you get this to boot? The only thing
Frans Pop wrote:
> However, when I test with 2.6, with exactly the same iso, and look
> in /var/lib/dpkg/status, I see ___version 1.06___ installed and I see
> debugging statements from this weekend in the log!!!
>
> So, AFAICT, there is something seriously wrong with the buildscripts.
> Someho
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 05:05:42PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Package: nobootloader
> Version: 1.02
> Severity: minor
>
> For i386, the dialog that displays the instructions for setting up the
> bootloader, shows "the /vmliuz kernel" instead of "the
> vmlinuz-2.4.27-1-386 kernel".
Because /vmlin
Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> No, I didn't try to preseed. What variable/value should I try with
> exactly?
>
> From netcfg-dhcp.templates:
>
> netcfg/dhcp_failed Template: netcfg/dhcp_failed
> Type: note
>
> don't know how to handle type "note"..
d-i netcfg/dhcp_failed note ignore
--
see shy j
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Debian-install sarge pre-rc2
uname -a: Linux athens 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: Mon Oct 25 06:30:43 2004
Method: Internet install from ftp.us.debian.org, CD media
Machine: Custom built i6
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-08 17:05]:
> For i386, the dialog that displays the instructions for setting up the
> bootloader, shows "the /vmliuz kernel" instead of "the
> vmlinuz-2.4.27-1-386 kernel".
> So, please remove the leading slash and add the full version info.
Why? Using
Michael Lueck wrote:
> Is there some meaning to getting a blue or red screen at bootup of the
> Sarge CD? Either way the install seems to go along fine.
If you get a red screen you are experiencing a bug documented in the
errata. The only problem should be the annoying red screen.
--
see shy jo
martin f krafft wrote:
> I cannot figure out how base-config uses debconf. No matter whether
> I reconfigure debconf/priority or override the seeting with
> $DEBIAN_PRIORITY, base-config always uses the priority used for the
> installation.
>
> Also, it seems that starting base-config (even with '
also sprach Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.1914 +0100]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/joey>DEBIAN_PRIORITY=medium base-config
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# debconf-show debconf
* debconf/frontend: Readline
* debconf/priority: high
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# DEBIAN_PRIORITY=low base-config
Configuring the
Christian Perrier wrote:
> The conclusion is:
>
> -We should change kbd-chooser for showing the AT keymap list for
> i386/kernel 2.6
>
> -the bug is a blocker for a release as it makes all 2.6 installs with
> non US USB keyboard unusable (Atl key not working, wrong layout as Mac
> and PC USB keyb
Your message dated Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:28:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280322: debian install report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reopen 274609
Bug#274609: base-config: support random (vs. sequential) access to menu items
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
> I've access to both USB french PC keyboards and USB french Mac
> keyboards. If someone point me to tests to do I can do them tonight.
>
> For Christian, if you live near Paris and want to have a closer look at
> a Dell GX280, you're welcome at the Université de Marne-la-Vallée.
>
> Otherwise
also sprach Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.1932 +0100]:
> Ok this is due to a bug in base-config making it load the priority
> if the system was installed with d-i. Will fix.
Thanks!
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and
martin f krafft wrote:
> I tried it also on a normal system (the above is a VMware install,
> should not make a difference), and in a pbuilder chroot. The problem
> does *not* exist in the chroot (even though DEBIAN_* was unset).
Ok this is due to a bug in base-config making it load the priority i
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/20041029/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux white-cloud 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-10-30 till 2004-11-1 (see below)
Method:
Boot netins
base-config_2.53.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.53.3.dsc
base-config_2.53.3.tar.gz
base-config_2.53.3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
base-config_2.57_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.57.dsc
base-config_2.57.tar.gz
base-config_2.57_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Thanks for the reply,.
So how do I actually get the boot.img to boot?
I've set up open firmware (version 2.0) to have the display as output
and the keyboard as input, and auto-boot to false.
But, I've tried what seems every combination of boot fd or boot floppy
to no avail. I'll usually get bac
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:01:38PM -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
> Thanks for the reply,.
>
> So how do I actually get the boot.img to boot?
>
> I've set up open firmware (version 2.0) to have the display as output
> and the keyboard as input, and auto-boot to false.
>
> But, I've tried what seems
Accepted:
base-config_2.57.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.57.dsc
base-config_2.57.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.57.tar.gz
base-config_2.57_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.57_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 274609
Thank
Accepted:
base-config_2.53.3.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.3.dsc
base-config_2.53.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.3.tar.gz
base-config_2.53.3_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.53.3_all.deb
Closing bugs: 274609
Thank you for your contri
Your message dated Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:02:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274609: fixed in base-config 2.53.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Monday 08 November 2004 18:42, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Why? Using the generic symlink is much better than hardcoding a
> specific version.
Hmmm. Yes, forgot about the symlink.
I have two objections to using the symlink though.
- If we install GRUB automatically we also refer to the real nam
partman-lvm_29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_29.dsc
partman-lvm_29.tar.gz
partman-lvm_29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Accepted:
partman-lvm_29.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_29.dsc
partman-lvm_29.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_29.tar.gz
partman-lvm_29_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_29_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to De
Joey Hess wrote:
> The following issues are contributing to delaying the rc2 release:
Update to the update, we have:
> - A new netcfg is needed to properly support WEP. It's built on all
>arches except sparc.
Turns out it didn't work. An even newer netcfg needs some testing and
has not even
Hello,
Could someone with knowledge in architectures that use the GPT disk labels
please have a look at this, and tell me if it is worthwhile to add this patch ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
- Forwarded message from Matt Domsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-da
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 279927 + wontfix
Bug#279927: debian-installer-manual: cosmetic improvements to XML
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a:
Date: <11/8/04>
Method:
Machine:
Processor: P-III 933 Mhz
Memory: 512 meg
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate belo
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: normal
The manual does not explain how to burn the iso image as a bootable
cd-rom. I'm not one to burn cd-roms regularly (in fact I just
installed cdrecord to burn one) and it was not at all obvious at first
how to do burn at all (though that's Not Your
tags 279927 + wontfix
thanks
Although I appreciate the work done for this patch, I don't feel it should
be applied ATM.
Applying the patch would mean loads of work for all translators to see if
any real changes were made, and I don't feel we should do that in the
run-up to RC2.
We will keep th
Frans Pop wrote:
...
I doubt that will work with kernel 2.6. There won't be a list for AT-type
keyboards as IIRC you don't have an AT-type keyboard connector.
However, I have prepared an iso [1] for testing a hack that I hope will
solve the problem. We would appreciate it very much if you could
Thanks Joey! That is one awesome bug! LOL! Someone "accidently" call rand() to
get the BGcolor? ;-)
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
hi,
had with lot of iso from last week problems to install sarge on my pc,
buisinnes and netinstallimage.
sometimes coreutils was not found, sometimes debconf was not found,
sometimes something else.
with the buissines image of yesterday had no problems to install it.
but now i wanna install
I found that the syntax has been
changed to:
linux netcfg/disable_dhcp=true
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:25:39PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 08 November 2004 18:42, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Why? Using the generic symlink is much better than hardcoding a
> > specific version.
>
> Hmmm. Yes, forgot about the symlink.
>
> I have two objections to using the symlink
Wim Yedema wrote:
> "To burn, type the following:
> cdrecord -eject -v dev=X,Y,Z -data -pad sarge-i386-netinst.iso
I don't know why you would need -pad to burn a bootable CD. In my
experience, the above simplifies to:
cdrecord sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Sometimes I need to configure cdrecord to us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 November 2004 23:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is it possible to do dselect/aptitude for X-Free 86 4.4.0 ?
This is indeed th wrong list for this. Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] next time.
Debian does not yet have X-Free 4.4, so you can not insta
Keith Parkansky wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: 2 weeks ago from debianvendor.org>
Unfortunatly from this I cannot figure out what version you used, short
of buying my own copy. The version of the installer is given if you
presee f2 at the boot prompt.
> When I use 'linux netcfg/use_dhcp=fals
Your message dated Mon, 8 Nov 2004 23:25:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280347: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Hello Fabrice,
On Monday 08 November 2004 21:49, you wrote:
> Nop, works for 2.4 not for 2.6. I just got a choice for USB keyboard
> with 2.6.
Thank you very much for your quick response. Unfortunately I can't test
the image myself very much as I don't have the hardware.
I have debugged togethe
Status update for translators.
On Sunday 07 November 2004 14:35, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hmmm. In fact you are being shown exactly the same list of keymaps.
> The confusion is caused by the translations, which imply that the
> keymaps are for 'macintosh usb' keyboards.
It turns out there is a lot more
Hi Wade,
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:01:38PM -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
> I've set up open firmware (version 2.0) to have the display as output
> and the keyboard as input, and auto-boot to false.
>
> But, I've tried what seems every combination of boot fd or boot floppy
> to no avail. I'll usual
Package: arcboot-installer
Version: 1.0
arcboot uses /proc to decide whether to install the IP22 or IP32
binary. Unfortunately, /proc is not mounted in the chroot when
arcboot is installed so it will always install the IP22 binary. Below
is a patch which works for me. Thiemo, ok to apply?
Ind
tag 280372 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 01:35:07 +
Source: arcboot-installer
Binary: arcboot-installer
Architecture:
For for the record:
Thiemo made some modifications (putting the mount outside of the set,
and removing the || true).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
arcboot-installer_1.1_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
arcboot-installer_1.1.dsc
arcboot-installer_1.1.tar.gz
arcboot-installer_1.1_mips.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 280372 + fixed
Bug#280372: installs IP22 binary on IP32
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
Accepted:
arcboot-installer_1.1.dsc
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_1.1.dsc
arcboot-installer_1.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_1.1.tar.gz
arcboot-installer_1.1_mips.udeb
to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_1.1_mips.udeb
Announcin
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2004 01:55:32 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fixed in NMU of arcboot-installer 1.1]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Debian installer pre-rc2 official
uname -a: Linux mangoo 2.6.8-1-k7 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:47:47 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-11-07 around 12PM
Method: Netinstall CD. Using network internet connection and IP assigned
us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log:
> - usb-kbd.c: several fixes:
> - Fix recognition of usb keyboards (actually add to and return the list)
> - Add recognition of usb keyboards behind an usbhid
> - Display AT-keymaps for usb keyboards on i386 and powerpc (prep & chrp)
> - Added some debug outp
Joey Hess wrote:
> keyboard type at: present: false
> keyboard type usb: present: false
Hmm, ok, why does it think usb is not present? This is obviously the
reason behind displaying a random hunk of memory, since buf is not
initialised. I don't understand the hack of setting present to false for
Joey Hess wrote:
> Hmm, ok, why does it think usb is not present? This is obviously the
> reason behind displaying a random hunk of memory, since buf is not
> initialised. I don't understand the hack of setting present to false for
> a non-usb keyboard that you added in the patch, but notice that i
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> FWIW, I'm inclined not to let this block the release if it only affects
> i386, because 2.6 kernel is out of the normal install path and this
> seems like something that could be errataed as a case where you can just
> use 2.4 or expert mode instead, and no
Package: tasksel
Severity: wishlist
> And four little words in the text of that screen would have totally
> cleared it up.
Not four160, roughly...:-)
D-I is translated to 40 languages so any change needing more
translations is currently unlikely as we are too close to a
release. You can't i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 280328 -1
Bug#280328: [i386][20041029][netinst] PPP problems
Bug 280328 cloned as bug 280400.
> reassign 280328 pppconfig
Bug#280328: [i386][20041029][netinst] PPP problems
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `pppconfig'.
> ret
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2004 07:15:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280385: install report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
