Re: lvm on raid

On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 02:46:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > > So yesterday I tried d-i snapshot 20041005. I won't file an > > installation report because it was all smooth as silk, except for > > one problem... which may be related to my misunderstanding of the > > matter.

Re: Localization-config and conffiles (was Re: Localization-config uploaded, 2 strings for translation)

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 08:24:09AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I believe you have misread the policy. As far as I know, it says that > one packages maintainer scripts should not modify another packages > configuration files. I based the comment on a mail from Konstantinos I recently re

localization-config: Manpage improvements (usage, options, internal working and additional resources)

Package: localization-config Version: 0.104 Priority: wishlist Tags: patch As Konstantinos requested a few months back, here is a patch for the current 'update-locale-config' manpage in localization-config. I've introduce some information based on a review of the source code, but, then again, my e

Bug#245393: about your Debian installation report

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) writes: > If you're unable to do this test for whatever reason, please send a mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let us know, and we will try to look at your report > in more detail. Unfortunately I havn't got an comparable machine available at the moment. So I'm not ab

Bug#277479: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports (B (BDebian-installer-version: Not long ago, (Bhttp://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ (Buname -a: Sorry, did not do (BDate: Not long ago (BMethod: From net-inst cd image, I used the default values (BI think. Not proxied (B (BMachine: AlphaServer DS20E 

Bug#277481: Installation report

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux implementation 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-10-13 22:44 Method: Burnt a netinstall cdrom, booted on it, got b

Bug#277479: installation-reports

> > (Sarge install) > Well, I think the most important problem is that when I > tryed to intall the OS in Japanese (which is the language > I need to install it in) it came out in "Mojibake" or > (unreadable characters) so I was unable to procede with > the installation in Japanese but still trye

Bug#277479: installation-reports

At Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:09:26 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > (Sarge install) > > Well, I think the most important problem is that when I > > tryed to intall the OS in Japanese (which is the language > > I need to install it in) it came out in "Mojibake" or > > (unreadable characters) so I was u

Re: lvm on raid

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 20 October 2004 09:02, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Hey, can the installer handle setting up a degraded RAID array (i.e. a > RAID-1 mirror with the second disk missing) yet? mdadm can certainly > handle the concept. Not ATM. There are 2 open w

Re: lvm on raid

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 20 October 2004 09:02, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > Hey, can the installer handle setting up a degraded RAID array (i.e. a > > RAID-1 mirror with the second disk missing) yet?

Re: lvm on raid

Quoting Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > That's a shame. I would have thought it'd be relatively easy to implement, > but I haven't given the innards of what's involved close inspection... Well, the non easiest thing is maybe getting someone volunteering for implementing this..:-) -- To U

Bug#277479: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:23:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#277479: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#277486: Sarge installer does not boot on a MVME2434 (PowerPC PReP architecture)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 04-08-2004. I got it from ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-powerpc/rc1/images/powerpc/netboot uname -a: NOT available Date: 13-02-2004 Method: Netboot using TFTP and an

Bug#275222: Successful installation

On Wednesday 06 October 2004 21:08, Hans van Zijst wrote: > Couldn't find a way to make installer create RAID arrays and use one of > them for LVM, so I did it myself. When I got to the point where I had > to partition the disks, I fired up a terminal, created the RAID arrays, > ran pvcreate, vgcre

Bug#277491: installation report

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: pre-rc2 for i386 from www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer uname -a: Linux sagittarius 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Oct 7 02:21:16 EDT 2004 i586 GNU/Linux Date: 18 oct, apprx. 10.00-12.00 UTC Method: Netinst cd, from ftp.nl.debian.org with apt-proxy

Bug#239289: Install Problems

Hi,   I was going through the bug list for the installer and came across this bug myself.  You asked the person having the problem to try a newer version of the installer.  I personally have tried up to 10/18/04 version of the installer with the same results.  I have a Dell Latitude C600 wit

Bug#277493: lowmem: Incorrectly sets country

Package: lowmem Severity: normal Tags: patch lowmem sets countrychooser/country instead of setting countrychooser/shortlist. The consequence is "Andorra" as the default country when countrychooser later runs. This is more annoying than critical... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT

Bug#277177: installer hangs in "detecting filesystems"

This morning after leaving the system off I booted and one disk is gone. I don't think it is the disk but the mobo or something. I don't think this problem is the installer's, but of course I don't know the installer ;-) hdb is now unavailable to me. I am running on hda8 with 2.6.7. It cannot

Bug#248855: Fw: Bug#248855: about your Debian installation report

Problems, problems, problems... As Joey requested, I used a CD from: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/pre-rc2/sarge-sparc-businesscard.iso = Option chosen at boot: linux Linux kernel: 2.4.27 1) initial installer screen + no strange black

Bug#277512: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: < Oct.18, 2004. http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso> uname -a: <2.4.27-1-386 (now installed kernel 2.6.8-1-k7)> Date: Method: Machine: Processor: Athlon XP 1600+ Memory: 128MB PC266 Root

Bug#276780: Fwd: Re: Bug#276780: Installation report

On Sunday 17 October 2004 06:16, Ahmad Khayyat wrote: > 1. Kernel 2.4 boots nicely without additional options (only vga=771). > 2. Other 3 kernels boot nicely with the additional option (acpi=off). > 3. Without acpi=off option, 2.6 kernels boot but keyboard is not > working (ssh connects fine and s

Bug#277512: marked as done (installation-reports)

Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:28:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#277512: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Make an investment into your future with judgment recovery services/training

Very large profit handling Money Judgments. Work from your house anywhere in the world. You can be the Boss. Control when you want to work. Lots of our associates earn 5,000US to 12,000US per mo. Excellent training and support. http://www.cooldailyitemnews.com/3/ More information or to sto

Processed: Merge reports about sources.list preseeding on netinsts

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package base-config Ignoring bugs not assigned to: base-config > severity 252121 normal Bug#252121: Should pre-seed Base-config templates with mirror location and mirror settings Severity set to `normal'. > merge 252121 220269 Bug#220269: base-config

Bug#277524: Incorrect keyboard in X

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040930 ( rc2 from web ) uname -a: Linux slave13 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-oct-19 Method: boot CD (Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official Snapshot i386 Binary-1 (20040930)) (d-i pre-rc2 neti

Bug#277177: FWD: Re: Bug#277177: installer hangs in "detecting filesystems"

- Forwarded message from Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:49:28 -0500 To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#277177: installer hangs in "detecting filesystems" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686;

Processed: reopening 277479

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reopen 277479 Bug#277479: installation-reports Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Processed: reassign 277481 to base-config ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 277481 base-config Bug#277481: Installation report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'. > retitle 277481 should be a way to set http proxy if

Processed: severity of 276741 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > severity 276741 serious Bug#276741: does not use correct file system for boot partition Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#277481: Installation report

Samuel Thibault wrote: > I had to resize pre-installed windows' ntfs partition, and hopefully the > pre-rc2 is advertised as having "online ntfs resizer". But it isn't > advertised in the installation process. The partitionning tool just > tells that there is no room for creating linux partitions.

Bug#276741: tag 276741 patch

Matt Kraai wrote: > partman-auto checks the file system specified by the recipe against a > list of valid file systems. Since hfs isn't on the list, it falls > back to ext2. Actually, it does this twice, using slightly different > lists. Teehee. > > The attached patch adds hfs to both lists. >

No sound in GNOME !!!

Installed sarge from with the debian.installer pre-rc2 netinst CD. Used the official weekly binary snapshot from 20040925 for the rest. I selected Slovene keyboard, "GNOME destop" package and mostly accepted the default settings. I log into the destop ( X11 / GNOME ) and ... No sound ! No devic

Bug#277479: installation-reports

padow usmar wrote: > procede because it sayed something like (No partitionable > devices found) so I guess it did not recognize my HHDs. I > have 2 SCA HDDs on that machine. By the way, I was > successfull in installing Debian 3.0_r2 (Woody) although I > was not successfull in implementing Japanese

Processed: reassign 277486 to kernel

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 277486 kernel Bug#277486: Sarge installer does not boot on a MVME2434 (PowerPC PReP architecture) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'. > End of mes

Bug#260553: about your Debian installation report

Florian Siegesmund wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed 2004-10-13, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you can, please go to and > > download the latest release of the installer. Try another install and see > > if the problem you reported is still pres

Bug#277356: base-config: apt-setup loops in the mirror_dir function

Christian Perrier wrote: > When coming at apt-setup, it cycles with "Unable to fetch" > screens. At the time this happens, I'm out of network connection, so > this is not surprising, but there is no way to get out of this loop. I assumed this is where it was cycling, but I do not understand wh

Bug#277524: Incorrect keyboard in X

20.10.2004 Ð 18:55 +0200 xerces8 ÑÐÐ: > Package: installation-reports > > Debian-installer-version: 20040930 ( rc2 from web ) rc2 is not released AFAIK. > > Comments/Problems: > > After install and setup, the keymap in X11 is US ( or similar ), not > slovene as I selected during installation

udebs that need upload (non-i386)

The following udebs that cannot be build on i386 need to be uploaded soon if they're to make the release: partitioner (Code change is required for mips, tested by ths. m68k mips or s390) silo-installer (Many updated translations. Code changes that may need testing.) partman-palo (Many code changes

Bug#277491: installation report

David Fokkema wrote: > I'm sorry I had to put an 'E' at initial boot. There was not a major > problem, but since we want to promote Debian: the isolinux graphical > boot screen was severely scrambled to the point that the clueless won't > know what to do. Of course, he'll try the enter key, but he

Processed: Re: Bug#277524: Incorrect keyboard in X

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 277524 localization-config Bug#277524: Incorrect keyboard in X Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `localization-config'. > retitle 277524 Please configure the X keyboard for Slovenian layout when choosing > sl_SL as locale

Re: udebs that need upload (non-i386)

Joey Hess wrote: > The following udebs that cannot be build on i386 need to be uploaded > soon if they're to make the release: > > partitioner (Code change is required for mips, tested by ths. m68k mips or s390) > silo-installer (Many updated translations. Code changes that may need testing.) > pa

Bug#277524: Incorrect keyboard in X

reassign 277524 localization-config retitle 277524 Please configure the X keyboard for Slovenian layout when choosing sl_SL as locale thanks > After install and setup, the keymap in X11 is US ( or similar ), not > slovene as I selected during installation ( it is correctly slovene > in the /dev/t

Bug#277493: marked as done (lowmem: Incorrectly sets country)

Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:02:30 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#277493: fixed in lowmem 1.06 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Processing of lowmem_1.06_i386.changes

lowmem_1.06_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lowmem_1.06.dsc lowmem_1.06.tar.gz lowmem_1.06_all.udeb lowmemcheck_1.06_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

lowmem override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): lowmemcheck_1.06_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the p

lowmem_1.06_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lowmem_1.06.dsc to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.06.dsc lowmem_1.06.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.06.tar.gz lowmem_1.06_all.udeb to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.06_all.udeb lowmemcheck_1.06_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_1.06_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE

Processing of partman_60_i386.changes

partman_60_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman_60.dsc partman_60.tar.gz partman_60_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Processing of partman-basicfilesystems_36_i386.changes

partman-basicfilesystems_36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-basicfilesystems_36.dsc partman-basicfilesystems_36.tar.gz partman-basicfilesystems_36_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Processing of partman-ext3_34_i386.changes

partman-ext3_34_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-ext3_34.dsc partman-ext3_34.tar.gz partman-ext3_34_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

partman-basicfilesystems_36_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-basicfilesystems_36.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_36.dsc partman-basicfilesystems_36.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_36.tar.gz partman-basicfilesystems_36_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-basicfil

partman_60_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman_60.dsc to pool/main/p/partman/partman_60.dsc partman_60.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman/partman_60.tar.gz partman_60_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman/partman_60_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Processing of network-console_0.0.7_i386.changes

network-console_0.0.7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: network-console_0.0.7.dsc network-console_0.0.7.tar.gz network-console-config_0.0.7_all.deb network-console_0.0.7_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#277365: (Mostly) successful installation report

On Tuesday 19 October 2004 21:25, Joey Hess wrote: > Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > > :02:0d.0 Network controller: Intel Corp. PRO/Wireless 2200BG (rev 05) > > :02:0d.0 0280: 8086:4220 (rev 05) ... > > Apart from the lack of WLAN however, network configuration worked fully > > automatically and

Processing of partman-reiserfs_23_i386.changes

partman-reiserfs_23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-reiserfs_23.dsc partman-reiserfs_23.tar.gz partman-reiserfs_23_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Processing of partman-jfs_11_i386.changes

partman-jfs_11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-jfs_11.dsc partman-jfs_11.tar.gz partman-jfs_11_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

partman-ext3_34_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-ext3_34.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_34.dsc partman-ext3_34.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_34.tar.gz partman-ext3_34_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_34_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribut

network-console_0.0.7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: network-console-config_0.0.7_all.deb to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console-config_0.0.7_all.deb network-console_0.0.7.dsc to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_0.0.7.dsc network-console_0.0.7.tar.gz to pool/main/n/network-console/network-console_0.0.7.tar.gz netwo

Processing of partman-target_32_i386.changes

partman-target_32_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-target_32.dsc partman-target_32.tar.gz partman-target_32_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Processing of partman-xfs_23_i386.changes

partman-xfs_23_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-xfs_23.dsc partman-xfs_23.tar.gz partman-xfs_23_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Processing of partman-basicmethods_25_i386.changes

partman-basicmethods_25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-basicmethods_25.dsc partman-basicmethods_25.tar.gz partman-basicmethods_25_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Processing of partman-efi_7_ia64.changes

partman-efi_7_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-efi_7.dsc partman-efi_7.tar.gz partman-efi_7_ia64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Content of CDs / DVDs

Hello. Since sarge (and everything later) will contain at least 14 CDs I would like to ask simple question: Is there *any* way to check what packages are available on particular CD without downloading iso and mounting it locally? If not (and I'm assuming that's the right answer) then what about

Bug#277479: installation-reports

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:32:13PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > At Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:09:26 +0200, > Christian Perrier wrote: > > > (Sarge install) > > > Well, I think the most important problem is that when I > > > tryed to intall the OS in Japanese (which is the language > > > I need to install i

Re: Content of CDs / DVDs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 20 October 2004 21:48, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Is there *any* way to check what packages are available on particular > CD without downloading iso and mounting it locally? > > If not (and I'm assuming that's the right answer) then

partman-target_32_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-target_32.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_32.dsc partman-target_32.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_32.tar.gz partman-target_32_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_32_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you

partman-efi_7_ia64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-efi_7.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_7.dsc partman-efi_7.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_7.tar.gz partman-efi_7_ia64.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_7_ia64.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian

partman-basicmethods_25_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-basicmethods_25.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_25.dsc partman-basicmethods_25.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_25.tar.gz partman-basicmethods_25_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_25

partman-jfs_11_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-jfs_11.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_11.dsc partman-jfs_11.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_11.tar.gz partman-jfs_11_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_11_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to De

partman-reiserfs_23_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-reiserfs_23.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_23.dsc partman-reiserfs_23.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_23.tar.gz partman-reiserfs_23_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_23_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTE

partman-xfs_23_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-xfs_23.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_23.dsc partman-xfs_23.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_23.tar.gz partman-xfs_23_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_23_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to De

Processing of os-prober_1.01_i386.changes

os-prober_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: os-prober_1.01.dsc os-prober_1.01.tar.gz os-prober_1.01_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Bug#275882: marked as done (os-prober: [patch]windows NT/2000/XP refinement)

Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:17:27 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#275882: fixed in os-prober 1.01 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

os-prober_1.01_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: os-prober_1.01.dsc to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.01.dsc os-prober_1.01.tar.gz to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.01.tar.gz os-prober_1.01_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_1.01_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 275882 Thank you for your

Re: Content of CDs / DVDs

Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there *any* way to check what packages are available on particular CD > without downloading iso and mounting it locally? > > If not (and I'm assuming that's the right answer) then what about adding > some txt files alongside isos? I think

Re: PowerPC Clone fails booting 2.6 d-i floppy

On Oct 19, 2004, at 9:40 AM, Duane Cottle wrote: So far, I've found a few possible options if I want to pass kernel args w/ boot floppies on this box: 1) Make my own miboot image - maybe a bit off track as I'm trying to test _these_ floppies; however, if I got that to work, my success might help th

Re: Content of CDs / DVDs

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 03:27:26PM -0500, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > > Is there *any* way to check what packages are available on particular CD > > without downloading iso and mounting it locally? > > > > If not (and I'm assuming that's the right answer) then what about adding > > some txt files alon

Bug#249993: sorry, that i haven't any time left these days!

hello, i'm sorry, that i can't test "my" problem at the moment. i started a new job and am too much busy getting into the new area. greetings from salzburg hans horwath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Content of CDs / DVDs

Patrzę w ekran, a to Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo pisze do mnie: > Of course this won't be created online, but such images could be put > on web after some time and could be identified with some session id. > (in addition user would be forced to confirm such creation by > email/whatever to not overloa

Re: Content of CDs / DVDs

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:56:43PM +0200, Maciej Dems wrote: > > Of course this won't be created online, but such images could be put > > on web after some time and could be identified with some session id. > > (in addition user would be forced to confirm such creation by > > email/whatever to not

Bug#277592: pre-rc2 i386: bottom portion of screen not viewable

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: pre-rc2 sarge-i386-netinst.iso Method: boot from CD, entering 'linux26' Machine: Mitac 8050D - widescreen centrino laptop Comments/Problems: Everything works as it should (though the background is red, as others have repo

Bug#276741: tag 276741 patch

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:22:41PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Matt Kraai wrote: > > partman-auto checks the file system specified by the recipe against a > > list of valid file systems. Since hfs isn't on the list, it falls > > back to ext2. Actually, it does this twice, using slightly different >

Re: No sound in GNOME !!!

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:14:38PM +0200, xerces8 wrote: > Installed sarge from with the debian.installer pre-rc2 netinst CD. > Used the official weekly binary snapshot from 20040925 for the rest. > > I selected Slovene keyboard, "GNOME destop" package and mostly > accepted the default settings. >

Processing of partman-auto_37_i386.changes

partman-auto_37_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-auto_37.dsc partman-auto_37.tar.gz partman-auto_37_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

partman-auto_37_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-auto_37.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_37.dsc partman-auto_37.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_37.tar.gz partman-auto_37_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_37_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 276741 Thank

Bug#276741: marked as done (does not use correct file system for boot partition)

Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:02:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#276741: fixed in partman-auto 37 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Re: lvm on raid

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:30:38PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > That's a shame. I would have thought it'd be relatively easy to implement, > > but I haven't given the innards of what's involved close inspection... > > Well, the non easiest th

Processing of discover1_1.7.3_i386.changes

discover1_1.7.3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: discover1_1.7.3.dsc discover1_1.7.3.tar.gz discover1_1.7.3_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.7.3_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.7.3_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.7.3_i386.deb discover1-udeb_1.7.3_i386.udeb Greetin

Bug#276474: marked as done (Should Depend on discover1-data)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#276474: fixed in discover1 1.7.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#276475: marked as done (Doesn't ignore .dpkg* files in /etc/discover.d/)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#276475: fixed in discover1 1.7.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#276722: marked as done (discover1: "set -e" prevents cdrom mountpoint creation)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:02:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#276722: fixed in discover1 1.7.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

discover1_1.7.3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: discover1-udeb_1.7.3_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.7.3_i386.udeb discover1_1.7.3.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.3.dsc discover1_1.7.3.tar.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.7.3.tar.gz discover1_1.7.3_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discove

Bug#277356: base-config: apt-setup loops in the mirror_dir function

> > I keep this system snapshot in VmWare so that further investigation is > > possible on 2nd console. > > Would it be possible for you to boot passing DEBCONF_DEBUG=. and get me > a debconf debug log of the apt-setup loop? I did, but where does the log end up? I have a lot of output on the scr

Bug#277592: pre-rc2 i386: bottom portion of screen not viewable

> Comments/Problems: > Everything works as it should (though the background is red, > as others have reported) but the bottom of the screen is not viewable. > This is due to the installer filling the entire width of my display, > while still keeping the default aspect ratio. > This is a problem b

Bug#277592: (forw) Re: Bug#277592: pre-rc2 i386: bottom portion of screen not viewable

- Forwarded message from Marc Juul Christoffersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:18:46 +0200 From: Marc Juul Christoffersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Marc Juul Christoffersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#277592: pre-rc2

Bug#277356: base-config: apt-setup loops in the mirror_dir function

Christian Perrier wrote: > > > I keep this system snapshot in VmWare so that further investigation is > > > possible on 2nd console. > > > > Would it be possible for you to boot passing DEBCONF_DEBUG=. and get me > > a debconf debug log of the apt-setup loop? > > > I did, but where does the log