Am Mon, den 27.10.2003 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen um 23:44:
> Please clean up the conflict you commited, and make it a habit to use
> 'cvs diff -u' before you commit:
Done, sorry about that
gaudenz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 06:56:03PM +0100, Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> >Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
> >
> >>I suspect base-config to automatically answer yes to the "Do you want to
> >>delete any previously downloaded package files?" It probably happened
> >>when during a debian installai
Andrew Pollock wrote:
base-config runs apt-get autoclean.
Well, thanks for making that clear. I'd like to have the option
to skip that. I had packages from releases other than that
defined in the current sources.list and would have liked to keep
them.
It's a bit late now, but it's probably a goo
Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
A suggested solution is a caching http proxy but that would disable
smart cache purging with apt-get autoclean. However, apt-get autoclean
is somewhat limited, as apt-get update runs out of memory with too much
data (e.g. stable+testing+unstable), but that bug will hopeful
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 06:28:51AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > network/linux- (amiga, atari, ...)
> > > network/initrd-.gz
> > > hd-media/linux-
> > > hd-media/initrd-.gz
> > For hd-media, the bootfloppy currently looks for a file named initrd.gz
> > on the disk, so it would be
Hello,
AFAIK, modconf does not yet work with 2.6 kernels (with .ko suffix for
kernel module filename) well, so i've attempted to patch it.
The lame results of that attempt *should* be attached to this mail
(buggy evolution doesn't show me attachments i'm sending) :).
Generally, i've simply greppe
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 06:28:51AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > network/linux- (amiga, atari, ...)
> > > > network/initrd-.gz
> > > > hd-media/linux-
> > > > hd-media/initrd-.gz
>
> > > For hd-media, the bootfloppy currently looks f
Bernhard Kuemel wrote:
> Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >>>base-config runs apt-get autoclean.
> >>
> >>Well, thanks for making that clear. I'd like to have the option
> >>to skip that. I had packages from releases other than that
> >>defined in the current sources.list and would have liked to keep
> >
Accepted:
anna_0.040.dsc
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.040.dsc
anna_0.040.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.040.tar.gz
anna_0.040_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_0.040_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_0.33.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.33.dsc
cdrom-detect_0.33.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.33.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_0.33_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.33_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for yo
Accepted:
cdrom-checker_0.13.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.13.dsc
cdrom-checker_0.13.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.13.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_0.13_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.13_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank
Accepted:
partconf-find-partitions_0.11_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_0.11_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_0.11_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_0.11_i386.udeb
partconf_0.11.dsc
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_0.11.dsc
partconf_0.11.tar.gz
to pool
Am Sam, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 11:29:
> Package: autopartkit
> Version: 0.62
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
> Ok, i am trying to make debian-installer work on the pegasos, and to my
> surprise, yesterday, autopartkit without really giving me the cho
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:32:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#199918: fixed in partconf 0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:32:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214232: fixed in partconf 0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:32:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#214232: fixed in partconf 0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 06:55:35PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Sam, den 25.10.2003 schrieb Sven Luther um 11:29:
> > Package: autopartkit
> > Version: 0.62
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: causes serious data loss
> >
> > Ok, i am trying to make debian-installer work on the pegaso
During the recent months, I have been mostly involved in the work of
translation debconf templates to french.
During this work, I very often found templates which seemd to be
inconsistent with some unwritten (or written, but in several documents
or mailing lists messages) rules.
This often lead m
Package: base-installer
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #214384
This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for base-installer
package.
regards
Jure Cuhalev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# translation of sl.po to Slovenian
# Slovenian messages for debian-installer.
# Copyright (C) 2003 Softwar
Package: cdrom-detect
Severity: wishlist
This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for cdrom-detect package.
regards
Jure Cuhalev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# translation of sl.po to Slovenian
# Slovenian messages for debian-installer.
# Copyright (C) 2003 Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
Package: ddetect
Severity: wishlist
This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for ddetect.
regards
Jure Cuhalev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# translation of sl.po to Slovenian
# Slovenian messages for debian-installer.
# Copyright (C) 2003 Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
# This file is di
Package: grub-installer
Severity: wishlist
This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for grub-installer.
regards
Jure Cuhalev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# translation of sl.po to Slovenian
# Slovenian messages for debian-installer.
# Copyright (C) 2003 Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
# T
Package: lvmcfg
Severity: wishlist
This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for lvmcfg
regards
Jure Cuhalev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# translation of sl.po to Slovenian
# Slovenian messages for debian-installer.
# Copyright (C) 2003 Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
# This file is distr
Package: lilo-installer
Severity: wishlist
This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for lilo-installer
regards
Jure Cuhalev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# translation of sl.po to Slovenian
# Slovenian messages for debian-installer.
# Copyright (C) 2003 Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
# Th
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:15, Jure Cuhalev wrote:
> Package: lilo-installer
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> This is new/fixed slovenian translation of po-file for lilo-installer
>
> regards
>
> Jure Cuhalev
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Committed Slovenian translations to CVS.
Thanks for your contribution
Scripsit Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[much good stuff snipped]
> Templates text should not make reference to widgets belonging to some
> debconf interfaces. Sentences like "I you answer Yes..." have no
> meaning for users of graphical interfaces which use checkboxes for
> boolean questi
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
> Since I didn't hear anything from progeny I have made discover2 packages
> for testing. You can download them at
> http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/d-i/discover2/
Good work. Sorry it took so long before I found time to test it.
Here is the initial test report:
When I try
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> There used to be, somewhere, a guideline that told maintainers to let
> themselves be inspired by the descriptions in the kernel source's
> "make fooconfig", especially with regard to telling the user what the
> conservative defaul
Am Mit, den 29.10.2003 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen um 00:05:
> [Gaudenz Steinlin]
> > Since I didn't hear anything from progeny I have made discover2 packages
> > for testing. You can download them at
> > http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/d-i/discover2/
>
> Good work. Sorry it took so long befor
A few days ago I realized that you could not make a boot disk with a debian
kernel because of the large initrd. Well I have a solution to that if you use
grub. Basically it makes grub floppy with a menu that will be installed on to a
disk. Using update-grub or something to generate the main menu
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:38:46PM -0500, Dan Weber wrote:
> A few days ago I realized that you could not make a boot disk with a debian
> kernel because of the large initrd. Well I have a solution to that if you use
> grub. Basically it makes grub floppy with a menu that will be installed on to
Scripsit Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> especially with regard to telling the user what the conservative
>> default choice is. Many of the kernel option descriptions do indeed
>> say "If unsure, answer No" or the like. Or do
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Am Fre, den 24.10.2003 schrieb Chris Tillman um 08:15:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:14:29PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >
> > Aha! I got a working kernel. I guess I know more than I think I do :)
> >
> > Here is the diff for
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:18:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 06:55:35PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I still think that the real problem is in the modularity of
> debian-installer. It is all nice to have a bunch of modules be used and
> have each provide a menu entry,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:52:27AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> That would be a horrible sentence to put into a debconf
> description.
Of course it would, and I would never recommend doing so.
> > The default choice should always be what the user wants if they are
> > unsure.
>
> I'm afraid
Dan Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A few days ago I realized that you could not make a boot disk with a
> debian kernel because of the large initrd. Well I have a solution
> to that if you use grub. Basically it makes grub floppy with a menu
> that will be installed on to a disk. Using upd
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28 05:27]:
| modules
and we cannot put all modules into one initrd?
How many different modules threre are? I think for the view of
maintainance, it would be easier to create, provide and support only one
initrd for all sub-archs.
For i386, there
37 matches
Mail list logo
