|| On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:11:33 +0200
|| Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pr> [Free Ekanayaka]
>> what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the
>> finish item of base-config?
pr> The version of xdebconfigurator in unstable already have a base-config
pr> menu entr
|| On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 14:44:14 +0200
|| Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OS> I not sure if this can be included on sarge. We will need to have new
OS> templates and translators will need to deal with it but if it is not
OS> problem we can do it. (joeyh, what you think?)
fe> Uhm, the wa
|--==> Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
PR> [Free Ekanayaka]
>>what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the
>>finish item of base-config?
PR> The version of xdebconfigurator in unstable already have a base-config
PR> menu entry, and I believe it is working as it should.
[Free Ekanayaka]
> what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the
> finish item of base-config?
The version of xdebconfigurator in unstable already have a base-config
menu entry, and I believe it is working as it should. Not sure what
more you need. If xdebconfigurator is inst
|--==> Otavio Salvador writes:
OS> || On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:10:58 +0200
OS> || Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fe> Hi,
fe> what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the
fe> finish item of base-config?
OS> I don't think finish be the right place fo
|| On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:57:49 +0200
|| Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mb> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:10:58PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>> so that it won't affect the current behaviour of base-config at all,
>> but at the sametime it would be available for who needs it
|| On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:10:58 +0200
|| Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fe> Hi,
fe> what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the
fe> finish item of base-config?
I don't think finish be the right place for it. I think we should
create another menu item, hiden
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:10:58PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> so that it won't affect the current behaviour of base-config at all,
> but at the sametime it would be available for who needs it
> (e.g. CDDs).
Why wouldn't this be useful for the standard Debian desktop task as
well?
Hi,
what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the
finish item of base-config?
We can use the code from debian-br-cdd and skolelinux, and trigger it
with an hidden debconf question like:
db_get debian-installer/xdebconfigurator || true
if [ "$RET" = "true]; then
...
9 matches
Mail list logo
