|--==> Otavio Salvador writes: OS> || On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:10:58 +0200 OS> || Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
fe> Hi, fe> what do you think about including xdebconfigurator support to the fe> finish item of base-config? OS> I don't think finish be the right place for it. I think we should OS> create another menu item, hiden by default. Yes that's fine too. fe> We can use the code from debian-br-cdd and skolelinux, and trigger it fe> with an hidden debconf question like: fe> db_get debian-installer/xdebconfigurator || true OS> We could but it on base-config space like: OS> base-config/run_xdebconfigurator Ok right. fe> so that it won't affect the current behaviour of base-config at all, fe> but at the same time it would be available for who needs it fe> (e.g. CDDs). OS> Sure and another good think is the not needed to be a dependencie, OS> only a suggestion of base-config. OS> The really good think is leave on Debian the major of code needed for OS> CDDs. This is really good since we have a common part for all CDDs and OS> make a lot easier for us fix bugs. OS> I not sure if this can be included on sarge. We will need to have new OS> templates and translators will need to deal with it but if it is not OS> problem we can do it. (joeyh, what you think?) Uhm, the way I see it there is no translation needed, as the procedure requires no user interaction. Are you referring to error messages. As this feature would not affect the regular behaviour by any mean, and would be triggered by and hidden debconf question, would it be possible to include it anyway? It would let CDDs play and make tests with it. Cheers, Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
