Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:19:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661620: fixed in debian-installer 20120327
has caused the Debian Bug report #661620,
regarding Recent hd-media initrd lacks ext4 support; d-i cannot find iso on
such fs
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: debian-installer
Version: testing
I just tried to install Debian the hd-media way, with recent initrd.gz and
vmlinuz from /debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/
This initrd lacks ext4 support, and d-i is thus unable to find its installation
media, in my case
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:58:14PM +0200, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> Hi all,
> I continued my research about ext4 support in bootloaders and this is
> the result till now:
> ext4 support
>
> * grub: amd64, i386, powerpc w/ ubuntu patch
> * grub2: amd64, i386,
2009/6/2 Stefano Canepa :
> Looks without ext4 support
>
> * yaboot: powerpc
BTW, while I am at it: yaboot's second stage uses libext2fs to access
ext2/ext3 filesystems, so I guess (since modern e2fsprogs seem to
include ext4 support) it should be okay with ext4. I didn't
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:17:04AM +, Etienne Lorrain wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> May I ask what would it take to have the Gujin bootloader added to
> this list, URL: http://gujin.sourceforge.net. It is a "newer"
> bootloader, but there isn't any Debian package for it,
That would be a first s
Hello,
May I ask what would it take to have the Gujin bootloader added to this list,
URL: http://gujin.sourceforge.net.
It is a "newer" bootloader, but there isn't any Debian package for it,
I have never made a Debian package before. Just fetching the source code and
typing "make" will produ
Hello,
2009/6/2 Stefano Canepa :
[...]
> Looks without ext4 support
>
> * aboot: alpha
> * yaboot: powerpc
> * arcboot: mips
> * silo: sparc
> * delo: mipsel
> * sibyl: mips, mipsel
> * prep: powerpc
> * palo: hppa
What people think we ough
* Stefano Canepa [2009-06-02 18:58]:
> Looks without ext4 support
colo (mipsel) is probably missing from that list.
> * delo: mipsel
delo is not used in d-i anymore (the devices supported by delo are no
longer supported by d-i or the Debian kernel).
--
Martin Michlmay
Hi all,
I continued my research about ext4 support in bootloaders and this is
the result till now:
ext4 support
* grub: amd64, i386, powerpc w/ ubuntu patch
* grub2: amd64, i386, powerpc
* lilo-installer: amd64 i386
Looks without ext4 support
* aboot: alpha
* yaboot
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:29:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Christian Perrier writes:
> > If the ext4 support is a quite long term work, shouldn't it be
> > listed in the wiki
> > (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SqueezeGoals...which is
> > currentl
e/modules/ext3-modules, by analogy with the way I added ext4
> > support to partman-ext3? Although again it perhaps feels a little odd,
> > it would involve the smallest source change, would avoid a pass through
> > NEW for kernel udebs on all architectures when we get round to
>
> as long as not all blockers are fixed, i.e. not yet list it in
>> valid_filesystems (IIRC). That will allow us to upload partman-ext3 if
>> needed without having to worry about confusing users.
>
> If the ext4 support is a quite long term work, shouldn't it be lis
yet list it in
> valid_filesystems (IIRC). That will allow us to upload partman-ext3 if
> needed without having to worry about confusing users.
If the ext4 support is a quite long term work, shouldn't it be listed
in the wiki
(http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SqueezeGoals...which is
cur
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> I realised I'd forgotten about the kernel udebs (we do those
> differently in Ubuntu so it slipped my mind). Should I just add ext4 to
> kernel-wedge/modules/ext3-modules, by analogy with the way I added ext4
> support to partm
kernel udebs (we do those differently
in Ubuntu so it slipped my mind). Should I just add ext4 to
kernel-wedge/modules/ext3-modules, by analogy with the way I added ext4
support to partman-ext3? Although again it perhaps feels a little odd,
it would involve the smallest source change, would avoid a p
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 04:42:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I've attached the necessary d-i patches (against current Ubuntu, but
> I'll do any necessary work to merge into Debian) to this mail.
I actually revised the patches to be against d-i trunk before sending
this mail, but forgot to rewri
Colin Watson writes:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:00:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Colin Watson writes:
>> > parted:
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511224
>> > (fairly basic support but enough to get the job done)
>> <...>
>> > Comments?
>>
>> Parted has the d
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:54:36AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:00:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Parted has the detection code support in master branch. I could take
> > a look and port it to stable. That way we could have it as upstream
> > and avoid diverting f
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:00:41PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > parted:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511224
> > (fairly basic support but enough to get the job done)
> <...>
> > Comments?
>
> Parted has the detection code support in master b
Colin Watson writes:
> parted:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511224
> (fairly basic support but enough to get the job done)
<...>
> Comments?
Parted has the detection code support in master branch. I could take
a look and port it to stable. That way we could have it as u
I've been working on adding ext4 support to d-i for Ubuntu. It's
dependent on the following bugs external to d-i:
e2fsprogs:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511207
(missing mkfs.ext4 symlink in e2fsprogs-udeb)
grub:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
21 matches
Mail list logo
