On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 07:14 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Sure, will be clearer.
>
> Can be improved with:
>
> [...]
>
> (this way, "${descriptions}" will not be added as a "string to
> translate" with the risk of some translators translating the varaiable
> name, which is a very common mist
Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> Template: cdebconf/frontend
> Type: select
> Choices-C: ${choices}
> Choices: ${echoices}
> # :sl6:
> _Description: Interface to use:
> Packages that use debconf for configuration share a common look and
> feel.
> You can select the type of user interf
On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 07:53 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Having thought about it a bit more today, I believe moving the template
> > for cdebconf/frontend/gtk to cdebconf.templates is the right thing to
> > do. Although it would put the text in the "wrong" package, it would be
> > in its dep
It would be nice if it didnt Conflict: with debconf (debconf-2.0) because no one needs such problems
early in install.
Cant it run side-by-side debconf (ie, user can theoretically run either) ? It's easy to make side
by side apps but i know: sometimes not.
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting R
Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 23:01 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > I just marked the templates as translatable and part of the newly
> > introduced "sublevel 6" (that isn't counted in statistics).
>
> Thanks, that's awesome !
It's now in place and, stra
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 23:01 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I just marked the templates as translatable and part of the newly
> introduced "sublevel 6" (that isn't counted in statistics).
Thanks, that's awesome !
> I slightly changed the description of the GTK interface, which I found
> too te
Quoting Régis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> Yes, I saw your email this morning and thought "it's not going to work".
> Happy to let you handle it, that was actually my hope :-). I'm mostly
> interested in knowing whether my approach is sensible or should be reverted.
>
> You can have look at c
Christian PERRIER wrote:
>Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
>
>> Has anyone had time to look into it ? It would be nice to get
>> confirmation whether I should revert to the original debconf
>templates,
>> or go ahead and make the "new" ones translatable.
>
>
>I'd prefer handling this mys
Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> Has anyone had time to look into it ? It would be nice to get
> confirmation whether I should revert to the original debconf templates,
> or go ahead and make the "new" ones translatable.
I'd prefer handling this myself if you don't mind, to coordinate
Hi again,
First 2 races done, I've managed to get some sleep, so I'm back for a
week until I switch to China time...
> > Aren't texts identical to debconf ones? I was thinking so, so I never
> > paid attention to this very strongly.
>
> > At least they should be similar, so we should reuse debco
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 14:56 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Regis Boudin wrote:
> > That's a bit odd, the initial setup and conversion is done in the
> > config
> > script, and I would have expected debconf to have already run it
> > before.
> > Unless I got it wrong with my almost empty postinst.
>
> F
Hi,
Apologies for the delay in replies at the moment. Providing support for
the Australia last weekend, and Malaysia this weekend, so I'm mostly
sleeping on my free time...
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 19:08 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
>
> > An obvious o
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 14:56 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Regis Boudin wrote:
> > That's a bit odd, the initial setup and conversion is done in the
> > config
> > script, and I would have expected debconf to have already run it
> > before.
> > Unless I got it wrong with my almost empty postinst.
>
> F
Regis Boudin wrote:
> That's a bit odd, the initial setup and conversion is done in the
> config
> script, and I would have expected debconf to have already run it
> before.
> Unless I got it wrong with my almost empty postinst.
FWIW, I saw the same thing; debconf was using dialog and cdebconf
def
Regis Boudin wrote:
> >Perhaps it's time to get some wide testing? This could be done by
> >temporarily making debconf default DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF=1
>
> Sounds like an idea. the various scripts will probably need an
> additional
> check for cdbconf's existence, though, since it caused me trouble
Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> An obvious one for you should be the complete absence of i18n for
> cdebconf itself. It would be nice if someone could review what I did
> for
> the frontend selection to make sure it's ok before marking the
> templates
> as translatable.
Aren't texts i
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:40:22 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Regis Boudin wrote:
Hi everyone !
That's it, after a month of testing on my main machine, I uploaded
cdebconf 0.159.
Although some features are still missing, it should actually be
usable.
Well, I've been using it on my main mac
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 08:16:56 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
Hi everyone !
That's it, after a month of testing on my main machine, I uploaded
cdebconf 0.159.
Time for me to switch..:-)
Oh, so I'll start breaking people's machine
Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> Hi everyone !
>
> That's it, after a month of testing on my main machine, I uploaded
> cdebconf 0.159.
Time for me to switch..:-)
First glitch I had : I did setup DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF=1, then I ran
"dpkg-reconfigure samba"
Regis Boudin wrote:
> Hi everyone !
>
> That's it, after a month of testing on my main machine, I uploaded
> cdebconf 0.159.
>
> Although some features are still missing, it should actually be usable.
> Well, I've been using it on my main machine for a month wi
Hi everyone !
That's it, after a month of testing on my main machine, I uploaded
cdebconf 0.159.
Although some features are still missing, it should actually be usable.
Well, I've been using it on my main machine for a month with 2 daily
updates, and a few "dpkg-reconfigure -a&quo
21 matches
Mail list logo
