Regis Boudin wrote: > >Perhaps it's time to get some wide testing? This could be done by > >temporarily making debconf default DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF=1 > > Sounds like an idea. the various scripts will probably need an > additional > check for cdbconf's existence, though, since it caused me trouble
I was assuming we'd make debconf depend on it, although this would technically violate its Priority value. For temporary testing it seems ok. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
