Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #382990
has caused the Debian Bug report #382990,
regarding etch beta 3 on SparcStation 20
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #265442
has caused the Debian Bug report #265442,
regarding Debian Installer RC 1 on SPARCstation IPX
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #415079
has caused the Debian Bug report #415079,
regarding installation-reports: etch-RC2 install hangs on sparcstation 20 while
detecting other hardware
to be marked as done
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #299165
has caused the Debian Bug report #299165,
regarding sparcstation lx installs, partman and silo problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #297656
has caused the Debian Bug report #297656,
regarding sparcstation 5 install failure again (base-config)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #296992
has caused the Debian Bug report #296992,
regarding sparcstation 20 install fails to reboot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #296523
has caused the Debian Bug report #296523,
regarding sparcstation 5 error setting up base-config
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #294492
has caused the Debian Bug report #294492,
regarding sparcstation 5 install failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #286467
has caused the Debian Bug report #286467,
regarding sparcstation lx install 20041218 image -- kernel oops at end
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #271385
has caused the Debian Bug report #271385,
regarding installation report Sarge on Sun SparcStation 20 sparc32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <20100907183953.434aa23b8...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Closing old installation reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #313286,
regarding install: Partitioning fails on SPARCstation 4/5 (sun4m) an
:47 GMT 2007
Machine: Sparcstation 20
Processor: TI Viking, 390Z50
Memory: 320MB
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot: [O]
Detect network card:[O]
Configure network: [O]
Detect CD:
Am Sonntag 10 September 2006 00:35 schrieb Jurij Smakov:
> Did you make any progress on this? It turned out that it was not easy for
> me to prevent automatic spin-up of disks on power-up, so I could not
> reproduce this problem. Please try installing using the latest dailies and
> let me know if t
Hi Hendrik,
Thanks for you report. I don't have much to say about the video card
problem, but I've just tried the beta3 on my SS20 and the disks worked
fine. In my case the disks are spun-up already on power-up, this setting
can be controlled by a jumper on the drive, usually. I will try to ch
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: etch beta 3
Date: 2006-08-14
Machine: SUN SparcStation 20 clone (WS-20L)
Processor: SuperSparc II 70MHz
Memory: 448 MB
Partitions:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
(System has only SBUS)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK
tags 286743 pending
thanks
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Blars Blarson wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Only one penguin
cramfs: wrong magic
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Hi,
This problem has been (hopefully) solved already. Relevant fixes will be
included in the next sparc32 kernel-image up
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 286743 pending
Bug#286743: sparcstation 20 install failure -- sid businesscard 20041221
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
: sparcstation 20
Processor: sun4m / dual hypersparc 125 Mhz?
Memory: 192 MB
Root Device: 4GB scsi
Root Size/partition table:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Type 5 keyboard / cg6 framebuffer
fore sba200 atm card installed (unused)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate
did you install? netboot cd
What did you boot off? netboot cd
Machine: sparcstation LX
Processor: sparc32 / sun4m
Memory: 96 MB
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 3822840210112 3418536 6
; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:06:58 -0800
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:06:57 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sparcstation lx install sid d-i 20041210
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Dis
Package: installation-reports
installing from sid d-i netboot cd 20041210
Hardware:
sparcstation LX (sun4m)
Memory: 96MB
Serial console
Good news: it now finds and mounts the cdrom
Bad news: d-i has errors loading the sunlance module, so no ethernet
durring install. Possible mismatching
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Yuri Pimenov wrote:
It boots normaly, but after "language/region" dialog the installation
stops with message that "CDRom can't be mounted". If I press "Yes",
the dialog appears again and so on. My hardware is ok, I can provide
the full information about the drive (serial number
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 282979 installation-reports
Bug#282979: Sun Sparcstation 20, Installation of Sarge netinst failed. Don't
detect CDROM
Warning: Unknown package 'sarge'
Bug reassigned from package `sarge' to `installation-reports'
Package: Sarge
Version: current
I've taken Sarge netinst iso from here:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/current/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
It boots normaly, but after "language/region" dialog the installation
stops with message that "CDRom can't be mounted". If I press
EDT
Method: Booted business card ISO on an external CD drive, installed
rest from http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ .
Machine: Sun Sparcstation 20
Processor: 2x SM71 SuperSparc
Memory: 192M
Root Device: /dev/sda
Root Size/partition table: just under 1G, first partition
Output of lspci and lspci
I suspect that the kernel used on the sparc d-i images will not work
on sun4c/sun4d systems. The dropping of support for sun4c/sun4d was
discussed years ago, and there just does not seem to be anyone who has
both the ability and willingness to support them.
sun4c includes sparcstation 1 & 2,
On Wednesday 18 August 2004 22:34, Joey Hess wrote:
> It turns out that rc1 of the installer had 2 out of 3 sparc CD images
> broken and corrupt. I don't know which you installed from, but unless it
> was the businesscard image, that probably explains this.
>
> We belive that this is fixed in the c
It turns out that rc1 of the installer had 2 out of 3 sparc CD images
broken and corrupt. I don't know which you installed from, but unless it
was the businesscard image, that probably explains this.
We belive that this is fixed in the current daily builds of the
installer, but we've so far been u
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Release Candidate 1
uname -a: N/A
Date: Mon Aug 16 12:21:55 CEST 2004
Method: Booted from CD
Machine: Sun Sparcstation IPX
Processor: ?
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: SCSI, /dev/sda
Root Size/partition table: N/A
Output of lspci: N/A
Base
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 09:01:11AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Yes, problem is still there on the install I am just now completing
> using the sarge cd1 from the jido created 2004-08-09.
Do you know if if you create the partition table and then exit from
partman and rerun it, the partition table
Fri, 14 May 2004 14:40:07 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i4ELe716027216;
Fri, 14 May 2004 14:40:07 -0700
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 14:40:07 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
Wed, 12 May 2004 01:54:51 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i4C8spIT002186;
Wed, 12 May 2004 01:54:51 -0700
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 01:54:51 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
bject: beta 3 install report sparcstation LX -- success
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 257285 d-i
Bug#257285: bug
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> retitle 257285 fremebuffer needed to be disabled on Sun Sparcstation 5
Bug#257285: bug
Changed
I have a SPARCstation 10 UP with 64MB memory.
I have tried:
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-06-23/sparc32/floppy/
and
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-06-01/sparc32/floppy/
and
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-05-14/sparc32/floppy/
Those images, all come up
Morten Werner Olsen wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:04:55PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > > Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
> > > the following result:
> >
> > I don't see the value of using a daily built image that is a month out
> > of date and indeed pr
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:04:55PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
> > the following result:
>
> I don't see the value of using a daily built image that is a month out
> of date and indeed predates the beta 4 release of the installe
Morten Werner Olsen wrote:
> Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
> the following result:
I don't see the value of using a daily built image that is a month out
of date and indeed predates the beta 4 release of the installer?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Descript
Hello!
Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
the following result:
- booting with just 'linux' from the silo prompt does still fail with
the "unable to mount root fs" error
- booting succedes with 'linux boot=mount,dall rw' from the silo
prompt
- when "Inst
/Linux
Date: 2004-05-14
Method: How did you install? netinstall cd
What did you boot off? cdrom
If network install, from where? debian.oregonstate.edu
Proxied? no
Machine: Sun Sparcstation 20
Processor: 135 Mhz hypersparc
Memory: 192 MB
Root Device: 4GB Scsi
Root Size
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Needed to add "ramdisk_size=3D8192" to command line.
>
>Have you ben able to check if this problem is fixed in the daily builds?
This problem does not happen with the 2004-05-11 daily.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED
Blars Blarson wrote:
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/beta4/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
>
> Needed to add "ramdisk_size=8192" to command line.
Have you ben able to check if this problem is fixed in the daily builds?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:34:01PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > DHCP worked second time.
>
> Quite a few people see this; we're not sure exactly what it is
> (whether it's a race, or if slow machines just take more than 10
> seconds.)
This appears to be a race.
> > partman still won't part
Hello!
Today I tried the daily build netinst iso [1] from 24. Apr 2004 with
the following result:
- booting with just 'linux' from the silo prompt does still fail with
the "unable to mount root fs" error
- booting succedes with 'linux boot=mount,dall rw' from the silo
prompt
- when "Inst
* Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-12 01:54]:
> Same sparcstation LX as previous reports. All problems have been seen
> before.
The other report is #246066.
> DHCP worked second time.
Quite a few people see this; we're not sure exactly what it is
(whether it&
If network install, from where? debian.oregonstate.edu
Proxied? no
Machine: Sun Sparcstation LX
Processor: 50Mhx sun4m
Memory: 96 Mb
Root Device: /dev/sda
Root Size/partition table:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 479094
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 02:25:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've asked James to copy 0.080 to testing for sparc. I don't have a
> beta4 update planned at this time. Can someone give me some text to add
> to the errata.
* 2.4.24 kernels are no longer available for the SPARC architecture,
only 2.
- Forwarded message from Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 09:17:24 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#247743: SPARCstation 5 and 20040505 daily businesscard image
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawle
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> I told Joey earlier that a base-installer with that bug fixed should get
> uploaded for a beta4 update, which I'm not sure is going to happen..
I've asked James to copy 0.080 to testing for sparc. I don't have a
beta4 update planned at this time. Can someone give me some text
[ Again, no mailserver available, could a kind person please bounce this
to the appropriate place in the BTS... Thanks :) ]
On Thu, 06 May 2004 13:08:29 -0600, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> Install base system failed because the installer chose the wrong kernel:
> kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp ins
, sunsite.ualberta.ca, not proxied
testing
Machine: SPARCstation 5
Processor: sparc4m
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: SCSI /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target4/lun0/disc 4.1 GB
Root Size/partition table:
scsi(0,4,0)part1ext34.1GB /
scsi(0,4,0)part2swap181.3MB swap
scsi(0,3,0)part1reiserfs
* Peter Karbaliotis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-06 13:08]:
> kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp instead of kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
> I was not prompted for a kernel to install.
>
> Here is the contents of /proc/cpuinfo
I think you forgot to include /proc/cpuinfo
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL
Joey Hess wrote:
Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
Here is the contents of /proc/cpuinfo
Erm, I hope it's not really empty. Can you try agin to include it?
I'm confused. It's there in my Sent Mail and I can see it on the web in
BTS.
Here it is again
cpu : Fujitsu MB86904
fpu : Lsi Login/Meiko L64804 or
Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> Here is the contents of /proc/cpuinfo
>
>
>
Erm, I hope it's not really empty. Can you try agin to include it?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, sunsite.ualberta.ca, not proxied
testing
Machine: SPARCstation 5
Processor: sparc4m
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: SCSI /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target4/lun0/disc 4.1 GB
Root Size/partition table:
scsi(0,4,0)part1 ext3 4.1GB /
scsi(0,4,0)part2 swap 181.3MB swap
scsi(0,3,0)part1 reiserfs 1.0GB /home
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:34:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#244294: Installation report for Sparcstation 10 (netboot, serial
console)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> [1] One minor problem which I encountered is triggered, when the chosen
> mirror is bad (in my case the mirror I have chosen did not carry sparc
> packages). I was then presented by a screen with an informational
> message and three options: "Retry", "Change mirror
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:23:41PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > [2] A more serious problem occured after reboot. Even though I was installing
> > over a serial console, installer failed to recognize it, it seems. It
> > activated the usual 6 virtual consoles, however failed to activate
> >
netbooting from a PC with rarpd and tftpd.
Machine: Sparcstation 10 (sun4m).
Processor: SuperSPARC TMS390
Memory: 80MB
Root Device: SCSI drive, Seagate ST1480N, 437 MB, /dev/sda
Root Size/partition table: output of fdisk -l /dev/sda:
Disk /dev/sda (Sun disk label): 9 heads, 80 sectors, 1018 cylinders
Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:03:00 -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
WARNING: Your /etc/fstab does not contain the fsck passno field. I will
kludge around things for you, but you should fix your /etc/fstab file as
soon as you can.
And then the boot hangs because the root filesystem
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:10:18PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:03:00 -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> > WARNING: Your /etc/fstab does not contain the fsck passno field. I will
> > kludge around things for you, but you should fix your /etc/fstab file as
> > soon as you can
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:03:00 -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> WARNING: Your /etc/fstab does not contain the fsck passno field. I will
> kludge around things for you, but you should fix your /etc/fstab file as
> soon as you can.
>
> And then the boot hangs because the root filesystem is read-on
SPARCstation 5
Processor: 25MHz(?) sun4m
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: SCSI /dev/hda 1GB
Root Size/partition table:
scsi(0,3,0)part1ext332MB/boot
scsi(0,3,0)part2swap128MB
scsi(0,3,0)part4ext3256MB /root
scsi(0,3,0)part5ext3
Method: Netboot, rarp/tftp from my x86/sid workstation, squid cache
Machine: SparcStation 20
Processor: SuperSparc-II
Memory: 256M
Root Device: 9G SCA SCSI /dev/sda1
Root Size/partition table: 1G /, 512M swap, rest LVM
Output of lspci:
pcilib: Cannot open /proc/bus/pci
lspci: Cannot find any working
On 21.III.2004 at 22:11 Blars Blarson wrote:
>
> I want to install on my second hard drive, which is on the second scsi
> bus. (shows up as host1/bus0/target1) The partitoner writes the new
> lables, but the newly-created unallocated space does not show up so I
> cannot partition the drive.
If y
Your message dated Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:48:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236364: SPARCstation 5 installation report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
? cdrom
If network install, from where? debian.oregonstate.edu
Proxied? no
Machine: Sun Sparcstation LX
Processor: 50Mhx sun4m
Memory: 96 Mb
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table:
Output of lspci:
Serial console
Sbus cards:
FSBE SCSI/ethernet
SunVideo video capture
Base System
This bug report should probably be closed. I will file new installation
reports for newer installer images.
Thanks
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 780-492-7660
Computing and Network Services University of Alberta
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp when
it should have chosen kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
I think t
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
> This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
> Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp when
> it should have chosen kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
I think this is fixed in cvs ve
I went back and set the install to use testing, copied /target/bin/sleep
and /target/lib/librt.so.1 to /bin and /lib, respectively and wiped the
prevous installation.
This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-spar
: sunsite.ualberta.ca, not
proxied
Machine: Sun SPARCstation 5
Processor: 25MHz(?) sun4m
Memory: 64 MB
Root Device: SCSI /dev/hda 1GB
Root Size/partition table:
scsi(0,3,0)part1ext332MB/boot
scsi(0,3,0)part2swap128MB
scsi(0,3,0)part4ext3256MB /root
> One person mentioned that older cd-roms don't always like cd-rw media and
> that might be the source of my error. For reference sake, I think that may
> be a part of it but I also looked at a sun documentation page of sparc
> boot-proms and noticed that you can boot different cd-rom partitions an
#--##--##--##--##--##--##--##--##--##--##
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Henry Schimmer wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> > I have been having some serious issues trying to get a
> > SparcStation 20 to boot. In order to install debian I had to net-boot the
> > machine sinc
Hi Tim,
> I have been having some serious issues trying to get a
> SparcStation 20 to boot. In order to install debian I had to net-boot the
> machine since it did not like the cd-rom for some reason.
Maybe you have to jumper it to use a blocksize of 512 Bytes; some (older) CDR
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Tim Spriggs wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been having some serious issues trying to get a
> SparcStation 20 to boot. In order to install debian I had to net-boot the
> machine since it did not like the cd-rom for some reas
Hello,
I have been having some serious issues trying to get a
SparcStation 20 to boot. In order to install debian I had to net-boot the
machine since it did not like the cd-rom for some reason.
The installation process has had problems at the very end when
"Making the s
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 08:59:43PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > as expected it just doesn't work. I've never seen a floppy install work
>
> What does that mean, it would not work or did you never use floppies on
> them?
Says something like "could not load Sun Package" or something like that.
D
#include
Chris Jantzen wrote on Fri Jun 07, 2002 um 07:02:46PM:
> > > SPARCstation IPC is listed as working in documentation, but will not
> > > boot tftpboot.img. Boot ROM 2.4, 48MB RAM (maximum), onboard ethernet.
> >
> > There is many trouble with tftpboot mode
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 06:43:23PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> severity 148785 important
> thanks
>
> #include
> Chris Jantzen wrote on Sat Jun 01, 2002 um 08:13:09PM:
>
> > SPARCstation IPC is listed as working in documentation, but will not
> > boot tftpbo
severity 148785 important
thanks
#include
Chris Jantzen wrote on Sat Jun 01, 2002 um 08:13:09PM:
> SPARCstation IPC is listed as working in documentation, but will not
> boot tftpboot.img. Boot ROM 2.4, 48MB RAM (maximum), onboard ethernet.
There is many trouble with tftpboot mode.
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 148785 important
Bug#148785: boot-floppies: sparc sun4c SPARCstation IPC won't boot tftpboot.img
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A; reported 2002-06-01
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
SPARCstation IPC is listed as working in documentation, but will not
boot tftpboot.img. Boot ROM 2.4, 48MB RAM (maximum), onboard ethernet.
Returns "Watchdog reset, Instru
n, 27 May 2002 15:31:29 +0200
From: Tom Deprez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Installation on SPARCSTATION 20
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 15:32:15 +0200 (MEST)
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found a way to solve the problem. If I do not use a seperate partition for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 117676 sysvinit
Bug#117676: Woody installation hangs on SparcStation 5/110
Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `sysvinit'.
> severity 116829 serious
Bug#116829: sysvinit postinst's 'init q'
Seve
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 3.0.16
Severity: serious
Installation hangs during install of essential packages. tty4 shows:
Setting up whiptail (0.50.17-7) ...
Setting up sysvinit (2.83-1) ...
Creating /dev/initctl
tty2 allows keyboard input but never offers a shell. This appears to be
the sa
On 21 Mar 2001, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Actually I have two IPXs with
> > 48Mb RAM and 16Mb RAM, ROM Rev 2.4 and ROM Rev. 2.3 respectively.
> >
> > They both act in exactly the same manner when I boot them from my other Sun
> > computer, a SPARCstation IPX using
> "James Ascroft-Leigh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am not sure if this is the correct email address but I am having a problem
> > booting into Debian on my SPARCstation IPX.
> > Actually I have two IPXs with
> > 48Mb RAM and 16Mb
"James Ascroft-Leigh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am not sure if this is the correct email address but I am having a problem
> booting into Debian on my SPARCstation IPX.
I'm cross-posting this to debian-sparc list for comment.
> Actually I have two IPXs wit
I am not sure if this is the correct email address but I am having a problem
booting into Debian on my SPARCstation IPX. Actually I have two IPXs with
48Mb RAM and 16Mb RAM, ROM Rev 2.4 and ROM Rev. 2.3 respectively.
They both act in exactly the same manner when I boot them from my other Sun
Benedikt Spranger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When trying to install the 'Kernel and modules', the kernel is installed
> from network, rescue.bin and the driver-1.bin and driver-2.bin are
> downloaded. After that the installation program jumps back to 'Kernel and
> modules'. Trying to ignore th
ue, 30 Jan 2001 19:50:00 +0100
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:49:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Benedikt Spranger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can not install Debian 2.2r2 on a SPARCStation 10
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.20-2000-12-03
When trying to install the 'Kernel and modules', the kernel is installed
from network, rescue.bin and the driver-1.bin and driver-2.bin are
downloaded. After that the installation program jumps back to 'Kernel and
modules'. Trying to ignore this h
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 01:44:19PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Sun SparcStation 5 and I would like to use Linux on it. Is Debian
> compatible with SparcStation5?
Yes. You would be better off directing sparc specific questions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Use the
Hi,
I have a Sun SparcStation 5 and I would like to use Linux on it. Is Debian
compatible with SparcStation5?
Thanx,
Iulian Ionescu
SysAdm CMB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
95 matches
Mail list logo
