On 2/10/22 3:27 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Do I need to file another bug in addition to #983357 to get this
problem listed on the bullseye (and also RC versions) d-i errata pages?
This is the most establish process, so yes, I suggest you just go an
On 2/10/2022 3:27 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
The problem as I see it is that the debian installer team is already
aware of the problem and has been aware of it for over six months
because #983357 is marked as affecting d-i. So I do not underst
Hi Chuck,
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
The problem as I see it is that the debian
installer team is already aware of the problem and has been aware of it
for over six months because #983357 is marked as affecting d-i. So I do
not understand why #983357 is not included on the d-
On 2/9/2022 3:43 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
Subject: 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes /
installation guide?
For at least the release notes, because nobody asked the editors to
include it.
On 09-02-2022 21:04, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
However, this is a well-known
Hi,
Subject: 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes /
installation guide?
For at least the release notes, because nobody asked the editors to
include it.
On 09-02-2022 21:04, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
However, this is a well-known problem, but neither the Bullseye release
the Linux kernel UEVENT_BUFFER_SIZE, and also fixes the crash in
the d-i.
However, this is a well-known problem, but neither the Bullseye release
notes nor the Bullseye installation guide mentions this known problem
that has not yet been fixed.
I have an account at the xenproject's wiki and I r
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:49:35AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > 'official' and 'inofficial' are IMO the wrong terms here, it would be
> > better to call them what they are: Debian main/free installation
> > images and Debian main&non-free installation images.
> Are you choosing to ignore SC#5
Hi Cyril,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (Wed, 4 Aug 2021 01:49:35 +0200):
> > > When using an official installer image, you will most likely need to
> > > enable the non-free component of the archive, when asked for that.
>
> Do we prompt for such a thing? We offer loading firmware from external
> stora
Hi,
Am 4. August 2021 01:01:15 MESZ schrieb Holger Levsen :
>So, I'd call those images the "Debian main images" and the "Debian main
>images with non-free firmwares".
>
>But maybe besides being too late for this change, this change is also
>not just editorial / a question of language, but a politi
Holger Levsen (2021-08-03):
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:05:34PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > When using an official installer image, you will most likely need to
> > enable the non-free component of the archive, when asked for that.
Do we prompt for such a thing? We offer loading firmware fr
hi,
thanks to all of you making installations with non-free firmwares more
bearable and finally enjoyable!
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:05:34PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> When using an official installer image, you will most likely need to
> enable the non-free component of the archive, when a
A bit of wordsmithing, if I may, from a native Engish (US) speaker...
I did a bit of re-arranging, mostly putting the explanation at the beginning. I
also changed some working to make it flow a bit better.
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 21:11:07 +0200
Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Help with installation of
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Tue, 03 Aug 2021 19:34:51 +0200):
> what about adding a small hint to the release-notes,
> describing a bit the new "firmware-installation"
> mechanism via modalias, maybe with a link to the
> new docs in the installation-guide, for those who
Hi,
what about adding a small hint to the release-notes,
describing a bit the new "firmware-installation"
mechanism via modalias, maybe with a link to the
new docs in the installation-guide, for those who
experience problems?
I would volunteer for working out a proposal, if wanted..
Hi boot team,
As is custom in the final phases of the release, I'm asking you to think
about issues that are worth mentioning in the release notes for bullseye
from the perspective of the installer.
Feel free to reply to this e-mail, or, even better, to bts against the
release-notes packa
[Bcc: debian-boot]
Dear Debian-User subscribers,
The Release Notes editor is asking whether this is still an issue for
bullseye (i.e. if the patch to Debian Installer mentioned below was
applied in the meantime).
It will be a while until I get to check that. If someone can confirm
either way
Control: retitle -1 Installation guide: No instructions for verifying image
integrity after download
Control: tags -1 + patch
xloem <0xl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: 0xl...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I&#
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Installation guide: No instructions for verifying image integrity
> after download
Bug #975331 [installation-guide] release-notes: Installation guide: No
instructions for verifying image integrity after download
Changed Bug title to 'Install
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 installation-guide
Bug #975331 [release-notes] release-notes: Installation guide: No instructions
for verifying image integrity after download
Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes' to 'installation-guide'.
Ignoring request
Control: reassign -1 installation-guide
On Vi, 20 nov 20, 15:18:05, xloem wrote:
> Package: release-notes
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: 0xl...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I'm pursuing installing Debian using the netboot concatenatable SD card images
Hi,
Paul Gevers (2019-07-04):
> This apparently wasn't uploaded, so it's to late for the initial buster
> release. Does it make any sense to mention this in the release notes? I
> tend to say it doesn't, but will do it nevertheless when others think it
> does.
I see
ther entries are also affected.
> I've provided a patch on the referenced salsa URL.
This apparently wasn't uploaded, so it's to late for the initial buster
release. Does it make any sense to mention this in the release notes? I
tend to say it doesn't, but will do it nevert
Hi Ben, Holger,
On 22-04-2019 00:25, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 16:45 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Package: release-notes
>> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
>>
>> As now discussion on the RT sprint, the release notes should probably
>>
Hi all,
Paul Gevers (2019-04-25):
> On 25-04-2019 08:11, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Paul Gevers wrote:
> > First, I wonder why you ask personally me for this.
>
> Because the task was originally self-assigned to kibi and was
> documented on the wiki [1] as "ask Holger".
Right, this is entirely
aller,
> and thus is not properly documented in the installation-guide.
> However, the guide is still release-ready despite this, if you ask me.
Good to know. Thanks.
> When it comes to the release-notes, I mailed a short proposal for this to
> debian-boot weeks ago, but got no answer.
[Adding debian-boot, kibi, steve to the loop]
Hi,
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> We're getting closer and closer to the release of buster. We can't
> properly release without the installation guide and the Debian-installer
> release notes. To see where we stand o
Hi,
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Debian-boot,
>
> Friendly ping.
>
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:44:30 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 04:45:20PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > >As now discussion on the RT sprint, the release notes should probabl
Hi Debian-boot,
Friendly ping.
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 07:44:30 + Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 04:45:20PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >As now discussion on the RT sprint, the release notes should probably
> >say something about the work on secure boot.
> &g
Package: release-notes
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
As now discussion on the RT sprint, the release notes should probably
say something about the work on secure boot.
I wouldn't know what to put in, so proposals are welcome. Until that
time, I file this bug to not forget.
Hi
On 23-03-2019 12:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> This was backed out at the request of the security team:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/974578/accepted-pkgsel-057-source-into-unstable/
>
> so I guess this makes this bug report moot?
So let's close the bug.
Paul
signature.asc
Descrip
attended-upgrades support by default in pkgsel,
> > which is first shipped with the D-I Buster Alpha 2 release (#875858).
> >
> > It would be nice to document this change in the release notes, along with
> > possible configuration changes users might want to perform, if
h the D-I Buster Alpha 2 release (#875858).
>
> It would be nice to document this change in the release notes, along with
> possible configuration changes users might want to perform, if only how to
> opt out in case one doesn't wish to use this feature (I figure removing the
> pa
Hi,
while translating the release-notes into German, I noticed that the content
for the installation system is still for Stretch.
I have prepared a first patch, to get that updated for Buster.
My proposal would be, to go for something like a "minimalistic approach" like
the followi
Reply in-line :-
On 27/01/2019, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi Shirish!
>
Hi Steve!
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:20:03PM +, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>>Dear all,
>>
>>I saw earlier today that the Debian buster freeze has become [1]. I
>>also saw that the alpha 4 release last month [2] and the errata
Hi Shirish!
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:20:03PM +, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I saw earlier today that the Debian buster freeze has become [1]. I
>also saw that the alpha 4 release last month [2] and the errata
>published with it [3] . I would probably share both the free and
>non-free
are dropped from buster and can live in
sid/experimental indefinitely. I am/was also wondering if there are
any working release notes such as the ones released with stretch [8].
The release notes would probably cover hardware architectures which
would be the same as in stretch. The main big thing
So it’s deliberate, I guess.
Is there a current draft of the work-in-progress that I could look at?
Thanks,
Rick
On Jul 24, 2018, at 7:50 PM, Showfom wrote:
> Hello Rick,
>
>>> This is a work-in-progress version of the Release Notes for Debian 10,
>>> codename bust
Hello Rick,
>> This is a work-in-progress version of the Release Notes for Debian 10,
>> codename buster, which isn't released yet
So no information on releasenotes
Buster will be released on 2019 and these pages will be updated then.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:07 AM R
On webpage
https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/releasenotes
There are a bunch of links that are claimed to be for draft release notes for
Buster.
Unfortunately, all of them wind up at “Page not found”.
Is this deliberate? Or is it possibly a result of some recent change of
servers
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
[Please keep debian-boot@ and hert...@debian.org in copy of your answers.]
Hi,
Raphaël Hertzog enabled unattended-upgrades support by default in pkgsel,
which is first shipped with the D-I Buster Alpha 2 release (#875858).
It would be nice to document
Baptiste Jammet:
> Hello,
>
> Dixit Niels Thykier, le 03/04/2017 :
>
>> Please let reply to this thread once the changes have been done, so I
>> can mark them as done in my checklist. :)
> Doing so, see
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/04/msg00336.html
> and
> https://lists.debian.or
Hello,
Dixit Niels Thykier, le 03/04/2017 :
>Please let reply to this thread once the changes have been done, so I
>can mark them as done in my checklist. :)
Doing so, see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/04/msg00336.html
and
https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2017/05/msg00012.html
>
Hello all,
Dixit Baptiste Jammet, le 19/03/2017 :
>I don't know if there will be a d-i Stretch RC 3, but I would like to
>complete the "installing" chapter of the release notes.
Except for the ifname/systemd part (discussion is ongoing on -doc, see
https://lists.debian.o
Holger Wansing:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> After Samuel's commits
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i?view=revision&revision=70661
> and
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i?view=revision&revision=70695
> this issue is now done.
>
>
> Holger
>
>
Thanks for the follow up and thanks to Samuel
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Samuel Thibault:
> > Holger Wansing, on dim. 26 mars 2017 19:16:00 +0200, wrote:
> >> Niels Thykier wrote:
> >>> There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
> >>> input from the d-i team[1]
> >>>
> >>> Items are:
> >>> * Installation Guide sh
Baptiste Jammet:
> Hi,
>
> Dixit Niels Thykier, le 03/04/2017 :
>
>>> * release-notes: d-i team signoff for specials with this update
>>> (check esp. if old versions of d-i should be purged if new versions
>>> enter $suite's d-i area)
>>>
Hi,
Dixit Niels Thykier, le 03/04/2017 :
>> * release-notes: d-i team signoff for specials with this update
>> (check esp. if old versions of d-i should be purged if new versions
>> enter $suite's d-i area)
>>
>
>I haven't heard anything about this ite
ything else missing here
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/01/msg00369.html).
Does this mean that we are good to go once the above is fixed?
> * release-notes: d-i team signoff for specials with this update (check
>esp. if old versions of d-i should be purged if new versions enter
Samuel Thibault:
> Holger Wansing, on dim. 26 mars 2017 19:16:00 +0200, wrote:
>> Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
>>> input from the d-i team[1]
>>>
>>> Items are:
>>> * Installation Guide should be up-to-date
>>
>> There's one thread
Holger Wansing, on dim. 26 mars 2017 19:16:00 +0200, wrote:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
> > There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
> > input from the d-i team[1]
> >
> > Items are:
> > * Installation Guide should be up-to-date
>
> There's one thread coming to my mind:
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
> input from the d-i team[1]
>
> Items are:
> * Installation Guide should be up-to-date
There's one thread coming to my mind:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/01/msg00369.html
H
Hi,
There are two d-i related items in the release checklist that we need
input from the d-i team[1]
Items are:
* Installation Guide should be up-to-date
* release-notes: d-i team signoff for specials with this update (check
esp. if old versions of d-i should be purged if new versions enter
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:45:24PM +0100, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
> Hi Vince,
>
> Dixit Vincent McIntyre, le 20/03/2017 :
>
> >> +ifname instead of mac address
> ...
> >Not having really worked with stretch yet (ie target audience member),
> >I'm had no real idea what this meant when I first read
Hi Vince,
Dixit Vincent McIntyre, le 20/03/2017 :
>> +ifname instead of mac address
...
>Not having really worked with stretch yet (ie target audience member),
>I'm had no real idea what this meant when I first read it.
Found in the Alpha 1 release annoucement:
https://www.debian.org/devel/debia
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
Thanks for raising these important items.
...
> +ifname instead of mac address
> +
> +
> +The installer and the installed systems will now use ifnames by default
> +instead of mac for network interface names.
> +
> +
> +
Not havi
Hello -boot people,
(Cc debian-doc for information)
I don't know if there will be a d-i Stretch RC 3, but I would like to
complete the "installing" chapter of the release notes.
I have already done some easy update [1]:
* ports: mips64el added and none removed
* i586 bumped to i
On 2015-04-20 08:26, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015, 20.17:27 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>> Holger Wansing (2015-04-19):
>>> The release-notes currently contain
>>>
>>> Graphical installer
>>>
>>>
On 2015-04-19 21:23, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I tried to ask in #debian-i18n about the new languages, but so far no
>> one has replied me. I am a bit overbooked, so if any you have time to
>> follow on that, then I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> I have looked i
worked on the release notes for Tajik, (s)he might want to complete
the D-I strings as well.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> I tried to ask in #debian-i18n about the new languages, but so far no
> one has replied me. I am a bit overbooked, so if any you have time to
> follow on that, then I would greatly appreciate it.
I have looked into this. Based on
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/de
Holger Wansing (2015-04-19):
> The release-notes currently contain
>
> Graphical installer
>
> Graphical installer is now the default on supported platforms.
> Text installer is still accessible from the very first menu, or if
> the system has
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-04-11 08:07, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Dixit Niels Thykier, le 16/03/2015 :
> >
> >> I am contacting you to do a final review of the release-notes for the
> >> d-i related topics (as listed on [1
On 2015-04-11 08:07, Baptiste Jammet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Dixit Niels Thykier, le 16/03/2015 :
>
>> I am contacting you to do a final review of the release-notes for the
>> d-i related topics (as listed on [1]):
>
> Here are some items I think it's imp
Hi,
Baptiste Jammet wrote:
>
> New ports
> +
>
>
> -Support for the 'armhf' and 's390x' architectures has been added to the
> installer.
> +Support for the 'arm64' and 'pp64el' architectures has been added to the
> installer.
has to be 'ppc64el'
>
>
>
Holger
--
Hello,
Dixit Niels Thykier, le 16/03/2015 :
>I am contacting you to do a final review of the release-notes for the
>d-i related topics (as listed on [1]):
Here are some items I think it's important to highlight, taken from d-i
release announces.
I tried to clean the page a bit an
perblock time check causes problems for fsck in
initramfs
Removed tag(s) upstream and pending.
> reassign 782178 release-notes
Bug #782178 [clock-setup] Superblock time check causes problems for fsck in
initramfs
Bug reassigned from package 'clock-setup' to 'release-notes'
an
existing clone.
> severity -1 important
Failed to set severity of Bug -1 to important: The 'bug' parameter ("-1") to
Debbugs::Control::set_severity did not pass regex check
> reassign -1 release-notes
Failed to clear fixed versions and reopen on -1: The '
gt; Regards
>
>
> [1]:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/en/installing.dbk?view=log
> [2]:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/en/installing.dbk?revision=10511&view=markup#l223
That's the kind of thi
Hello,
> * Chapter 3: done
The installer section has seen no important changes since wheezy [1]
and still indicate a migration from ext3 to ext4 for example [2].
A full rewrite is needed (cc-ing debian-boot).
Regards
[1]:
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Dear installer team,
I am contacting you to do a final review of the release-notes for the
d-i related topics (as listed on [1]):
"""
Check with d-i team for specials with this update (check esp. if old
versions of d-i should be purged
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:24:23 +0100 Baptiste Jammet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As already said, this was fixed with commits r69410-69412.
>
> >I can close this
> >bug in few days, unless someone do it before or tell me to not do it.
>
> No news, so I'm closing it now.
Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:24:23 +0100
with message-id <20141216182423.7734313d.bapti...@mailoo.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#730441: release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since
at least squeeze
has caused the Debian Bug report #730441,
regarding release-notes: Debian requi
Hi all,
Dixit Samuel Bronson, le 24/11/2013 :
>This would seem to indicate that you now need at least a 586 to run
>Debian.
Similar words were added to the installation-guide by Ben in
commits r69410-69412, so I think we can close this bug now.
Dixit Cyril Brulebois, le 11/03/2014 :
>We could p
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #730441 [installation-guide] release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since
at least squeeze
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
730441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
efaulting to -march=i586 at least since squeeze, or r4557 in the GCC
> >packaging SVN [1].
> >
> >This would seem to indicate that you now need at least a 586 to run
> >Debian.
> >
> >However, section 2.1.2.1 CPU of the release notes still says:
> >
>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 installation-guide
Bug #730441 [release-notes] release-notes: Debian requires an i586 since at
least squeeze
Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes' to 'installation-guide'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #73
Your message dated Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:18:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#699297: fixed in installation-guide 20130208
has caused the Debian Bug report #699297,
regarding release-notes: utc/local timezone no longer in /etc/default/rcS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #699297 [installation-guide] release-notes: utc/local timezone no longer in
/etc/default/rcS
Added tag(s) pending.
--
699297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699297
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hello,
Holger Wansing, le Wed 30 Jan 2013 21:52:55 +0100, a écrit :
> Proposal patch attached.
Applied, thanks!
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #699297 [installation-guide] release-notes: utc/local timezone no longer in
/etc/default/rcS
Added tag(s) patch.
--
699297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699297
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: tags -1 +patch
thanks
Hi,
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> > reassign -1 installation-guide
> Bug #699297 [release-notes] release-notes: utc/local timezone no longer in
> /etc/default/rcS
> Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 installation-guide
Bug #699297 [release-notes] release-notes: utc/local timezone no longer in
/etc/default/rcS
Bug reassigned from package 'release-notes' to 'installation-guide'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 660734 +help
Bug #660734 [base-installer] d-i: radeon: Please make sure firmware is
installed or the user warned about its lack
Bug #661069 [base-installer] d-i: radeon: Please make sure firmware is
installed or the user warned about its la
tags 660734 +help
thanks
A draft text, or a patch would be very much appreciated.
Bye,
Joost
--
The universe is made of stories, not of atoms.
-- Muriel Rukeyser in "The Speed of Darkness", 1968
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 08:23:38PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña (j...@computer.org):
>
> > Wasn't Serbian disabled too? (at least this is what I found in previous
> > announcements from d-i)
>
> Nope. It has been re-enabled (Serbian/cyrillic. We have wo
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña (j...@computer.org):
> Wasn't Serbian disabled too? (at least this is what I found in previous
> announcements from d-i)
Nope. It has been re-enabled (Serbian/cyrillic. We have work for
Serbian/Latin but sr~latin is badly supported as language code)
> Based
A Sábado 23 Outubro 2010 16:23:24 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña você
escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
[...]
> > (I find the last sentence a good way to give Frans some dedication
> > without giving too much emphasis to it, which he would maybe not h
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:40:34PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Here are data for localization:
Thanks Christian for the update.
> D-I now supports 67 languages (including English) with 5 really new
(...)
> - Wolof and Welsh disabled (too incomplete translations).
Wasn't Serbian disabled to
2010/10/16 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña :
> I have used this information to prepare the text for the Release Notes.
> It should be available in the next few hours in
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-installing.en.html
I'm sorry, it looks like there
Quoting Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (j...@debian.org):
> Browsing the Debian Installer Goals for Squeeze in the wiki [2] I can
> get a feeling of some of the most relevant changes, but it would help
> if the specific goals that have been met and change the user
> experience (from previous d-i versio
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:
> #598978 - btrfs requires crc32c.ko
>
> I'm not sure about this, but would it be something like adding crc32 (or
> crc32c) to kernel-wedge/modules/btrfs-modules?
In crc-modules. I did it but forgot to upload kernel-wedge. Just don
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
...
> The last problem that I knew about was fix in current dailies since it
> lacked a required kernel module.
...
There's a BR for that:
#598978 - btrfs requires crc32c.ko
I'm not sure about this, but would it
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
> I don't see btrfs support mentioned, but all the bits I know of seem to
> be in place. Has that been tested to work?
The last problem that I knew about was fix in current dailies since it
lacked a required kernel module.
--
Otavio Salv
I don't see btrfs support mentioned, but all the bits I know of seem to
be in place. Has that been tested to work?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, le Sat 16 Oct 2010 01:38:28 +0200, a écrit :
> Question on the architectures: does d-i still have support for hppa? will it
> have support for kfreeBSD before the release? (from
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata I'm inclined to say 'no')
That's o
eleases contains most of the information
> you're looking for:
(...)
I have used this information to prepare the text for the Release Notes.
It should be available in the next few hours in
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-installing.en.html
Please review
* Martin Michlmayr [2010-10-15 15:02]:
> alpha got dropped as a release architecture for arm.
For squeeze. :)
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
* Javier Fernandez-Sanguino [2010-10-15 09:40]:
> Browsing the Debian Installer Goals for Squeeze in the wiki [2] I
> can get a feeling of some of the most relevant changes
The announcement of d-i releases contains most of the information
you're looking for:
alpha1: http://debian.org/devel/debia
Hello there d-i team & friends,
We are in the process of revamping the Release Notes for the Squeeze
release and one of the chapters in need of review/update is the
"Installation System" chapter [1]. This chapter should list the new
features of the d-i system for this specific re
W. Martin Borgert, le Sun 08 Feb 2009 23:23:39 +0100, a écrit :
> On 2009-02-08 22:57, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > For them, no, but for the people around that would help them to get
> > their first speakup-assisted installation running, it is. If they
> > have configuration issues (e.g. serial por
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
