Hi Dave,
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:33, Dave Beckett wrote:
> Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
> experimental debs for it at:
> http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
The "patch" below adds the correct line to the shlibs file in the lib
package so tha
On 6/14/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
If any powerpc people care, I build both 1.1.6 and
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:33:30AM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
> Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
> experimental debs for it at:
> http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
I performed the very same tests run with the 1.1.6:
- built an image of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - htt
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:55:53AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Or are you refering to the fact that the package is new in
> >experimental?
> >>
> >> It's not new yet. I'm waiting for somebody here to tell me to upload it
> >-
> >> and
On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or are you refering to the fact that the package is new in experimental?
>
> It's not new yet. I'm waiting for somebody here to tell me to upload it -
> and whether to set it for experimental or unstable.
I will build it for powerpc and s
Davide Viti wrote:
Last night I sent the following message which probably did
not get through because of the 90Kb attachement.
Sorry if this is the second time you rereceive this.
The patch is now available in [1].
i tested the updated patchfile and it's ok for me too, now the last two
miss
Last night I sent the following message which probably did
not get through because of the 90Kb attachement.
Sorry if this is the second time you rereceive this.
The patch is now available in [1].
regards,
Davide
[1] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/gtk+-directfb_2.8.17.patch.gz
--
On 6/13/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Don't forget as there are new deb packages here, there's at least a
>> month to
>> wait for the NEW "queue" to process them before you can use them after I
>> upload t
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've made another cairo 1.1.6-1 experimental deb set, this time there's a
>> new libcairo2-directfb-dev which can be parallel installed with the
>> libcairo2-dev and answers to 'pkgconfig cairo-directfb --libs' etc.
>>
>>
On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've made another cairo 1.1.6-1 experimental deb set, this time there's a
new libcairo2-directfb-dev which can be parallel installed with the
libcairo2-dev and answers to 'pkgconfig cairo-directfb --libs' etc.
It's in the same place as the othe
I've made another cairo 1.1.6-1 experimental deb set, this time there's a
new libcairo2-directfb-dev which can be parallel installed with the
libcairo2-dev and answers to 'pkgconfig cairo-directfb --libs' etc.
It's in the same place as the other packages:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experi
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
>
> You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
Here's a snippet of the message you're referring to:
"> On
> On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
>
> You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
Here's a snippet of the message you're referring to:
"> Only two pc files and two libs, right?"
"No: include
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
You don't need a linux machine to check that; grab the -dev.deb and
-dev.udeb in the link provided by Dave.
Ok, th
> > Have you checked it before stating they're the same?
>
> I don't have access to a linux machine now to test that. Have
> you checked?
Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
You don't need a linux machine to check that; grab the -dev.deb and
-dev.udeb in the link p
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Say what? The source is the same...
But compiled with different flags
> that's what I said about three mails ago.
Then what you said three mails ago is wrong.
I was asking then if they were the same... and nobody said that I was
wrong abou
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:51:05AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
> >
> >Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
> >the directfb one as well?
> >
> >> On
> Say what? The source is the same...
But compiled with different flags
> that's what I said about three mails ago.
Then what you said three mails ago is wrong.
> AFAICT there shouldn't be any difference
> beween the headers because they are the same headers. Are there any?
Have you checke
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
the directfb one as well?
> Only two pc files and two libs, right?
No: include files differ.
Say what? The sour
> Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
the directfb one as well?
> Only two pc files and two libs, right?
No: include files differ.
Davide
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:25:49AM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
>
> > Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
>
> Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
> the directfb one as well?
>
> > Only two pc files and two libs, right?
>
> No: include files
On 6/9/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:20:37PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > Hmm, thining again at the problem...
> > We are using now the same source for building the -directfb and the
> > regu
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:20:37PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > Hmm, thining again at the problem...
> > We are using now the same source for building the -directfb and the
> > regular cairo, right?
>
> yes
>
> > The compilation o
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Hmm, thining again at the problem...
> We are using now the same source for building the -directfb and the
> regular cairo, right?
yes
> The compilation of the libs is made from exactly the same code, but is
> just configured diffe
On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The "regular" and "-directfb" lib and -dev packages would need to be
>> > co-installable on a regular Debian system.
>>
>> That's not possible since both -dev packages
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:29:03PM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
> yes this change could be made, but this would require a patch to be made to
> gtk+2.0-directfb (udeb)'s configure to use pkgconfig cairo-directfb rather
> than pkgconfig cairo. Is that correct?
It is correct.
gtk+2.0-directfb (2.8.17
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The "regular" and "-directfb" lib and -dev packages would need to be
>> > co-installable on a regular Debian system.
>>
>> That's not possible since both -dev packages have to provide the same
>> file
>> /usr/lib/pkgconf
On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "regular" and "-directfb" lib and -dev packages would need to be
> co-installable on a regular Debian system.
That's not possible since both -dev packages have to provide the same file
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/cairo.pc and conflict, so that 'pkg
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 08:03, Dave Beckett wrote:
>> to include a libcairo2-directfb-udeb-dev package
>
> Hmm. There seems to be some misunderstanding here:
> - the -dev package is needed when _building_ other udebs that use the
> libcairo-directfb libs
> - so, the -dev pack
Hi Sven,
> Don't we need also a -fPIC version of the library, in order
> to the mklibs reduction ?
Yes we do, but I'd play safe and leave it as next step.
Getting out working (u)debs asap would means we could start
Pushing for the gtk+directf set of packages.
Just my 2 cents
Davide
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:11:38PM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> > Don't we need also a -fPIC version of the library, in order
> > to the mklibs reduction ?
>
> Yes we do, but I'd play safe and leave it as next step.
> Getting out working (u)debs asap would means we could start
> Push
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:22:00PM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
> > The "regular" and "-directfb" lib and -dev packages would need to be
> > co-installable on a regular Debian system.
> >
> > Sorry if we did not make this clear enough.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > FJP
> >
> > (Anybody please correct me if
I could have made it even simpler by saying that
"libcairo2-directfb-dev_1.1.6-1_i386.deb"
Is the same as "libcairo2-dev_1.1.6-1_i386.deb" apart the compilation
flags which select
The directfb backend.
Davide
> The "regular" and "-directfb" lib and -dev packages would need to be
> co-installable on a regular Debian system.
>
> Sorry if we did not make this clear enough.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
>
> (Anybody please correct me if any of this is incorrect!)
That's excatly what I was about to write;
I'll rep
Hmm. There seems to be some misunderstanding here:
[snip]
I think that also means that we are still missing one other package as
AFAIK a -dev package normally depends on a corresponding regular library
package. That would mean a package: libcairo2-directfb_1.1.6-1_i386.deb
Indeed.
So, we'd h
On Thursday 08 June 2006 08:03, Dave Beckett wrote:
> to include a libcairo2-directfb-udeb-dev package
Hmm. There seems to be some misunderstanding here:
- the -dev package is needed when _building_ other udebs that use the
libcairo-directfb libs
- so, the -dev package isn't a udeb and will neve
I've rebuilt the packaging of cairo 1.1.6-1 at
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
to include a libcairo2-directfb-udeb-dev package
Please give it a test
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Davide Viti wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>> To build the -directfb-dev package you can use the following options:
>>
>> "--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes"
>
> one strange thing i noticed with GTK 2.9.x only (2.8.17 is not affected)
> is that it requ
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:12:59AM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
> I took the package description from the Source: libcairo-directfb
> debian/control and there was no such libcairo2-directfb-dev in there.
I think it's because old gtk+ libs did not need cairo which was introduced
later on;
Can't reme
Viti Davide wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>> I've repackaged cairo completely and built cairo 1.1.6
>> experimental along with udebs just against directfb. The
>> result is sitting in http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
>> for now. I tested that the regular debs seem to work but I
>> can't
Davide Viti wrote:
Hey Dave,
In the meanwhile I can test your udeb.
Good news: I've run some tests and looks like the udeb is working fine!!
I grabbed a g-i image [1] created by Attilio and based on recent libs,
unpacked the initrd.gz file contained in the iso into a directory; I then
repl
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:32:26PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >"--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes"
>
> one strange thing i noticed with GTK 2.9.x only (2.8.17 is not affected)
> is that it requires cairo to be built with both pdf and ps backends
> enabled (m
Davide Viti wrote:
Hi Dave,
To build the -directfb-dev package you can use the following options:
"--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes"
one strange thing i noticed with GTK 2.9.x only (2.8.17 is not affected)
is that it requires cairo to be built with both pdf and
Hi Dave,
> I've repackaged cairo completely and built cairo 1.1.6
> experimental along with udebs just against directfb. The
> result is sitting in http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
> for now. I tested that the regular debs seem to work but I
> can't test the udeb.
>
> Let me k
Hey Dave,
> In the meanwhile I can test your udeb.
Good news: I've run some tests and looks like the udeb is working fine!!
I grabbed a g-i image [1] created by Attilio and based on recent libs,
unpacked the initrd.gz file contained in the iso into a directory; I then
replaced the libcairo files
Hi Dave,
To build the -directfb-dev package you can use the following options:
"--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes"
As soon as you've something ready to test, I'll use it to try and compile
the gtk+-directfb_2.8.17 packages, which is the last bit of the endless
stack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've repackaged cairo completely and built cairo 1.1.6 experimental
along with udebs just against directfb. The result is sitting in
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
for now. I tested that the regular debs seem to work but I can't test
On 6/6/06, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>That will imply 2 builds of the cairo sources with the results of each
>>>build in separate directories. I have a rough image in my head about
>>>how the package should be modified..
>>
>>On second thought (and after a look over the rule
Dave Beckett wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/6/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most important for us is that the libs in the udeb are built against
only
the directfb backend and not e.g. the X backend.
That will imply 2 builds of the cairo sources with the results of each
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/6/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Most important for us is that the libs in the udeb are built against
>> only
>> > the directfb backend and not e.g. the X backend.
>>
>> That will imply 2 builds of the cairo sources with the results of each
>> build in
Frans Pop wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:37, Dave Beckett wrote:
I can try to build one in a few days time but I'm unsure how I could
test it (in isolation) as I'm not familiar with udebs.
If you can provide a udeb, we can at least check its contents and I'm sure
that one of us w
On 6/6/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most important for us is that the libs in the udeb are built against only
> the directfb backend and not e.g. the X backend.
That will imply 2 builds of the cairo sources with the results of each
build in separate directories. I have a rough
On 6/6/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:37, Dave Beckett wrote:
> I can try to build one in a few days time but I'm unsure how I could
> test it (in isolation) as I'm not familiar with udebs.
If you can provide a udeb, we can at least check its contents
Hi Dave,
On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:37, Dave Beckett wrote:
> I can try to build one in a few days time but I'm unsure how I could
> test it (in isolation) as I'm not familiar with udebs.
If you can provide a udeb, we can at least check its contents and I'm sure
that one of us will be able to test
Dave Beckett wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
The graphical frontend to the debian-installer is now part of standard
daily builds and we're ready to switch to standard GTK+ and Cairo
libraries in their DFB version (a patch to add the DFB backend to
standard GTK+ 2.8.17 was already provided).
We
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> The graphical frontend to the debian-installer is now part of standard
> daily builds and we're ready to switch to standard GTK+ and Cairo
> libraries in their DFB version (a patch to add the DFB backend to
> standard GTK+ 2.8.17 was already provided).
> We're curretly w
57 matches
Mail list logo
