> On 6/9/06, Viti Davide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you think I would have said that without having checked before? > > You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
Here's a snippet of the message you're referring to: "> Only two pc files and two libs, right?" "No: include files differ." I said they differ; if you don't trust what I said is up to you to double check it yourself. > So the conclusion is that, because the cairo-features.h and > the cairo libraries have the same name, there should be two > -dev packages after all... Yes. I would say that there should be two different packages not Just because of the conflicting names, but mainly because I would Not want the -directf libs if my system does not use directfb. > each with its own pc file, lib > file(s) and headers. These should be installable on the same > system... (or am I wrong again?), thus the cairo headers will > probably be placed under distict directories under > usr/include (same for libs, but adapted and probably the > directfb library can be renamed). (With my poor knowledge of packages and policy) I would use /usr/include/directfb which is already used by directfb itself. Davide
