Bug#1065561: marked as done (console-setup: typos in documentation)

Your message dated Thu, 30 May 2024 10:19:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065561: fixed in console-setup 1.227 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065561, regarding console-setup: typos in documentation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: Bug#1065561: console-setup: typos in documentation

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #1065561 [src:console-setup] console-setup: typos in documentation Added tag(s) pending. -- 1065561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065561 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1065561: console-setup: typos in documentation

Control: tags -1 + pending Applied, thanks!

Bug#1065561: console-setup: typos in documentation

Source: console-setup Version: 1.226 Severity: minor Tags: patch -- Jakub Wilk diff --git a/README.legacyfonts b/README.legacyfonts index a707fcc..2078725 100644 --- a/README.legacyfonts +++ b/README.legacyfonts @@ -4,3 +4,3 @@ LEGACY FONTS: CONVERSION FROM PSF TO BDF -The traditional font coll

Re: please supply some documentation for bootnetx64.efi. Also choosing different preseed for each netboot.

Alex King writes: > I need to do a EFI network (boot and) install, and I'm wondering if this > file (bootnetx64.efi) can help me. But there is no documentation on it > (except the suggestion in the install manual > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch04

Re: please supply some documentation for bootnetx64.efi. Also choosing different preseed for each netboot.

On 9/23/23 15:17, Alex King wrote: I need to do a EFI network (boot and) install, and I'm wondering if this file (bootnetx64.efi) can help me.  But there is no documentation on it (except the suggestion in the install manual https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch04s05.en.html#

please supply some documentation for bootnetx64.efi. Also choosing different preseed for each netboot.

I need to do a EFI network (boot and) install, and I'm wondering if this file (bootnetx64.efi) can help me. But there is no documentation on it (except the suggestion in the install manual https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch04s05.en.html#dhcpd "specify a boot loader a

Bug#1031738: installation-guide: documentation about limits to kernel boot parameters is outdated

Source: installation-guide Followup-For: Bug #1031738 I'm attempting to rephrase the documentation related to this bug in a merge request on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide/-/merge_requests/24/ If anyone would like to review the suggested changes there (or

Processed: Re: installation-guide: documentation about limits to kernel boot parameters is outdated

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1031738 [src:installation-guide] installation-guide: documentation about limits to kernel boot parameters is outdated Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1031738 to the same tags previously set -- 1031738: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Bug#1031738: installation-guide: documentation about limits to kernel boot parameters is outdated

Source: installation-guide Followup-For: Bug #1031738 Control: tags -1 patch Please note: the patch previously offered here isn't suitable; it turns out that the param limits described in it (32 for Linux, 128 for User Mode Linux) apply only to the number of argument items that are passed to the '

Bug#1031738: installation-guide: documentation about limits to kernel boot parameters is outdated

Source: installation-guide Version: 20220129~deb11u1 Severity: normal Tags: d-i patch Dear Maintainer, Some of the documentation related to limits in Linux kernel boot parameters in the installation guide is outdated. For example, the section describing[1] use of boot parameters for preseeding

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Hi, Am 3. August 2021 01:55:06 MESZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois : >Petter Reinholdtsen (2021-08-02): >> I had a look at the 6.4 section about isenkram, and it looked good to >> me. > >Thanks for your feedback! I tested this today on my T60, and it works great: it detected missing firmware for my re

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Petter Reinholdtsen (2021-08-02): > I had a look at the 6.4 section about isenkram, and it looked good to > me. Thanks for your feedback! Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signatur

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

I had a look at the 6.4 section about isenkram, and it looked good to me. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Holger Wansing (2021-07-30): > And regarding your comment > > - Documenting what isenkram-autoinstall-firmware does means we should > >check what happens for each major release, to keep up with the > >current implementation. Doing that once every two years doesn't seem > >unreasonabl

Bug#991627: marked as done (installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation)

Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2021 19:33:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#991627: fixed in installation-guide 20210730 has caused the Debian Bug report #991627, regarding installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:07:41 +0200): > I think I'll wait a little (a few hours) in case someone else wants to > chime in, but I'll probably upload this shortly (this European evening). > I'm assuming the l10n robot will update the po files once I've pushed > this to master

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote (Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:11:13 +0200): > > > I'm not very used to best practices when it comes to end-user doc in > > > general and to the installation-guide package in general, so I'd be > > > happy for other to build on those suggested changes, and amend/reword > > > as req

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Fri, 30 Jul 2021 03:44:44 +0200): > pu/firmware-v1 exists now. > > > I'm not very used to best practices when it comes to end-user doc in > > general and to the installation-guide package in general, so I'd be > > happy for other to build on those suggested changes, an

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Holger Wansing (2021-07-30): > Don't know, if I am better in this respect, but here we go :-) Thanks. :) > Regarding the mentioning of "black screen": > I seem to remember that there were also reports, that people had a garbled > display instead of a black screen, so we should way something like

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Holger Wansing writes: ... > I would add an additional "automatically" to make more clear, that adding > the sources.list.d file is done without user intervention: I'd suggest saying "for you" rather than "automatically", as well as perhaps another couple of changes to make it completely clear t

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

Cyril Brulebois (2021-07-29): > [ RT and isenkram maintainers in the loop for information ] [ removed now. ] > At first glance, I'm proposing: > - not to change 2.1.5; > - to amend 2.2, mentioning graphics cards might be problematic, and >mentioning nomodeset as a possible workaround (plus

Bug#991627: installation-guide: expand firmware-related documentation

://bugs.debian.org/989863 which is trying to be a bit more helpful regarding firmware problems. Looking at the amd64 documentation, there are several places where firmware is mentioned: - 2.1.5, which basically points at 2.2. → https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/ch02s01#gfx - 2.2, which

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 05:08:33AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 05/12/2021 03:09 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Steve McIntyre (2021-05-12): > > > So look around the other projects under the installer-team umbrella. > > > The same still applies for messages in the installation - look in the >

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On 05/12/2021 03:09 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Steve McIntyre (2021-05-12): So look around the other projects under the installer-team umbrella. The same still applies for messages in the installation - look in the templates files. The translation process implies gathering all templates into

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

Steve McIntyre (2021-05-12): > So look around the other projects under the installer-team umbrella. > The same still applies for messages in the installation - look in the > templates files. The translation process implies gathering all templates into a central location, which might make it easy

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:14:35PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: >On 05/12/2021 09:39 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >> You're looking for >> >>https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/grub-installer/ >> >> - that matches up with the grub-installer directory in what Andy was >> looking at. "inst

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On 05/12/2021 09:39 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:27:50AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 05/12/2021 08:37 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: debian-installer/packages/grub-installer/debian is your starting point Using the MATE search tool I don't find such a directory. Is t

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:27:50AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: >On 05/12/2021 08:37 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >> > > >> > > debian-installer/packages/grub-installer/debian is your starting point >> > >> > Using the MATE search tool I don't find such a directory. >> > Is that a portion of a UR

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On 05/12/2021 08:37 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:53:24AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 05/10/2021 11:02 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:00:01AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 05/10/2021 09:32 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Mon, May 10, 20

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 07:53:24AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 05/10/2021 11:02 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:00:01AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 05/10/2021 09:32 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Richard Owl

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On 05/10/2021 11:02 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:00:01AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 05/10/2021 09:32 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: Debian's goal might be described as providing "the most power to a m

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:00:01AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 05/10/2021 09:32 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > Debian's goal might be described as providing "the most power to a > > > maximally > > > diverse audience". M

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On 05/10/2021 09:32 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: Debian's goal might be described as providing "the most power to a maximally diverse audience". My underlying problem is that it does that *TOO* well. I need two types of information

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

Am 10. Mai 2021 16:32:25 MESZ schrieb "Andrew M.A. Cater" : >On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: >> I. Text of error/cautionary messages. >> Specifically, what is the _exact_ text of the message given when the >> operator chooses to install neither Grub nor LILO

Re: Extracting documentation from Debian installer

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 08:18:06AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > Debian's goal might be described as providing "the most power to a maximally > diverse audience". My underlying problem is that it does that *TOO* well. > > I need two types of information that I doubt are documented anywhere except

Extracting documentation from Debian installer

Debian's goal might be described as providing "the most power to a maximally diverse audience". My underlying problem is that it does that *TOO* well. I need two types of information that I doubt are documented anywhere except in the source code. I. Text of error/cautionary messages. Sp

Bug#556999: marked as done (Should adapt documentation about booting from an ISO image to GRUB2)

Your message dated Tue, 19 May 2020 21:47:02 +0200 with message-id <20200519214702.ad30c35022fa513d21dab...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Bug#556999: Should adapt documentation about booting from an ISO image to GRUB2 has caused the Debian Bug report #556999, regarding Should

Re: Bug#556999: Should adapt documentation about booting from an ISO image to GRUB2

Version: 20120826 Tonda Míšek wrote: > 1. Problem to boot from ISO image > I use GRUB2 and I had problem to find the way how to boot from ISO image. The > documentation describes only GRUB legacy. Please add something like: > menuentry "installation mini.iso" { &

Bug#768573: marked as done (more documentation in the UI needed & install Synaptic)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Apr 2019 01:51:07 + with message-id and subject line not relevant has caused the Debian Bug report #768573, regarding more documentation in the UI needed & install Synaptic to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#864037: marked as done ("If You Are New to Unix" should point to existing and non-ancient documentation)

Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:20:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#864037: fixed in installation-guide 20180923 has caused the Debian Bug report #864037, regarding "If You Are New to Unix" should point to existing and non-ancient documentation to be marked as d

Bug#864037: "If You Are New to Unix" should point to existing and non-ancient documentation

can also be found in the Debian > Reference. This list of Unix FAQs contains a number of UseNet documents > which provide a nice historical reference. > > Linux is an implementation of Unix. The Linux Documentation Project (LDP) > collects a number of HOWTOs and online bo

Processed: Re: Bug#864037: "If You Are New to Unix" should point to existing and non-ancient documentation

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #864037 [src:installation-guide] "If You Are New to Unix" should point to existing and non-ancient documentation Added tag(s) pending. -- 864037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864037 Debian Bug Tracking Syst

Bug#864268: Documentation mentions ext3 as default filesystem

Maxime Buquet (2017-06-05): > Source: debian-installer > Version: 20170525 > > The documentation[0] still states that ext3 is the default filesystem. > This should probably be updated to ext4. > > [0]: > https://sources.debian.net/src/debian-installer/20170525/doc/devel

Bug#864268: Documentation mentions ext3 as default filesystem

Source: debian-installer Version: 20170525 The documentation[0] still states that ext3 is the default filesystem. This should probably be updated to ext4. [0]: https://sources.debian.net/src/debian-installer/20170525/doc/devel/partman-auto-recipe.txt -- Maxime “pep” Buquet signature.asc

Bug#864037: "If You Are New to Unix" should point to existing and non-ancient documentation

documents which provide a nice historical reference. Linux is an implementation of Unix. The Linux Documentation Project (LDP) collects a number of HOWTOs and online books relating to Linux. Most of these documents can be installed locally; just install the doc-linux-html package (HTML

Bug#858308: flash-kernel: documentation for upgrading Odroid-U2/U3 to flash-kernel

ose packages for > such documentation. This doc is for converting to flash-kernel (and other modern bits), thus I went for flash-kernel first. You guys know what would be appropriate better than me. > Perhaps a wiki page under wiki.debian.org/DebianOn might be better? Or > the insta

Bug#858308: flash-kernel: documentation for upgrading Odroid-U2/U3 to flash-kernel

On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 00:31 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > Package: flash-kernel Not sure that this (or u-boot) is really the best place for it, it certainly wouldn't occur to look under either of those packages for such documentation. Perhaps a wiki page under wiki.debian.org/DebianOn

Bug#858308: flash-kernel: documentation for upgrading Odroid-U2/U3 to flash-kernel

hours of searching I found no information how to do that. The only way seems to be using the U2 itself. Which is a dangerous thing as if anything goes wrong you won't be able to boot. Fortunately, recovery is possible with a micro-USB cable and a SD card with a special image: http://forum.od

Bug#858308: flash-kernel: documentation for upgrading Odroid-U2/U3 to flash-kernel

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:31:46AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > If you're booting from a SD card, skip until running sd-fusing.sh > > > Edit sd_fusing.sh, change sector numbers to those listed in s/sd_fusing.sh/sd-fusing.sh/ > > Run: > . > ./sd-fusing.sh /dev/mmcblk0boot0 > `

Bug#858308: flash-kernel: documentation for upgrading Odroid-U2/U3 to flash-kernel

cable and a SD card with a special image: http://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=969 -- I did not have the need to test that, though. On the U2, you need to unlock the secret partition first: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/mmc/mmc-dev-parts.txt . echo 0 > /sys/block/mm

Bug#824877: marked as done (tasksel outdated documentation for *.desc files location.)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:04:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824877: fixed in tasksel 3.39 has caused the Debian Bug report #824877, regarding tasksel outdated documentation for *.desc files location. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: Re: Bug#824877: tasksel outdated documentation for *.desc files location.

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #824877 [tasksel] tasksel outdated documentation for *.desc files location. Added tag(s) pending. -- 824877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#824877: tasksel outdated documentation for *.desc files location.

Control: tag -1 pending Hi, Volchak, Zakhar (Zach) (2016-05-20): > Package: tasksel > Version: 3.34 > Tags: patch > > The man page lists the old location of tasksel tasks. This was > changed from /usr/share/tasksel/ to /usr/share/tasksel/desc/ > in 2011. Thanks! That's almost correct, since y

Bug#838919: Proposed documentation, please comment! [was Re: Bug#838919: debian-installer: please calculate swap parition according to max RAM...]

is why I went with the delete, resize create method rather than attempting to resize, because I'm not sure if resizing encrypted swap is supported...and I have no experience with encrypting disks/partitions/LVs. If the format is for lay users, using a GUI, then including screenshots

Bug#824877: tasksel outdated documentation for *.desc files location.

Package: tasksel Version: 3.34 Tags: patch The man page lists the old location of tasksel tasks. This was changed from /usr/share/tasksel/ to /usr/share/tasksel/desc/ in 2011. fix-tasksel_pod.patch Description: fix-tasksel_pod.patch

Re: Bad release in install documentation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everybody > El 15/03/16 a las 23:58, Laura Arjona Reina escribió: [...] > >> >> I've tried to (manually) run the build of the installation manual >> for jessie, and I think it went ok. This is what I did, based on >> the lessoften script [1]: >

Re: Bad release in install documentation

Hi, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > Ok, it seems the jessie installation guide is published correctly and > it's not overwritten with lessoften script. > > I don't know if there should be a stretch installation guide right now, > or only after stretch is published as stable. > The page https://

Re: Bad release in install documentation

Hi everybody El 15/03/16 a las 23:58, Laura Arjona Reina escribió: [...] > > I've tried to (manually) run the build of the installation manual for > jessie, and I think it went ok. > This is what I did, based on the lessoften script [1]: > > ls -t1 /srv/www.debian.org/cron/ftpfiles/pool/install

Re: Bad release in install documentation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everybody El 08/03/16 a las 12:18, Rhonda D'Vine escribió: > * Laura Arjona Reina [2016-03-07 20:25:12 > CET]: >> El 23/02/16 a las 20:27, Holger Wansing escribió: >>> Holger Wansing wrote: For the time being: Looking at h

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

Hi, Rhonda D'Vine wrote: > * Holger Wansing [2016-03-07 10:33:15 CET]: > > Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > > > I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted > > > to > > > look at, but couldn't put time yet. > > > I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. >

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

* Holger Wansing [2016-03-07 10:33:15 CET]: > Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > > I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted to > > look at, but couldn't put time yet. > > I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. > > > > That would be fine indeed. > > Whil

Re: Bad release in install documentation

* Laura Arjona Reina [2016-03-07 20:25:12 CET]: > El 23/02/16 a las 20:27, Holger Wansing escribió: > > Holger Wansing wrote: > >> For the time being: > >> > >> Looking at > >> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debwww/cron.git/commit/lessoften-parts/1installation-guide?id=c8148aba41b484964cb7a627c5

Re: Bad release in install documentation

>>>>> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in >>>>> abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says >>>>> about stable release. >>>> >>>> It's worse than that: it s

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

Hi, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > I'm in debwww since some days ago and this is one of the things I wanted to > look at, but couldn't put time yet. > I hope I can have a look at it in the following days. > That would be fine indeed. While I think about, if recruting new people to the team would

Re: debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

; > > > Hello, >> > > > >> > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: >> > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It >says in >> > > > > abstract that the documentation is

debian-www / debian-doc teams no longer responsive [Was: Re: Bad release in install documentation]

t; > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > > > > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > > > > > about stable release. > > > > > > > > It's worse than that:

Re: Bad release in install documentation

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): > > > Hello, > > > > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It

Re: Bad release in install documentation

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): > > Hello, > > > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > > > abstract that the documentation is for deb

Re: Bad release in install documentation

Samuel Thibault (2016-02-06): > Hello, > > a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > > about stable release. &g

Re: Bad release in install documentation

Hello, a a, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 11:03:19 +, wrote: > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in > abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says > about stable release. It's worse than that: it seems it's really

Bad release in install documentation

Hi I found a typo in https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/index.html.en. It says in abstract that the documentation is for debian strech and the url says about stable release. Thank You ewew

Bug#293741: marked as done (debian-installer-manual: PDF output it ugly, inconsistent with other Debian documentation)

Your message dated Tue, 5 May 2015 22:02:44 +0200 with message-id <20150505220244.f2bd8477ba57451f054bc...@wansing-online.de> and subject line #293741: debian-installer-manual: PDF output it ugly, inconsistent with other Debian documentation has caused the Debian Bug report #293741, reg

Bug#762732: marked as done (libdebian-installer: please do not write timestamps in Doxygen generated documentation)

Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:56:36 +0100 with message-id <20150109145636.ga3...@mapreri.org> and subject line fixed in 0.97 has caused the Debian Bug report #762732, regarding libdebian-installer: please do not write timestamps in Doxygen generated documentation to be marked a

Bug#762732: marked as done (libdebian-installer: please do not write timestamps in Doxygen generated documentation)

Your message dated Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:32:37 +0100 with message-id <20150106193237.ga20...@mapreri.org> and subject line fixed in 0.97 has caused the Debian Bug report #762732, regarding libdebian-installer: please do not write timestamps in Doxygen generated documentation to be marked a

Bug#768573: more documentation in the UI needed & install Synaptic

Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version:cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_beta_2/i386/iso-cd/debian-jessie-DI-b2-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso Date: 2014-10-03 18:55 Machine: E2160@3Ghz@AsusP5QldPro,2GB@800Mhz, GT440, SSDNow 120GB Processor:E2160@3Ghz Memory:2GB@800Mhz Partitions:

Bug#762732: libdebian-installer: please do not write timestamps in Doxygen generated documentation

Source: libdebian-installer Version: 0.96 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! As part of the “reproducible builds” project [1], we have identified that libdebian-installer writes the current date and time in the documentation

Confict [debian installer] vs [installer documentation] ?

will also be increased back to the original level when the next component executed finishes successfully.' Should this bug be reported against installer or the documentation? Having only dialup and thus unable to download Jessie, is it correct to report it as a possible bug in Jes

Bug#740619: debian-installer: contrary to documentation hostname is not from dhcp

a leases file with the correct hostname. the default in the prompt is still debian. with further reading it appears that this may actually be from rdns, which I don't have setup yet and would be reasonable but contrary to all official documentation. Can we please clarify where the hostname s

Bug#740500: debian-installer: amd64 documentation is incorrect/incomplete ("isohybrid" issues)

Package: debian-installer Version: stable Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch04s03.html.en Documentation is out of date - does not mention that this the amd64 images are "isohybrid" BIOS/EFI boot format, with both a MBR/GPT partit

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

required if you want to stay in X. For a spur of >> > > the moment need for information there is w3m in a terminal. >> > >> > How do you start a terminal? Going through the main menu is not an >> > option, one often needs to have both the question being asked by deb

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

workspace is selectable. The documentation is only is a URL away. > > Ok, but that's not the case with at least gnome/lxde. As mentioned in a > previous mail, that's what this bug could be about (documenting "use > the xfce liveCD" seems quite lazy to me) I wouldn

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

t; > the moment need for information there is w3m in a terminal. > > > > How do you start a terminal? Going through the main menu is not an > > option, one often needs to have both the question being asked by debconf > > and the documentation at hand. > > I should h

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

How do you start a terminal? Going through the main menu is not an > option, one often needs to have both the question being asked by debconf > and the documentation at hand. I should have been clearer: CTRL-ALT-F1 With the Xfce Live image the installer window can be minimised. Also, it does not

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

hat's not really a good > > solution. > > Yes, planning ahead is required if you want to stay in X. For a spur of > the moment need for information there is w3m in a terminal. How do you start a terminal? Going through the main menu is not an option, one often needs to have

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

On Wed 19 Sep 2012 at 11:23:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Brian, le Wed 19 Sep 2012 10:15:44 +0100, a écrit : > > > > Boot into a live sytem. Start a browser. Start d-i. ALT-TAB between the > > two. Or CTRL-ALT-Fx for a virtual terminal. > > The feature you requested exists. Surely the bug c

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Brian, le Wed 19 Sep 2012 10:15:44 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed 19 Sep 2012 at 03:14:05 +0200, lee wrote: > > > Richard Owlett writes: > > > > > Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and > > > into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers? > > > > One sho

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

On Wed 19 Sep 2012 at 03:14:05 +0200, lee wrote: > Richard Owlett writes: > > > Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and > > into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers? > > One should be able to. Since I haven't tried the life-installer yet, I > d

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Jon Dowland writes: > The installer (in expert mode) supports an ssh client on an alternative > VT, afaik. One can connect to another machine with stuff already > installed via this if necessary. Surely this is sufficient to address > the request. This requires you to have the other machine you

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Richard Owlett writes: > Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and > into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers? One should be able to. Since I haven't tried the life-installer yet, I don't know what's possible. It would be nice if one could switch

Re: Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Brian Potkin, le Mon 17 Sep 2012 18:13:01 +0100, a écrit : > On Mon 17 Sep 2012 at 11:57:14 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Richard Owlett wrote: > > > Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and > > > into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers? > > > > O

Re: Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

On Mon 17 Sep 2012 at 11:57:14 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Richard Owlett wrote: > > Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and > > into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers? > > One should, but as d-i on the live CD is currently implemented, one > cann

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Joey Hess, le Mon 17 Sep 2012 11:57:14 -0400, a écrit : > Richard Owlett wrote: > > Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and > > into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers? > > One should, but as d-i on the live CD is currently implemented, one > cann

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Richard Owlett wrote: > Should one not be able to switch out of the installation process and > into a browser (2 are already included) to search out answers? One should, but as d-i on the live CD is currently implemented, one cannot. d-i runs as a fullscreen window, and I couldn't see any easily-d

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

The installer (in expert mode) supports an ssh client on an alternative VT, afaik. One can connect to another machine with stuff already installed via this if necessary. Surely this is sufficient to address the request. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

up in development teams. If you want a web browser, an IRC client, games, etc. in D-I, then please come and first fix issues related to GRUB and encrypted partitions, partitions sizes, preseeding, documentation, etc. *Then* we'll see if we add a web browser. As I tried to say elsewhere in this

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

ver show up in development teams. If you want a web browser, an IRC client, games, etc. in D-I, then please come and first fix issues related to GRUB and encrypted partitions, partitions sizes, preseeding, documentation, etc. *Then* we'll see if we add a web browser. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Richard Owlett, le Sun 16 Sep 2012 08:32:55 -0500, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > >lee, le Sun 16 Sep 2012 04:29:21 +0200, a écrit : > >>The goal would be to give users a working system included on the > >>installer CD/DVD that provides them at least with a (graphical) web > >>browser, softwa

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Samuel Thibault writes: > lee, le Sun 16 Sep 2012 04:29:21 +0200, a écrit : >> The goal would be to give users a working system included on the >> installer CD/DVD that provides them at least with a (graphical) web >> browser, software to burn installation CDs/DVDs/bluerays, an irc >> client and

Bug#687804: installation-reports: users are not able to review external documentation while stuck in the installer

Samuel Thibault wrote: lee, le Sun 16 Sep 2012 04:29:21 +0200, a écrit : The goal would be to give users a working system included on the installer CD/DVD that provides them at least with a (graphical) web browser, software to burn installation CDs/DVDs/bluerays, an irc client and other useful t

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >