Correction: The issue occurs only in graphical and text modes of
installation, but not in liveCD. LiveCD installation (somewhat)
correctly warns about the lack of space (says 10G is needed)
It should have been:
d-i debian-installer/language string en
d-i debian-installer/countrystring CH
d-i debian-installer/locale string en_US.UTF-8
The fallbacklocale was just copy+paste of my last attempt to overcome this
problem...
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 12/6/19 4:36 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > I would like to fix a template of partman-base package.
> > I think there is the word 'filesystem' missing:
> >
> >
> > Template: partman/text/there_is_detected
> > Type: text
> > # :sl2:
> >
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Template: partman/text/there_is_detected
> > Type: text
> > # :sl2:
> > - _Description: This partition is formatted with the ${FILESYSTEM}.
> > + _Description: This partition is formatted with the ${FILESYSTEM}
> > filesystem.
> >
> >
> > Adding debian-
Hello!
On 12/6/19 4:36 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> I would like to fix a template of partman-base package.
> I think there is the word 'filesystem' missing:
>
>
> Template: partman/text/there_is_detected
> Type: text
> # :sl2:
> - _Description: This partition is formatted with the ${FILESY
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:36:22PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to fix a template of partman-base package.
>I think there is the word 'filesystem' missing:
>
>
> Template: partman/text/there_is_detected
> Type: text
> # :sl2:
>- _Description: This partition is formatted with
Hi,
I would like to fix a template of partman-base package.
I think there is the word 'filesystem' missing:
Template: partman/text/there_is_detected
Type: text
# :sl2:
- _Description: This partition is formatted with the ${FILESYSTEM}.
+ _Description: This partition is formatted with the $
Your message dated Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:18:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692314: fixed in installation-guide 20130208
has caused the Debian Bug report #692314,
regarding installation-guide: A.3. Installation: A correction or two
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Control: tag -1 pending
Cyril Brulebois (26/12/2012):
> Brian Potkin (26/12/2012):
> > The revised attached patch should hopefully be more acceptable.
>
> Indeed, looks good, thanks.
Also committed:
$ debcommit -a
svn commit -m 'Improve documentation about user accounts: move it to the right
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #692314 [installation-guide] installation-guide: A.3. Installation: A
correction or two
Added tag(s) pending.
--
692314: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692314
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Brian Potkin (26/12/2012):
> The revised attached patch should hopefully be more acceptable.
Indeed, looks good, thanks.
> --- manual/en/howto/installation-howto.xml2012-12-26 12:48:12.306325172
> +
> +++ manual/en/howto/installation-howto_users-2.xml2012-12-26
> 13:22:34.0
On Thu 20 Dec 2012 at 12:19:20 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >
> >
> > +Setting up your clock and time zone is followed by the creation of user
> > accounts. By
> > +default you are asked to provide a password for the root
> > +(administrator) account and information necessary to create one
Hi Brian,
Brian Potkin (09/12/2012):
> On Sun 04 Nov 2012 at 22:01:43 +, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > Also, whatevever may be meant by "default", the root account password
> > is not required and can be left blank.
>
> Here's a patch.
> --- manual/en/howto/installation-howto.xml2012-12-07 11
On Sun 04 Nov 2012 at 22:01:43 +, Brian Potkin wrote:
> A.3. Installation for en.i386 has:
>
>Installation of the base system is followed by setting up user
>accounts. By default you will need to provide a password for the
>“root” (administrator) account and information necessary
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
A.3. Installation for en.i386 has:
Installation of the base system is followed by setting up user
accounts. By default you will need to provide a password for the
“root” (administrator) account and information necessary to create
This is correct path (wheezy d-i, not sid).
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/wheezy_d-i/current/i386/iso-cd/
Gasha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://list
Well I haven't see this thst way. I hate to dump working computer, I really
like to reycle old computer with Linux but I guess I'll have to deal with
openBSD or NetBSD for these machines. (SparcStation 5 and SparcClassic)
:(
Thanks for the reply
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Steve Langase
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:01:25AM -0500, Julien Savard wrote:
> Debian Sarge was the last to officially support all sparc32 systems (wich
> include sun4, sun4c, sun4d and sun4m). Etch support only sun4m and lenny
> only support sparc64. I have an old SparcStation5 ans a Sparc Classic wich
> are bo
The SparcStation 5 have CD-Rom drvie but it's broken (don't mount any CD).
The SparcClassic simply don't have Cd-Rom drive. I tried via floppies but it
was pain in the neck. I'm just installing it via tftp image.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Julien Savard w
Hello,
Julien Savard wrote:
> If you have any suggestion exept tweaking old debian installer I'm open to
> any idea.
Which installation media do you use?
Do you have the possibility to boot from cdrom?
In that case, it should be possible to use a full binary installation cd
and install complete
Hi,
Debian Sarge was the last to officially support all sparc32 systems (wich
include sun4, sun4c, sun4d and sun4m). Etch support only sun4m and lenny
only support sparc64. I have an old SparcStation5 ans a Sparc Classic wich
are both sun4m. I already tried NetBsd but it's way too slow. Furthermore
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:24:11PM -0500, Julien Savard wrote:
> I'm looking for something really particular. I'm trying to correct the
> debian sarge installation script and maybe adapt it to archive.debian.org as
> it's main mirror. It seems when the installation script was created t
Hi,
I'm looking for something really particular. I'm trying to correct the
debian sarge installation script and maybe adapt it to archive.debian.org as
it's main mirror. It seems when the installation script was created the
developper didn't have in mind that the "mirror tree" would change. You can
Correction: keyboard actually works in the system installed using
Squeeze beta1, but not in installer itself. There is a kernel version
difference, installer has 2.6.32-25 while installed system ends up
with 2.6.32-27. Trying to figure out whether this makes a difference
now.
Best regards
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:44:38 +0530
with message-id
and subject line fixed in svn
has caused the Debian Bug report #587403,
regarding Spelling correction for ml_IN localised name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: localechooser
Severity: important
Tags: patch, l10n
Hi,
patch for fixing a spelling mistake in ml_IN localised name is
attached. Please correct it. Thanks for Santhosh Thottingal to bring
this to my notice.
Thanks
Praveen
Maintainer of Malayalam translations of Debian Installer
--
പ്രവ
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 564033 tasksel forces installation of many useless packages on hr
> locale setups
Bug #564033 [tasksel] tasksel forces installation of various l10n packages,
making them all more important than 'standard', which they are not
Changed Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 500378 - lenny-ignore
Bug#500378: segfaults parsing status file
Tags were: lenny-ignore
Tags removed: lenny-ignore
> tags 445507 + lenny-ignore
Bug#445507: not working on mipsel - initrd not starting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny-ignor
I realized I mistated the situation in my first report. /boot is on a
RAID1 device created at the same time as the RAID1 device for the LVM
volume group. When LVM is activated, partman loses
the fact that a device is associated with /boot.
--
And that's my crabbing done for the day. Go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> I've committed the following change because the rule is that we try to keep
> backwards compatibility with earlier kernel versions in kernel-wedge and
> linux-kernel-di-*-2.6 packages.
> Please
Hi Otavio,
I've committed the following change because the rule is that we try to keep
backwards compatibility with earlier kernel versions in kernel-wedge and
linux-kernel-di-*-2.6 packages.
Please keep that in mind when making changes!
Cheers,
FJP
Index: debian/changelog
The image which is missing is root.img, not boot.img.
Looking at build_floppy_root.log
(http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/build_floppy_root.log)
It does seem as if the required files cannot fit on a single floppydisk anymore.
Nayden
-
Ahhh
First of all, when trying to boot my system after installing the S-ATA
card and drive, GRUB gave me the (cute?) error: "GRUB GRUB GRUB ...",
filling the screen.
Secondly, the first try to write GRUB to (hd0) from the rescue menu
actually succeeded without error, but the system remained unbootable
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402142: fixed in flash-kernel 1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 402142 + pending
Bug#402142: flash-kernel: Minor correction to comment in source code
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 402142 + pending
thanks
* Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-08 13:09]:
> # the remainder of the image, and the remaining bytes are zero. Generate
> # this header.
>
> should say "first *four* bytes".
Done in SVN, thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 0.7
Severity: minor
Current comment:
# See http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Info/BootFlash -- the NSLU2 uses a
# 16 byte MTD header, the first two bytes (big endian) give the length of
# the remainder of the image, and the remaining bytes are zero. Generate
# this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 368740 !
Bug#368740: installation-report: newly installed system failed to boot
(presumably due to lack of SATA support in stock kernel)
Changed Bug submitter from root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Marvin Renich <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stop
Hi,
correcting a minor error in the original report:
>uname -a: did not get that far
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.27-1-sparc64 #1 Mon Aug 23 23:59:55 PDT 2004 sparc64 unknown
Herbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
>Luca Ingianni wrote:
>> Package: debian-installer
>> Severity: minor
>> Tags: experimental
>>
>> /tmp/reportbug-debian-installer-6472-QGSR2p
>
>Your bug reporter seems to be broken.
No, I'm broken. I misunderstood the reportbug manpage.
I also filed this bug as #266821 (install-report). My apol
Please use the font arial!
--- Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp11.gatelock.com.tw)
** 中毒檔案 corrected_doc.pif 已刪除。
Trend GateLock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (主機：higp11.gatelock.com.tw)
** 在檔案 corrected_doc.pif 中發現病毒 WOR
One correction: LVM physical volume is hda5 not hda1, I tried to create
pv on physical partition but d-i did not want to configure it (why?).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I read this
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=debian-installer&ver=20040303&arch=hppa&stamp=1078663228&file=log&as=raw
and to correct this failure, I added a build depends on palo [hppa].
To do this, I was forced to make a new entry in build/debian/changelog.
I hope I did the right th
s Marteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: install-doc: correction for PA-RISC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: install-doc
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-22
Severity: minor
In the documention, f
Package: install-doc
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-22
Severity: minor
In the documention, for hppa, the cpu is named PA/RISC. But, officially,
the good way is PA-RISC (cf http://www.debian.org/ports/hppa)
I think that a sed "s/PA\/RISC/PA-RISC/g" should be enough to correct
that issue.
Thomas
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 07:39:36PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > > > > - bufT = _("A swap partition is strongly recommended to
> > > > > > provide virtual memory for your system, yet no swap partitions were
>
> > I think the following
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 09:15:04AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> Package: install-doc
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-13
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> I've found out some typo problems in boot-new.sgml
> Moreover There was some mistakes about Linux versus GNU/Linux
Thank you for your pat
Poindessous wrote:
> > > > Here is a small correction (sorry for the 80 cols)
> > > >
> > > > +++ /tmp/main_menu.cSun Apr 7 01:13:12 2002
> > > > @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
> > > > */
> > >
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:25:25AM -0500, David Stanaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 01:56, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> > > Here is a small correction (sorry for the 80 cols)
&g
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 01:56, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> > Here is a small correction (sorry for the 80 cols)
> >
> > --- main_menu.c Tue Feb 12 22:29:37 2002
> > +++ /tmp/main_m
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> Here is a small correction (sorry for the 80 cols)
>
> --- main_menu.c Tue Feb 12 22:29:37 2002
> +++ /tmp/main_menu.cSun Apr 7 01:13:12 2002
> @
Le dim 07/04/2002 à 02:37, Junichi Uekawa a écrit :
> Thomas Poindessous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > I still have some display problems with boxes which display over other
> > boxes. I'm trying to find it in dbootstrap code, but it's hard.
> >
>
> Which version of whiptail
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> Here is a small correction (sorry for the 80 cols)
>
> --- main_menu.c Tue Feb 12 22:29:37 2002
> +++ /tmp/main_menu.cSun Apr 7 01:13:12 2002
> @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
> */
>
Thomas Poindessous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> I still have some display problems with boxes which display over other
> boxes. I'm trying to find it in dbootstrap code, but it's hard.
>
Which version of whiptail are you using ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Here is a small correction (sorry for the 80 cols)
--- main_menu.c Tue Feb 12 22:29:37 2002
+++ /tmp/main_menu.cSun Apr 7 01:13:12 2002
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
*/
next_action = partition_disk;
alternate_action = no_swap;
- bufT
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:50:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: correction for the Installation Manual
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <3B8A33EC.20197.D2
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.25
correction for the Installation Manual:
section: 3.3.1
the ' PC Hardware FAQ' doesn't exist at the given location:
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet-by-
hierarchy/comp/sys/ibm/pc/hardware/systems/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
I seem to have been looking at the wrong kernel-config file; on
double-checking, I find that the "compact" flavor has only SERIAL and
SERIAL_CONSOLE, but *not* SERIAL_NONSTANDARD -- which sounds like what I
need.
I'll try installing the "vanilla" flavor, and see if that solves the
problem.
Julian Armando Mena Zapata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In ...
> Installing Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 For Intel x86
> Chapter 8 Next Steps and Where to Go From Here
>
> I seen it ...
> ==
> Now, compile the kernel: fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0
> kernel_image. The version
In ...
Installing Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 For Intel x86
Chapter 8 Next Steps and Where to Go From Here
I seen it ...
==
Now, compile the kernel: fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0
kernel_image. The version number of ``1.0'' can be
changed at will; this is just a version number
60 matches
Mail list logo
