On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:29:14PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:25:25AM -0500, David Stanaway wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 01:56, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> > > > Here is a small correction (sorry for the 80 cols)
> > > >
> > > > +++ /tmp/main_menu.c Sun Apr 7 01:13:12 2002
> > > > @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
> > > > */
> > > > next_action = partition_disk;
> > > > alternate_action = no_swap;
> > > > - bufT = _("A swap partition is strongly recommended to
> > > > provide virtual memory for your system, yet no swap partitions were
> > >
> > > What about removing the "s" to "no swap partitions" ? (being not native
> > > speaker, I'm not sure, but... )
> >
> > I don't think that is necessary, as you can use more than 1 swap
> > partition.
>
> Yes, but in this case, none (ie, 0) were detected...I think the following is the best phraseology: A swap partition is strongly recommended to provide virtual memory for your system, yet none was detected. Matt
msg18661/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
