Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-24 Thread Justin B Rye
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrot: > On 9/22/19 8:52 PM, Justin B Rye wrote: >>> The origin of the word is Latin. The word is grammatically >>> neutrum, for which the singular is "-um", the plural is "-a". It's >>> not a mess at all. >> >> Etymology does not determine current grammatical behaviour. >

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/22/19 8:52 PM, Justin B Rye wrote: >> The origin of the word is Latin. The word is grammatically >> neutrum, for which the singular is "-um", the plural is "-a". It's >> not a mess at all. > > Etymology does not determine current grammatical behaviour. Official dictionaries do, again, look i

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-22 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Holger Wansing writes: > Hi, > > Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> Justin B Rye writes: >> >> > Holger Wansing wrote: >> >> And they all need to covered here. >> >> Maybe we cannot find a term that works perfectly for all of them, however >> >> having a suitable coverterm for all would be the major

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-22 Thread Justin B Rye
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Justin B Rye wrote: >> There are several related nouns here, which behave differently: >> * "(broadcast) medium/media" (and "meejuh", treated as singular); >> * "item of (removable storage) media/some media"; >> * "(spirit) medium/mediums". >> Frankly it's a

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-22 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/18/19 12:27 AM, Justin B Rye wrote: >> At least this dictionary still considers it "media" plural: > > Yes, and if you can find a case where the patch talks about putting a > singular "media" in the drive, please point that out, because it'll be > a mistake that needs to be fixed. > >> http

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-17 Thread Justin B Rye
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Justin B Rye wrote: >>> But "media" is a plural word, it should be "medium". It's a Latin word. >> >> Like "agenda"? It doesn't matter whether it was plural in Latin; it >> only matters how it behaves in modern English. But as it happens, the >> patch doesn't u

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-17 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/18/19 12:00 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 9/17/19 11:43 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:37:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Using "media" for a singular word just sounds weird for anyone knowing Latin. that's how many promille of the world popula

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-17 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/17/19 11:43 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:37:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Using "media" for a singular word just sounds weird for anyone knowing Latin. that's how many promille of the world population? also: using "handy" as a word for a mobile phone

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:37:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Using "media" for a singular word just sounds weird for anyone knowing > Latin. that's how many promille of the world population? also: using "handy" as a word for a mobile phone sounds weird for anyone knowing English,

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-17 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/15/19 8:50 PM, Justin B Rye wrote: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz I will move back to "installation media" and to Justins review from https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2019/09/msg00082.html But "media" is a plural word, it should be "medium". It's a Latin word. Like "agenda"? It doesn't

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-17 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: > And given that most people were fine with this term in the first run > (except of Ben), and there is no perfect choice in this case anyway, > I will move back to "installation media" and to Justins review from > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2019/09/msg00082.ht

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-15 Thread Justin B Rye
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz >> I will move back to "installation media" and to Justins review from >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2019/09/msg00082.html > > But "media" is a plural word, it should be "medium". It's a Latin word. Like "agenda"? It doesn't matter whether it was plural in Lat

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-15 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/15/19 7:54 AM, Holger Wansing wrote: As far as I can tell "installation media" is the most commonly used term (Eg: RedHat, SUSE, Microsoft, Apple). While it might not be the ideal term, it's worth mentioning that idiosyncratic documentation may also have a "risk" of this kind. My vote is f

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-15 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Am Sonntag, 15. September 2019 schrieb David: > On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 15:54, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > > > The corresponding patch is attached. > > I will apply it shortly. > > Hi, > > For the benefit of a new contributor who would > like to be more helpful to this team in future, > ca

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-15 Thread David
On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 15:54, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > The corresponding patch is attached. > I will apply it shortly. Hi, For the benefit of a new contributor who would like to be more helpful to this team in future, can you please advise: 1) where can be the master files be found. 2) what c

Re: Change templates: CD -> installation medium - final patch

2019-09-14 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Justin B Rye writes: > > > Holger Wansing wrote: > >> And they all need to covered here. > >> Maybe we cannot find a term that works perfectly for all of them, however > >> having a suitable coverterm for all would be the major goal. > > > > Contenders so far: >