Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:08:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Sorry, I got lost in this discussion. Will we have non-conflicting -dev > > packages, or should I put nano-bf in incoming again? > Please upload So still conflicting -dev packages? Oh well... Packages moved to incoming again. Jo

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 07:32:47AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > No, we are talking about slang1-utf8-dev vs. slang1-dev. Both are needed > > to the same time *to build* dbootstrap. > > Sorry, I got lost in this discussion. Will we have

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 07:32:47AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > No, we are talking about slang1-utf8-dev vs. slang1-dev. Both are needed > to the same time *to build* dbootstrap. Sorry, I got lost in this discussion. Will we have non-conflicting -dev packages, or should I put nano-bf in incoming

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > I see. I did already wonder how mutt links against the new utf8 libs. > Okay, my mistake. Assuming you are right, we have needed library packages. But: > > loadtrm ../libfdisk/libfdisk.a -lnewt -lslang > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libslang.so.

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Fri Feb 22, 2002 um 07:38:51PM: > -lslang and -lnewt looks for > libslang.so and libnewt.so, unless -static is given, and > creates a ELF executable that has a symbol requesting the soname > that libslang.so and libnewt.so gives. I see. I did already wonder ho

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:20:21 +0100 Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not think so if I see "-lslang -lnewt" while building dbootstrap. > Can anyone tell the ultimative truth? > -lslang and -lnewt looks for libslang.so and libnewt.so, unless -static is given, and creates a ELF exe

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Fri Feb 22, 2002 um 04:00:56PM: > > be reduced correctly. My recent impression was, that mklibs.py looks in > > the local directory first, then in the systemwide directory. If this is > > correct, we could just copy the needed pic-lib to the build directory. > >

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

> > > > However, one must make very sure that > > > > -DUTF8, and -lslang / -lslang-utf8 matches. > > > > > > Sounds okay, but you surely meant libslang-utf8.a and libslang.a > > > > > > > er... I didn't. > > Ah, we are talking about -pic ? > > No, we are talking about slang1-utf8-dev vs. sla

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Fri Feb 22, 2002 um 12:55:07AM: > Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > > > /usr/lib/libslang-utf8.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1-UTF8 > > > /usr/lib/libslang.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1 > > > /usr/include/slang.h (with no error checking) > > > > >

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:14:46 +0100 Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #include > Junichi Uekawa wrote on Thu Feb 21, 2002 um 05:48:04PM: > > > It is actually easy to make a libslang-bf-dev or something, that contains: > > > > /usr/lib/libslang-utf8.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1-UTF8 > > /usr

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > /usr/lib/libslang-utf8.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1-UTF8 > > /usr/lib/libslang.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1 > > /usr/include/slang.h (with no error checking) > > > > which would allow for such build to happen. > > > > However, one must make ve

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Thu Feb 21, 2002 um 05:48:04PM: > It is actually easy to make a libslang-bf-dev or something, that contains: > > /usr/lib/libslang-utf8.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1-UTF8 > /usr/lib/libslang.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1 > /usr/include/slang.h (with no error checking) >

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:17:20 +0100 Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just realized that this won't work. We will need both versions > installed to the same time to build boot-floppies. Any ideas about a > possible solution for the dilemma? > It is actually easy to make a libslang-bf-d

Re: Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Sun Feb 17, 2002 um 06:59:06AM: > > non-utf8 versions of dbootstrap now? The -dev packages seem to conflict. > > The only way I see is to fetch one of them, extract localy and modify > > the patchs from Makefiles. Any better idea? > > Did we really need the two

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

Hello, On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 02:30:39PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > I've already asked for nano-utf8 package, but it has not > > > appeared yet, it seems. Junichi, I think we've talked about this a few times on IRC, I think you knew what my plans were. > > I tried to extend the current

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Eduard Bloch wrote on Sun Feb 17, 2002 um 01:44:55PM: > > I've already asked for nano-utf8 package, but it has not > > appeared yet, it seems. > > I tried to extend the current nano package, but is a mess. See recent > slang1-utf8-dev bug report. Okay, I repackaged nano from scratch,

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Sun Feb 17, 2002 um 09:42:48PM: > > What is to do? Create nano-utf8 package, or fix library reduction? > > First option sounds better for me. > > I've already asked for nano-utf8 package, but it has not > appeared yet, it seems. I tried to extend the current n

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > Okay, I tried to make some changes in the Makefiles in EXTRACT lists. > Result: we really need an -utf8 version of programs that need > libslang. Otherwise, library compression seems to screw up the > libslang.so.1 library. libslang.so.1-U

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Sun Feb 17, 2002 um 06:59:06AM: > > The only way I see is to fetch one of them, extract localy and modify > > the patchs from Makefiles. Any better idea? > > Did we really need the two versions ? > My impression was that we used -utf packages in both > packages,

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > With the introduction of slang1a-utf8, > > boot-floppies needs to be modified to compile/run with the new slang. > > Okay, nice work, but how should we be able to compile both, utf8 and > non-utf8 versions of dbootstrap now? The -dev p

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

#include Junichi Uekawa wrote on Fri Feb 15, 2002 um 04:51:45PM: > With the introduction of slang1a-utf8, > boot-floppies needs to be modified to compile/run with the new slang. Okay, nice work, but how should we be able to compile both, utf8 and non-utf8 versions of dbootstrap now? The -dev p

Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8

Package: boot-floppies Severity: serious With the introduction of slang1a-utf8, boot-floppies needs to be modified to compile/run with the new slang. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".