#include <hallo.h> Junichi Uekawa wrote on Sun Feb 17, 2002 um 06:59:06AM:
> > The only way I see is to fetch one of them, extract localy and modify > > the patchs from Makefiles. Any better idea? > > Did we really need the two versions ? > My impression was that we used -utf packages in both > packages, unlesss localized b-f was to be built, which > we won't. Okay, I tried to make some changes in the Makefiles in EXTRACT lists. Result: we really need an -utf8 version of programs that need libslang. Otherwise, library compression seems to screw up the libslang.so.1 library. libslang.so.1-UTF8.4.4 is okay, libslang.so.1 is apparently a dummy, size: 1064 bytes. What is to do? Create nano-utf8 package, or fix library reduction? First option sounds better for me. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- "Das hat Methode. Nur die Ahnungslosen haben genuegend Zeit, sich in Meetings zu profilieren und Karriere zu machen. Die anderen haben tags- ueber genug zu tun und keine Zeit fuer Schwallmeetings." [Holger Marzen] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
