> > > > However, one must make very sure that
> > > > -DUTF8, and -lslang / -lslang-utf8 matches.
> > >
> > > Sounds okay, but you surely meant libslang-utf8.a and libslang.a
> > >
> >
> > er... I didn't.
> > Ah, we are talking about -pic ?
>
> No, we are talking about slang1-utf8-dev vs. slang1-dev. Both are needed
> to the same time *to build* dbootstrap. I am not sure about library
> reduction, does it care about SONAMEs and possible namespace conflicts?
> If it does, -pic packages should also not conflict. When we have the
> complete series of defaut and -utf8 applications, the whole thing will
> be reduced correctly. My recent impression was, that mklibs.py looks in
> the local directory first, then in the systemwide directory. If this is
> correct, we could just copy the needed pic-lib to the build directory.
Note that, if we are talking about lib reduction, and shared library,
we are not talking about libslang.a.
We are talking about libslang-pic.a, and libslang-utf8-pic.a, and
libslang.so symlink pointing to the appropriate slang lib.
We don't really need the static library, static library is for building
the static library with.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
