[Adam DiCarlo]
> Let me know if I got any thing wrong or if you have any problems,
> I'm on #debian-boot.
Could you change the log script to include the output from 'diff -u'
for each commit. This would give us at least minimum core review.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Ok, the following source packages now use the srcpackage_cvs facility
at packages.qa.debian.org:
debian-installer (virtual for all the stuff under debian-installer)
boot-floppies
tasksel
debian-cd
base-config
mklibs
modconf
fai
This lets users subscribe to CVS messages as they de
* Adam DiCarlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-13 11:12]:
> I don't like the idea of a debian-boot-cvs list, because (a) why
> bother when we have PTS, after all, we don't need archives of the list
> to be stored
Not all lists are archived.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Completely agreed. I'm quite interested in following the devel of d-i, but
> if I'm requiered to subscribe to N PTS module, I surely won't do
> that.
No problem, I agree.
> If you're sick with cvs commits on this list, please go for a
> debian-boot-cv
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:26:23PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:37:04PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo écrivait:
> > Oh my. I didn't even realize that debian-installer wasn't a package.
> >
> > Maybe I should burst out the debian-installer/* commits to their
> > actual source p
Le Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:37:04PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo écrivait:
> Oh my. I didn't even realize that debian-installer wasn't a package.
>
> Maybe I should burst out the debian-installer/* commits to their
> actual source packages instead. That sounds like a better plan. The
> only problem there
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:05:10AM +, Colin Watson écrivait:
> > > Everything works automagically, I don't need any override. Anything
> > > sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is automatically forwarded to the subscribers
> > > of entry xx who have the keyw
Le Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:05:10AM +, Colin Watson écrivait:
> > Everything works automagically, I don't need any override. Anything
> > sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is automatically forwarded to the subscribers
> > of entry xx who have the keyword "cvs" enabled.
>
> Oh, I see. What about the vir
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:18:08AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:01:40AM +, Colin Watson ?crivait:
> > Raphael, you'd have to add support for a debian-installer_cvs
> > pseudo-source-package to the PTS manually, I suppose. Would it work?
> > How? What would the web
Le Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:01:40AM +, Colin Watson écrivait:
> Raphael, you'd have to add support for a debian-installer_cvs
> pseudo-source-package to the PTS manually, I suppose. Would it work?
> How? What would the web pages say for it?
Everything works automagically, I don't need any overr
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:01:40AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:10:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > debian-boot-cvs, by analogy with debbugs and www?
> >
> > No -- again, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Managed by
> > the PTS system.
>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:10:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > debian-boot-cvs, by analogy with debbugs and www?
>
> No -- again, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Managed by
> the PTS system.
So ... asking as a BTS admin, where should bug reports for the d-i
package
Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At which list will the discussion go about the CVS commits?
To this list here.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:37:15PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Adam DiCarlo]
> > >> Hmm, would that have all of debian-installer's messages sent to
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or split them up by
> > >> true source package?
> > >
> > > Whichever
* Geert Stappers
| At which list will the discussion go about the CVS commits?
debian-boot would be a good choice; similar to what the web team does
with -www-cvs and -www.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky ab
At 18:38 +0100 12/10/02, Michael Cardenas wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:37:15PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> [Adam DiCarlo]
>> >> Hmm, would that have all of debian-installer's messages sent to
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or split them up by
>> >> true source package?
>> >
>> > Whichever
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:37:15PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam DiCarlo]
> >> Hmm, would that have all of debian-installer's messages sent to
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or split them up by
> >> true source package?
> >
> > Whichever you like.
>
> I would like to have all d-i related com
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:37:15PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam DiCarlo]
> >> Hmm, would that have all of debian-installer's messages sent to
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or split them up by
> >> true source package?
> >
> > Whichever you like.
>
> I would like to have all d-i related com
[Adam DiCarlo]
>> Hmm, would that have all of debian-installer's messages sent to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or split them up by
>> true source package?
>
> Whichever you like.
I would like to have all d-i related commit messages sent to one
mailing list.
I would also like to get the 'diff -u' includ
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > If anyone has any objections to this (I can't imaging why) let me
> > know. Otherwise I'll forward boot-floppies and debian-installer
> > messages to their corresponding PTS source pkg addresses.
>
> Hmm, would that have all of debia
Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> If anyone has any objections to this (I can't imaging why) let me
> know. Otherwise I'll forward boot-floppies and debian-installer
> messages to their corresponding PTS source pkg addresses.
Hmm, would that have all of debian-installer's messages sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], o
We're doing the wrong thing by having CVS commit messages sent to
debian-boot. I'd like to change this in the following manner, quoted
from the Developer's Reference:
4.11.3 Forwarding CVS commits in the PTS
If you use a publicly accessible CVS repository for maintaining your
Debian packag
22 matches
Mail list logo
