On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:10:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > debian-boot-cvs, by analogy with debbugs and www? > > No -- again, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Managed by > the PTS system.
So ... asking as a BTS admin, where should bug reports for the d-i packages be cc'ed? Also installer notifications. It seems strange for them to be cc'ed to anything other than [EMAIL PROTECTED] in this case - after all, the PTS was in large part conceived as a way to get around the fact that the BTS doesn't have any other subscription mechanism (although it broadcasts katie's notifications too). In that case, we would have to start maintaining a source override for every d-i .udeb. But the bug reports should probably still go to debian-boot, so I'm now confused about how this fits into the way the PTS is used elsewhere. Raphael, you'd have to add support for a debian-installer_cvs pseudo-source-package to the PTS manually, I suppose. Would it work? How? What would the web pages say for it? > No mail lists to setup. I'm not sure using the PTS comes out as less work, infrastructurally speaking ... it seems like a mailing list done the hard way. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
