Le Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:37:04PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo écrivait: > Oh my. I didn't even realize that debian-installer wasn't a package. > > Maybe I should burst out the debian-installer/* commits to their > actual source packages instead. That sounds like a better plan. The > only problem there is that if people want all the CVS commit msgs for > debian-installer, they have a few PTS subscriptions to do... > > Thoughts?
That's too complicated just to get the CVS commits. In fact, I don't have a problem with the CVS commits in the list itself. We can always filter them with procmail ... :) The fake package in the PTS is ok for me, as long as it's well documented. A debian-boot-cvs list would be ok for me too. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
