> I hope I did not make too much confusion; the situation is a bit messy
> ATM but almost under control, so it souldn't take too long before we
> finally have a proper set of font for g-i.
As long as we get the ttf-freefont line spacing problem fixed,
yesbut I don't see the light, here...
> I wanted to updated the wiki with the new infor regarding Bengali and
> Hindi, but in order to update the wiki correctly I need to know
which
> font was used in the screenshots you posted.
This is what we currently use:
bn- Bengali (MuktiNarrow_11-08-2005.ttf)
hi- Hindi (Gargi_1.7.ttf
On 2/22/06, Guntupalli Karunakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [4] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/hindi_pre.jpg
> > [5] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/hindi_post.jpg
>
> [5] is rendering fine for Hindi.
Davide,
I wanted to updated the wiki with the new infor regarding Bengali and Hin
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:07:07 +0100
Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [4] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/hindi_pre.jpg
> [5] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/hindi_post.jpg
[5] is rendering fine for Hindi.
Karunakar
--
*
* Work: http://www.
Yes, bengali[3] is perfect. :)
On 2/22/06, salahuddin pasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >bengali: compare [2] with [3]
>
> bengali[3] is perfect
>
> [3] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/bengali_post.jpg
>
>
> -salahuddin66
> www.bengalinux.org
> www.debian.org
>
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 22:07
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 01:52:06AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:08, Davide Viti wrote:
> > Here's what I got when stripping MuktiNarrow:
> ...
> > I got this with ttf-punjabi-fonts.tgz
> ...
> > and this with ttf-devanagari-fonts.tgz
>
> Suggest you file minor bug repo
On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:08, Davide Viti wrote:
> Here's what I got when stripping MuktiNarrow:
...
> I got this with ttf-punjabi-fonts.tgz
...
> and this with ttf-devanagari-fonts.tgz
Suggest you file minor bug reports against the packages these fonts come
from.
pgph50DSjuodD.pgp
Descri
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 05:26:22PM +0200, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > > Gargi_1.7.ttf: u2212 u2219
> > > Saab.ttf: u2212
> >
> > Some weird messages happened during the stripping but let's just
> > move on for now :)
>
> I got the same messages for lohit_* but they worry me. Maybe somebody
> wit hmor
> > Gargi_1.7.ttf: u2212 u2219
> > Saab.ttf: u2212
>
> Some weird messages happened during the stripping but let's just
> move on for now :)
I got the same messages for lohit_* but they worry me. Maybe somebody
wit hmore experience in font work could help? (freefont guys, maybe,
since we might use
On 2/15/06, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also noticed we include
> DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf: 858 glyphs [129360 bytes]
> FreeSansBoldOblique.ttf: 790 glyphs [74588 bytes]
Please note that the coverage for regular/blod/italic fonts is for
many fonts different, so we must make su
> After discussion with Davide on IRC, I have uploaded a new version of
> ttf-freefont in unstable with the following changes:
great
> I'l try to take care of the package as well as possible but I'll
need
> help for that probably as I'm not that deeply competent with
> font-related issues. Someo
> in the specific case of freesans fonts, oblique is slanted, while italic
> is slanted and cursive; with other fonts, i noticed the oblique being
> more slanted than italic, while not cursive.
> We should evaluate how much space it's possible saving up if italic ttf
> files are removed, and als
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 17:05, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Oblique is something even more "pending" than italic and the GTK
What do you mean by pending exactly? Slanted maybe?
Hmm. Are you sure that the oblique fonts are not used instead of italic?
Anyway, I'd like to
Christian Perrier wrote:
Oblique is something even more "pending" than italic and the GTK
frontend never uses oblique formatting, so the *oblique*.ttf files can
also be deleted from font packages right now to save up some Kbytes.
So, you actually mean we could remove the below *Oblique files
Viti,
> bengali: compare [2] with [3]
[3] is way better than [2]. That's a great job!
Regards,
BG
--
Baishampayan Ghose
Free Software Foundation of India
b.ghose at gnu.org.in
> PS: Christian, I noticed that hi.po does not contain the "/Choose language"
> in the msgstr;
> now I understand why it is useful
:-)
I am sure I tracked these down. The error probably came back when a
translator committed a work file he was working on while I was
correcting this mistake.
--
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:07:07PM +0100, Davide Viti wrote: I forgot
to mention that I also uploaded the xml map [1] of the glyphs included
in the ttf files included with the iso.
Columns are:
FreeSansBold.ttf
FreeSansOblique.ttf
FreeSans.ttf
ae_AlMohanad.ttf
ja.ttf
ko.ttf
zh.ttf
MuktiNarrow_11-0
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:07:49PM +0100, Davide Viti wrote:
> This evening I'll put what follows into practice (i.e. new test iso
> image).
just done it: you can grab it from [1]
> 3) It's also possible to strip the following (random) glyphs not
> used in the g-i (there are certainly others):
18 matches
Mail list logo
