Yes, bengali[3] is perfect. :)
On 2/22/06, salahuddin pasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >bengali: compare [2] with [3] > > bengali[3] is perfect > > [3] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/bengali_post.jpg > > > -salahuddin66 > www.bengalinux.org > www.debian.org > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 22:07 +0100, Davide Viti wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:07:49PM +0100, Davide Viti wrote: > > > This evening I'll put what follows into practice (i.e. new test iso > > > image). > > > > just done it: you can grab it from [1] > > > > > 3) It's also possible to strip the following (random) glyphs not > > > used in the g-i (there are certainly others): > > > > > > Mathematical Operators (U+2200-U+22FF) > > > Block Elements (U+2580-U+259F) > > > > > > ae_AlMohanad.ttf: u2202:u2265 > > > > Haven't done this since I've stripped only the tarballs > > > > > DejaVuSans-Bold*.ttf: u2202:u2265 u2580:u259F > > > > actually I meant DejaVuSans*.ttf > > > > > Gargi_1.7.ttf: u2212 u2219 > > > Saab.ttf: u2212 > > > > Some weird messages happened during the stripping but let's just > > move on for now :) > > Here's the stats for usr/share/fonts: > > > > ---- > > FreeSansBold.ttf: 837 glyphs [71964 bytes] > > FreeSansOblique.ttf: 856 glyphs [79056 bytes] > > FreeSans.ttf: 1211 glyphs [93644 bytes] > > ae_AlMohanad.ttf: 446 glyphs [120920 bytes] > > ja.ttf: 733 glyphs [146236 bytes] > > ko.ttf: 701 glyphs [119164 bytes] > > zh.ttf: 1814 glyphs [1176716 bytes] > > MuktiNarrow_11-08-2005.ttf: 197 glyphs [84556 bytes] > > DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf: 822 glyphs [99084 bytes] > > DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf: 823 glyphs [105052 bytes] > > DejaVuSans.ttf: 822 glyphs [108252 bytes] > > Gargi_1.7.ttf: 236 glyphs [74116 bytes] > > Saab.ttf: 137 glyphs [105492 bytes] > > > > Font files: 13 > > Total size: 2384252 bytes > > Unique Glyphs: 4565 > > Bytes per glyph: 522 > > > > Generating unicode map file... > > > > ---- > > > > The size of mini.iso went from 10674176 bytes to 9512960 bytes > > I took some screenshoots using Attilio's tool and to me looks > > like things changed the right way: I'd like to hear from native > > speakers. > > > > bengali: compare [2] with [3] > > hindi: compare [4] with [5] > > punjabi: compare [6] with [7] > > > > I removed only BoldOblique. Let's say this was a minimal cleanup without > > risks. Obviously we can strip alot more but we can't expect to gain alot > > more space: > > the iso containing _only_ nazli is 8185856 bytes, so I guess we can use > > that as lower > > limit... > > > > If you want to avoid going through the all process of stripping the fonts, > > you can get > > a tarball [8] with all the stripped tarballs (it's recursive :)) > > > > regards, > > Davide > > > > PS: Christian, I noticed that hi.po does not contain the "/Choose language" > > in the msgstr; > > now I understand why it is useful > > > > [1] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/g-i/mini_20060215.iso > > > > [2] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/bengali_pre.jpg > > [3] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/bengali_post.jpg > > > > [4] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/hindi_pre.jpg > > [5] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/hindi_post.jpg > > > > [6] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/punjabi_pre.jpg > > [7] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/shots/punjabi_post.jpg > > > > [8] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/gi-fonts_0.1.tgz > > _______________________________________________ > > Debian-in-workers mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-in-workers > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQBD+3fwSIRCZMpPW8oRAgvvAJ4+FE7UGiBS3kH8ZUEILVaj6mr+AwCdFFK6 > xKka4ADEHZvLPQb5n1CUf8A= > =6uke > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Debian-in-workers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-in-workers > > >
