on my SSD, and had two lockups in 24 hours.
> No lockups since turning it off, so I don't consider it safe yet at all.
>
> The man page seems to indicate it is very much in the testing phase at
> this point.
I guess it's got stabilised in the later kernels, could you try it ag
pen a console where I did the following:
# chroot /target
# update-grub
inspected the /boot/grub/grub.cfg file
# grub-install /dev/sda
# ^D
# exit
Then I chose to continue without bootloader and it rebooted fine in
the installed system.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot
On 08/20/2011 02:21 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
>> Package: task-file-server
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
>
>
> Committed.
Thanks.
> W
Package: task-file-server
Severity: normal
Hi
smbfs will be removed. Please recommend cifs-utils instead.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
nges are not
> going to happen at once but in a progressive process and at the end
> this is going to make the installer release process easier to
> understand and handle.
Right, lets go for it!
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
itrd and puts this
> information in the Built-Using field of the binary package.
>
> Comments, welcome :-)
Great start, though Built-Using expects source packages instead of
binary (or udeb) packages.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
the daily or weekly d-i images.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110720175803.7316.97446.report...@station.luk.local
tags 621193 + patch
tags 621193 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for discover (versioned as 2.1.2-5.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers
Luk
diff -u discover-2.1.2/debian/changelog discover-2.1.2/debian/chan
on't be pushed through -updates, no? Normal updates are included into
> stable through point releases.
AFAICT -updates should be used when changes should be pushed to users
right now aka even before a point release.
So all in -updates would be included in the point release together with
ot
one to
> document the current autobuilder setup, so that it would become
> possible for others to investigate the cause for this and to add the
> relevant logs to the overview page. AFAIK currently only Luk knows
> how this works and it's not documented anywhere... (Luk, could yo
o existing documentation or scripts driving this
>> process.
>
>
> Luk Claes has been the person setting this up on the buildds. So, I
> think having him in the loop is the best action. Luk?
The mips* buildds were changed, the promess was made to have the d-i
builds moving to th
On 08/21/2010 10:40 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 08/21/2010 05:41 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
>>
>>> busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an
>>> incompatibility with the netcfg version currently i
would also have to migrate
>> at the same time.
>
> ack for netcfg and libdebian-installer.
What about partman-base (and rescue which Christian kind of acked)?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c7039bc.30...@debian.org
icu
>
> It doesn't indeed.
>
>> so should be safe to unblock in that regard; could we do so please?
>
> Brltty should be fine to unblock.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu
ed qtparted directly, and
> file bugs with patches as necessary for the others.
Please do hold your upload for now. We'll come back to you when the
moment is right.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b9bd991.3020...@debian.org
>> needs fixing or not.
>
> I think it is not worth. syslog now has the gotten IP each time it
> runs so is easy to spot if it has been run twice.
With dhcp3 not all the leases in the file are valid aka only the latest
one for every IP is valid if it's not expired yet. I'm not sure if udhcp
would cope with invalid leases in the leases file?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
did not, though our tools failed to output that this was the culprit.
> Please also unblock partman-md/49. It fixes a broken dialog when removing
> RAID devices.
hint added.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
hing is copied over to testing autobuilding is
>> automatically stopped, which might be another bug of its own.
>
> So, what can be done to fix the current breakage?
Have tomboy (and mono) migrate to testing so meta-gnome2 can migrate to
testing.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
hat lenny-support *must* also migrate before the release (but
> not necessarily before an upload of debian-installer).
Known and unblocked already.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> please unblock pciutils 1:3.1.4-3 (udeb)
Not blocked, so no unblock needed.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
vio was mostly alone to be online at the
> meeting time.
>
> Please accept apologies for this.
>
> I'll not be available next Monday (nor will Luk probably as he's
> planned to be in Paris and we'll have the french version of
> beersigning with a few others, som
s and mipsel there's a much bigger problem: there have not been any
> builds at all since early July. It looks as if some of the central D-I
> buildds are simply not being managed.
Wrong, ssh is/was broken on mips* so the results did not get uploaded,
but the builds were not interrup
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Changes:
> libpng (1.2.40-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release
>
> Changes:
> pciutils (1:3.1.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Update pci.ids with snapshot dated 2009-09-18 03:15:01
Both are not bl
Looks like a sane plan to me.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
introducing new problems.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
s outside the
main archive. Currently only the source package atari-bootstrap is in
unstable...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
oting you could do that by pressing 'e' (for edit
on the line with the bigmem kernel) and afterwards pressing 'b' (for
boot) while in the grub menu (to just try it) or updating
/boot/grub/menu.lst (for the bigmem kernel) and running update-grub
before rebooting into the bigmem ker
dann frazier wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>> - Update kernel-wedge/stable to include bnx2x if available (are there
>>>> space issues here?)
>>> The space usage is neglitable and I think
t care about lenny any more?
FTP Masters: is it possible to fix this without a point release? If so
what can we do to help in fixing it?
Note that for the squeeze tasksel overrides, the unstable ones could be
used for the moment.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@l
7;ve
> changed kernel-wedge a lot during the 2.6.30 migration and it is not
> suitable for the lenny usage.
What's the status here?
>> - Update d-i in 5.0.3 to incorporate this driver
>
> Yes, you got the picture right.
>
> I offer help if required.
This can pr
.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
unstable 9 days.
please consider unblocking simple-cdd 0.3.11.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
is 20:00 UTC)?
Sorry for the late reply.
Most of us are at Debcamp and dinner is served at 20:30 UTC, so I guess
another hour would be better.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Andrew Pollock (18/07/2009):
I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that
necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security
fix for CVE-2009-0692
Y
ng subject.)
And yes, udeb-generating are always frozen.
For the moment, it's supposed to change in the future though.
Anyway, unblocked after ack from Otavio.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> martin f krafft writes:
>
>> Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
>
> Ack
Already unblocked since May 26th ...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
vel compatibility is 7
>>> * Fix out-of-date-standards-version
>>> * Fix dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
>> ping
>
> Ack
both unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
at time.
>> debian-boot, please approve, this is blocked due to a udeb.
>
> Ack!
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting
>> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability
>> of the kernel team...
>
> it
g issues solved soon after it would be forced in.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looks like vte can be migrated to testing. Unblocking it will allow 3
> other packages to immediately migrate too and in time, 5 more packages.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
this, in order to make sure that console-setup
> will not become a blocker of the migration of the new X from unstable to
> testing it will be good to move the current unstable console-setup to
> testing before I upload a new package in unstable.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBS
Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would it be acceptable to allow nano into testing finally? It has been
> waiting for 84 days for the maintainer to request migration to testing.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Luk,
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to
>> either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise.
>
> Yeah, binNMU ought to
introducing new problems.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
)
are noteworthy AFAIK.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
il was
rather busy up to now (and I expect that to continue for some time
still), so the point release will be delayed for at least a week.
Hopefully we will be able to do the point release next Saturday, I hope
Phil or some of our Release Assistants can confirm that soon.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNS
n
> the used mirror :(
>
> RM team,
>
> Is there a way to update the installer in case?
If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to
either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise.
The resulting package will be in oldstable-propos
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Luk,
Hi Otavio
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Attached is a first try to support udhcpc in netcfg.
>
> Thank you very much by working on it.
>
>> I opted for dropping support for pump and the ISC dhcp clie
(debian-installer 20070308etch5).
> Hopefully this can be sorted out before 5.0.2 goes out.
As it is in proposed-updates it should make it to 5.0.2 without problems.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
clude an updated
> lkdi-s390, which would make the fix for #511334 available at install
> time.
As coordinated on IRC, it's fine to include the cdebconf and above linux
fix as well as the d-i respin as long as it is all uploaded, reviewed
and accepted at least one week before the actual p
h yet except for compilation errors.
Please do test it and come back to me, any feedback appreciated!
Cheers
Luk
Index: dhcp.c
===
--- dhcp.c (revision 58745)
+++ dhcp.c (working copy)
@@ -23,10 +23,8 @@
#define DHCP_OPTION_LEN
Hi
Forwarding this announcement as it might directly affect your team.
Don't hesitate to forward it further if you think that can be useful.
Cheers
Luk
Original Message
Subject: Upcoming Lenny Point Release
Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:25:12 + (UTC)
Resent
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock rdate 1:1.2-1 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock libpng 1.2.36-1 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock pciutils 1:3.1.2-4 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
please approve and unblock xfsprogs 3.0.2 (udeb)
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
martin f krafft wrote:
> ... has been in testing for 20 days. Should not affect d-i.
unblocked
cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
> The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to
> unblock them?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.de
w problems, and
> includes several updated translations, new manpages, updated manpages,
> and updated documentation.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi
There were some commits related to this AFAIR, though it's unclear what
the exact status is.
Is it time to start testing or are there still some issues left?
What's the next step that needs to be taken?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.
e likely porter
> help will be needed.
The problem is known and is being investigated by the hppa porters AFAIK.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
pportunity for finishing off this transition.
Please go ahead. Fixing it before the first beta release is still needed
though.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
eported, it closes a couple bugs, and has been
> in unstable 10 days.
>
> please consider unblocking simple-cdd 0.3.10.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-7 please?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
Please let migrate eject/2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-6 to testing.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
* sarge-support
* vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)?
* sysconfig-writer
* linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6
* linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6
Can these safely be removed from the repository?
None of these should be removed.
The *only* one
-2.6
Can these safely be removed from the repository?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please let gtk+ 2.16 go into testing. It is blocking, among other
> things, the gnome-desktop transition.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
de 1000, failing early in
> the boot process:
I guess you found the culprit in the mean time (bad config for the 64bit
kernel)?
Cheers
Luk
> Rebooting with command: boot
> Boot device: disk File and args:
> SILO Version 1.4.13
> boot:
> Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 f
et.
>
> If there an expected time of arrival for this?
These are reactivated in the mean time.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ecome root using the "sudo
>>> command.
>> And "the root account will be disabled" is useful information.
>>
>> All that's left is: mind the quotes round "sudo"!
>
> OK. So, Luk, this is the final proposal we come up with:
>
> Th
Hi
Below is the change to the user-setup-udeb templates I intend to commit,
please review it.
Cheers
Luk
--- debian/user-setup-udeb.templates(revision 57747)
+++ debian/user-setup-udeb.templates(working copy)
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@
A good password will contain a mixture of letters
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:38:39PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Luk and Wouter,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I've prepared powerpc dailies on one of the buildds, so please tell m
Luk Claes wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Jérémy pointed me to this outstanding issue, so I had a look...
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:00:45 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 12:42:44AM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I know that adding another question at high priority might not be
a
sitories or if you want to keep providing the
dailies yourself for now.
The plan is to build all dailies on the buildds and have them all end up
on d-i.debian.org eventually...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Wartan
You updated the powerpc build config for adding a CHRP boot structure on
ISO images [1]. Though when trying to build images, it doesn't find the
bootinfo.txt, where should it come from?
Cheers
Luk
[1]
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i/trunk/installer/build/config/powerpc.cfg?r1=
with the media from right
after the release should (for some?) still be possible.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
he
>> rules for udeb migration could be relaxed for a while, given the
>> expected amount of updates.
>
> ATM they're really relaxed; more to the end of mounth they should
> be more restrict again since we'll probably be working at alpha1
> images
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please accept beep to transition to testing. It is mostly only a
> translation and cosmetic update, no code changes involved. For your
> convenience, here's the changelog:
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Official events have to be submitted in the Pentabarf interface before
>> Wednesday if I'm not mistaken.
>>
>> Would it be ok if I submit D-I Work Sessions for du
t
all works, how people can help and why it's a cool project to work on?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Having regular meetings allow us to have short ones; I think 1h30min is
>> enough. Specially after those that we're doing to organize things I do
>> believe they'll be able to be shorter.
>
>
> So, meeting every 1st and 3rd Monday of the month at 20:00UTC?
Woul
Mark Brown wrote:
> Please consider zlib for migration to testing, it has been in unstable
> for quite some time and contains only one very small change:
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> * put all *-2.6.26-2-* kernel and module udebs in testing, REPLACING
>> THEIR 2.6.26-1 COUNTERPARTS.
* remove the arm kernel and module packages again from unstable/testing.
Cheers
luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debia
Davide Viti wrote:
> Hi,
> please allow current ttf-dejavu (2.29-2) into testing.
> It contains a couple of udebs.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
There is a problem with the dak code for oldstable point releases. Joerg
is fixing it atm.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
w problems, and
> includes several updated translations.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing?
>
> It fixes a security issue.
>
> It has a udeb.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
>
>>> Improve udeb migration
>>> --
>>> The release team is working on a migration script which, among other
>>> tasks, will implement dedicated features for udeb migra
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>> On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>> It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is
>>>> nonsense.
>>> No thanks. I see no rea
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is
>> nonsense.
>
> No thanks. I see no reason why _I_ should make that effort.
Please stop that hostility.
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
ter many discussions about various ways to take some load
> out of the RM shoulders, we settled on an organization where Otavio
> Salvador keeps working as D-I release manager, with some assistance
> during the release preparations:
> - Christian Perrier for "all boring and tedio
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-6 please?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
unblocked
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> freetype 2.3.9-4 is ready to go into testing, but it includes a udeb.
> debian-boot, is this ok to update?
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
us, it would save *your* time to work on release management..:-)
>>
>> (ref: last team meeting...)
>
> Yes, that would be nice but someone needs to show interest on it.
I would be happy to help out, though would prefer a team effort, what do
you think?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes:
>
>> Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>>> Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
>>> less up-to-date status of the preparations.
>> The installer team
-master: There will very probably propagations to squeeze as well as
sid be necessary, are we sure it works?
Please let us know if you see any issues and lets try to make it good
point releases!
Cheers
Luk
[0] http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/oldstable.html
[1] http://release.debian.org
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo