maximilian attems wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting >> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability >> of the kernel team... > > it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep, > that funnily surfaced now on i686. fixed in latest repo and > scheduled for upload latest on this upcoming week. > >>> Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and >>> release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to >>> happen? >> There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such >> situations as there is no clear plan of the kernel team to get the >> remaining issues solved soon after it would be forced in. > > without force hints linux-2.6 goes nowhere.
If you mean this in general then you are misinformed. If you mean atm, then you know the answer to your following question. > what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about? The ones that prevent linux-2.6 from migrating once it would be unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
