Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
* sarge-support
* vmelilo-installer (also from unstable)?
* sysconfig-writer
* linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6
* linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6
Can these safely be removed from the repository?
None of these should be removed.
The *only* one which could possibly be discussed in this list is
sarge-support.
That's one.
>On Saturday 02 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > On Saturday 02 May 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> > > * linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6
>
> This one actually could be removed.
That's two.
Why would removal from the modules package be ok and not removal from
the kernel package or the bootloader installer btw? What's special with
the modules package?
>On Saturday 02 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> >On Saturday 02 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 12:38:47PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> > > I had a first look at cleaning up some code, first step being
removal
> >> > > of packages from the repository that seem to not be used in the
> >> > > official archive anymore:
> > >
> > > Since when is d-i restricted to architectures in the main debian
> > > archive? This decision belongs to the m68k people.
>
> Hmm? So m68k porters should decide on s390's sysconfig-writer [1]? ;-)
>
> I fully agree with your statement though.
So what about the modules package in that case?
> [1] Which is only included in the list because it looks like Luk was
somewhat sloppy when checking whether "a package is in the archive".
Not at all, that package is not in the archive, some people where sloppy
with not renaming the directory name in the repository apparently. Would
it be fine for me to rename the directory?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
