Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.107+reform1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm running "update-initramfs -c -k all" with a /boot that has newer
initrd than the installed kernel. This will result in:
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.12.6-mnt-reform-arm64
Using DTB: freescale/imx8mq-mnt-refo
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.138
Severity: important
Hi,
apt 2.9.19 in unstable does not depend on gpgv anymore (except on alpha,
hppa, ia64, m68k, sh4, x32) and instead uses sqv on most architectures.
This means that when running debootstrap to create a Debian chroot, one
now gets this:
$
Package: partman-auto-raid
Version: 51
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i patch
Dear Maintainer,
I was trying to get a preseeded Debian installation to create a md software
RAID array with superblock version 1.0. To do that, one has to issue `mdadm
--create ... --metadata=1.0 ...` at array creation time.
Hi,
Quoting Diederik de Haas (2024-10-19 21:08:37)
> > All existing arm* recipes always created a separated ext2 /boot partition,
> > so I kept it in the new arm64 recipes. If this is not needed, the arm64
> > recipes can be changed so that they create a separate /boot partition only
> > when part
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:00:36 +0200 Holger Wansing wrote:
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > 16 MB (~15.3 MiB) or 16 MiB (~16.8 MB) ?
> > In partman, 1 MB really means 10^6 bytes, not 1 MiB (2^20 bytes).
>
> I think I've actually tried both and IIRC that didn't make a difference.
for the MNT Reform we
Hi,
On 2024-01-31 09:15, Ken Sharp wrote:
Do I need to submit the patch somewhere else or is this the correct
place?
the bts is the correct place but debootstrap is maintained by unpaid
volunteers like many other open source projects. So getting your patch
merged depends on somebody finding
Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-30 21:53:59)
> El 30/10/23 a las 21:16, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues escribió:
> > Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40)
> >> We can do an upload, but note that it won't have any effect on package
> >> builds, given
Hi,
Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40)
> We can do an upload, but note that it won't have any effect on package
> builds, given the buildds use stable/oldstable
actually we forgot something here. The upload *does* have an effect on buildds
right now even before Trixie gets released becau
Hi Luca,
Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:38:16)
> Thanks - I'll merge and do an upload over the weekend then
thank you for your upload!! :D
I temporarily subscribed to debootstrap via tracker.d.o so that I hopefully
catch any bug report coming in related to this change.
I also re-triggered
Hi Luca,
Quoting Luca Boccassi (2023-10-18 19:17:40)
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 18:04, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-12 17:56:04)
> > > Johannes has asked the RMs in this thread:
> > >
&g
Hi,
Quoting Santiago Vila (2023-10-12 17:56:04)
> Johannes has asked the RMs in this thread:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/10/msg00425.html
>
> if they are ready to consider the bugs as RC. I believe it would be better
> if we can make the bugs "factual
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 12:29:13 +0200 Pascal Hambourg
wrote:
> Sorry to insist, but IMO this issue should really be worked out. I once
> suggested the following simple formula :
>
> max swap size = min(RAM size, disk space * R)
>
> with R being a ratio between 0 and 100% to be defined.
>
Hi Julien,
thank you for your quick reply!
Quoting Julien Cristau (2023-09-28 17:49:51)
> I guess more than mixing two different things I disagree that that is
> debootstrap's responsibility, and so I disagree that that is a valid bug. In
> my view it's more important for debootstrap to reliably
The remaining bugs are now properly user-tagged and can be found here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian...@lists.debian.org;tag=missing-build-depends-on-not-build-essential
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 20:13:45 +0200 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Santiago is in
Hi all,
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 06:01:13 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-24 20:23:25)
> > Julien Cristau (2016-09-12):
> > > This is a transient situation because some Essential packages'
> > > dependencies changed. I'd consi
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:09:00 +0800 Han Gao wrote:
> Fix loong64 usrmerge recognize.
thank you for your patch but the function you changed is no longer used to
create the merged-/usr symlinks. The new approach creates those symlinks after
unpacking the essential packages and no longer carri
Hi,
Quoting Simon McVittie (2023-08-16 17:19:42)
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 17:07:39 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > The other aspect is that we want to ship the
> > aliasing symlinks in a package (base-files probably).
> ...
> > Is there any prerequisite you see missing before we can merge and uplo
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
Quoting Antonio Terceiro (2023-05-16 22:30:02)
> Maybe I am missing something, but debootstrap has no knowledge about
> auto-apt-proxy,
it does:
https://sources.debian.org/src/debootstrap/1.0.128%2Bnmu2/debootstrap/#L457
> why would debootstrap be the one responsibl
Hi,
Quoting Isaac True (2023-04-17 10:49:20)
> > Why would you have to run flash-kernel again?
>
> When it's being initially installed it won't have the additional command line
> flag that forces it to ignore the EFI check, so it won't run and you would
> have to run it manually afterwards with t
Control: tag -1 + patch
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:52:45 + Isaac True wrote:
> As part of our CI/CD system, we are building images for target devices. The
> images are set up in virtual machines which boot using EFI, but flash-kernel
> installation always fails as it detects that the system
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.128+nmu2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Control: affects -1 + mmdebstrap
Hi,
steps to reproduce:
runuser -u debci -- mmdebstrap --variant=custom --mode=unshare
--setup-hook='container=lxc debootstrap unstable "$1"' - chroot.tar
Run this inside a privileged docke
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.128+nmu2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: terce...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 auto-apt-proxy mmdebstrap
Hi,
currently the mmdebstrap autopkgtest in experimental fails because debootstrap
cannot be run with the user namespace unshared if auto-apt-proxy is instal
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:37:13 +0200 Pascal Hambourg
wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:33:28 + Martin wrote:
> > Also I assume, that desktop PCs are more oftenly installed
> > relying on d-i defaults, while servers are typically installed
> > by experienced admins.
>
> I agree and am afraid
Hi Phil,
Quoting Philip Hands (2022-05-13 11:52:05)
> Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
> > I'm confused. Shouldn't preseed_fetch try to obtain the setup-testbed
> > relative to the preseed file it just obtained?
>
> preseed_fetch gets things rel
Hi Diederik,
thank you for notifying me of this bug report over at #1010878.
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 15:53:22 +0200 Jonathan Leroy - Inikup
wrote:
> This bug is still present in Buster.
> Very simple workaround:
>
> d-i preseed/early_command string echo "$(debconf-get preseed/url)" >
> /var/run/pr
Hi Phil,
Quoting Philip Hands (2022-05-12 13:40:51)
> BTW I somehow failed to notice that you were pointing preseed/url at the
> example-preseed.cfg when I ran that locally.
>
> Given that you're already relying on a network preseed, you should just
> put a copy of that somewhere you control, and
Hi,
Quoting Philip Hands (2022-05-12 10:14:46)
> > So for some reason passwd/root-password-again is ignored. Above recipe
> > works fine for other architectures and for some reason stops with above
> > prompt on mips64el. Why?
>
> It seems that you are hitting a limit on the length of the command
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org
Hi,
steps to reproduce:
qemu-img create -f qcow2 disk.qcow 4G
curl
https://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/installer-mips64el/current/images/malta/netboot/initrd.gz
> initrd.gz
curl
https://deb.debian.org/
.126+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Undo the changes of the last upload. (Closes: #998867)
+
+ -- Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:38:15 +0100
+
debootstrap (1.0.126) unstable; urgency=low
* Ensure bookworm+ suites are set up with m
Control: affects -1 mmdebstrap
Hi,
Quoting Dimitri John Ledkov (2021-11-15 14:54:36)
> > Please point out what you plan to do about this change in debootstrap so
> > that I can adapt the mmdebstrap autopkgtest accordingly.
>
> I did notice the mmdebstrap autopkgtest regression. [...]
this bug h
Quoting Julien Cristau (2021-11-09 09:33:14)
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 07:49:03AM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> wrote:
> > since 1.0.126 the --no-merged-usr option became a no-op if for any code
> > name but
> > etch*|lenny|squeeze|wheezy|jessie*|stretch|ascii
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.126
Severity: important
Hi,
since 1.0.126 the --no-merged-usr option became a no-op if for any code
name but
etch*|lenny|squeeze|wheezy|jessie*|stretch|ascii|buster|beowulf|bullseye
This means that I cannot create a Debian chroot from Debian unstable
from 10 yea
Package: debian-installer
Version: 11.0.0
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: johannes.dr...@nfon.com
Dear maintainer,
using the expert installer console (non-GUI) results in a loop at stage
'Configure package manager'. At this point a valid custom mirror was
already given and accepted (prior to 'u
Hi,
Quoting Holger Levsen (2021-04-09 10:34:53)
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:20:42AM +0300, ValdikSS wrote:
> > 1. To speed up base system install (the first installation step),
> > debootstrap should be improved to use libeatmydata for internal dpkg call.
> > [...]
>
> or maybe mmdebstrap could
Same issue here on HP Envy x360 cn1002ng with Intel WiFi-AC 9560.
Similar to other reports, neither approach of providing different
versions of the requested drivers works.
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.121
Severity: normal
Hi,
steps to reproduce:
$ sudo debootstrap --variant=buildd unstable debian-unstable
The resulting chroot will include the package libgcc1 *and* libgcc-s1.
The former is useless because the latter provides the former.
Thanks!
cheers, josc
Hi,
Quoting Tianon Gravi (2020-03-13 08:05:11)
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 18:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > The latest batch of bug reports filed by Johannes 'josch' Schauer seems
> > to confirm my initial assessment: this will break (too) many use cases
> > (#95
Hi,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2020-03-09 06:47:49)
> Johannes 'josch' Schauer (2020-03-09):
> > Package: debootstrap
> > Version: 1.0.120
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > steps to re
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.121
Severity: normal
Hi,
the autopkgtest of debuerreotype fails because debootstrap attempts to
run "apt-get update". See this log for details:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/d/debuerreotype/4521193/log.gz
E: Release file for
http://snapsh
Control: block 953592 by -1
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 23:04:03 +0100 Johannes 'josch' Schauer
wrote:
> recent debootstrap fails silently if the given mirror does not contain
> translations.
this breaks the autopkgtest of mmdebstrap, thus adding the blocking bug.
It seems that
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.121
Severity: normal
Hi,
when I debootstrap a stable release from snapshot.d.o, the security
mirror gets added to the sources.list and an upgrade is performed. There
is no option to prevent this from happening. This means that I cannot
anymore create a chroot of
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.121
Severity: normal
Hi,
the --keyring and --no-check-gpg options do not seem to be passed on to
"apt-get update". When I try to debootstrap with these options I get in
my debootstrap.log:
Ign:1 http://127.0.0.1:8000/debian stable InRelease
Hit:2 http://127.0.0.
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.121
Severity: normal
Hi,
recent debootstrap fails silently if the given mirror does not contain
translations. From debootstrap.log:
Ign:1 http://127.0.0.1/debian stable InRelease
Hit:2 http://127.0.0.1/debian stable Release
Ign:4 http://127.0.0.1/debian stable/m
Hi,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2020-03-09 06:47:49)
> Johannes 'josch' Schauer (2020-03-09):
> > Package: debootstrap
> > Version: 1.0.120
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > steps to re
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.120
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
steps to reproduce:
$ sudo debootstrap --variant=minbase stable debian-stable
[...]
$ echo $?
100
It works for unstable though.
Thanks!
cheers, josch
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bull
Hi,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2019-08-15 16:44:05)
> > Version 2.29.2-3 was released more than two years ago. It was brought up on
> > debian-devel here:
> >
> > https://lists.debian.org/20170726081846.ga22...@fatal.se
>
> Well, debian-devel@ isn't where one files bug reports against packages tha
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2019-08-15 15:50:03)
> > The script /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests calls the `umount` utility
> > which resides in the mount package. But os-prober does not depend on mount
> > and thus one might get this error message:
> >
> > Generating grub configuration file ...
>
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.76
Severity: important
Hi,
The script /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests calls the `umount` utility
which resides in the mount package. But os-prober does not depend on
mount and thus one might get this error message:
Generating grub configuration file ...
Found lin
Hi all,
Quoting Philipp Kern (2019-06-23 15:14:34)
> On 2019-06-21 07:51, Trek wrote:
> >> If _apt deserves a special solution, I would suggest assigning the
> >> _apt user a static uid instead of patching debootstrap.
> > it seems to me the simplest approach, from a technical point of view,
> > a
ently:
"File not found /dtbs/4.17.0-1-armmp/bcm2837-rpi-3-b-plus.dtb".
For a more detailed log, you can look at
https://salsa.debian.org/freedombox-team/freedom-maker/issues/139.
Thanks a lot in advance,
Johannes
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:39:57 +0200 Johannes Schauer wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:12:16 -0700 Ben Longbons wrote:
> > Now that the kernel supports user_namespaces(7), it should be possible to
> > debootstrap in them. Some small changes are needed.
> >
>
Hi,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-24 20:23:25)
> Julien Cristau (2016-09-12):
> > This is a transient situation because some Essential packages'
> > dependencies changed. I'd consider this a bug in the archive, not in
> > debootstrap.
> Any reasons to keep this bug report open then? Seen no o
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.74
Followup-For: Bug #820838
I've tested the patch. The initrd stanza generated is not totally correct:
іnitrd /boot/intel-ucode.img^/boot/initramfs-linux-pf.img
(note the ^ where there should be a blank)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers tes
Hi James,
Quoting James Clarke (2016-12-23 16:27:02)
> Josch, I'm curious as to why you tagged the corresponding sbuild bug report
> (Cc'd) as unreproducible; are you using debootstrap from stable?
I did not anticipate that I would have to first re-create my existing Stretch
chroot to be able to
Package: os-prober
Version: 1.71
Severity: normal
On Arch Linux, the processor microcode comes as an additional initrd, so that
two initrds have to be called in the config:
initrd /boot/intel-ucode.img /boot/initramfs-linux.img
The line generated by os-prober is missing the actual initrd:
in
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 19:40:15 +0200 Sven Joachim wrote:
> Looking at the code in scripts/sid, it is "x_core_install mawk" which
> fails here. The reason is that mawk has not been downloaded,
> debootstrap's limited dependency resolver cannot resolve base-files'
> pre-dependency on awk.
>
> Th
Hi Ben,
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:12:16 -0700 Ben Longbons wrote:
> Now that the kernel supports user_namespaces(7), it should be possible to
> debootstrap in them. Some small changes are needed.
>
> Configuration needed:
> * Kernel 3.8 or later (3.11 recommended)
> * Set the sysctl kernel.unprivil
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.81
Severity: normal
Hi,
in Debian, every binary package implicitly depends on all binary
packages marked as Essential:yes and every source package implicitly
build-depends on the binary package build-essential. Policy §4.2 says:
| it must be possible to build t
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:55:14 +0100 Brian Drummond
wrote:
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
> 0) Okay, this will be embarrassing...
> 1) Occasional need to work on i386 software on an x8
Hi,
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:20:32 +0100 Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> > debian-installer-netboot-images currently violates Debian Policy by
> > fetching debian-installer images over the network during install - see
> > bug#807168.
> >
> > I believeù that debian-installer
scr.cubox-i
>
> but according to Vagrant Cascadian (in CC) that should work.
Yeah, that should be ok.
Sorry for the noise!
johannes
Package: flash-kernel
Version: support HummingBoard
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Just add the following to the database:
Machine: SolidRun HummingBoard Dual/Quad
Kernel-Flavors: armmp
DTB-Id: imx6q-hummingboard.dtb
Boot-Script-Path: /boot/boot.scr
U-Boot-Script-Name: bootscr.cubox-i
Required-Pack
Hi,
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:41:23 + MegaBrutal wrote:
> I thought to build a Debian chroot in an LXC container, but it fails. From
> the debootstrap.log it turns out, debootstrap tries to create devices with
> MAKEDEV, but it fails with "Operation not permitted". I run debootstrap under
> root
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:20:14 +0100 =?utf-8?q?R=C3=A9mi_Duraffort?=
wrote:
> For this reason, I patched debootstrap so it can create a rootfs using PRoot.
> This rootfs is then used for validating software in debian environment. Be
> careful that this new rootfs will not have the normal right
Hi,
On Fri, 29 May 2015 00:34:18 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Helmut Grohne (2015-05-28):
> > You may be aware that libdebian-installer is considered transitively
> > build-essential.
>
> I wasn't.
If one wants to build build-essential from scratch without relying on packages
from the archiv
Hi,
I'm trying to get a stable preseeding setup to setup my default partitioning
scheme, which is:
1) clear /boot
2) random-key encrypted /tmp
3) random key encrypted swap
4) everything else in a PW encrypted btrfs partition (/)
The preseeding file (where it matter) currently looks as follow, bu
Hello,
I put together the following script to make a custom netinstall iso
(stable), whic is supposed to include the non-free firmware as well as
execute in an preseeded manner. The resulting installer (on an usb stick)
boots just fine after being made like "isoprep.sh original_netinst.iso
/de
Hello,
My personal systems follow the following partitioning scheme:
1) /boot (ext2)
2) /tmp (random key-encrypted ext2)
3) SWAP (random key-encrypted)
4) everything else (password encrypted, BTRFS)
I'm contemplating to start maintaining/document installation suing
preseeding and was wondering w
Package: installation-reports
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
I tested the Jessie Alpha 1 release of the installer by installing it on an old
laptop of mine (a toshiba tecra a9).
The installation finished successfully, leaving a functional debian system.
Only the driver for my wifi-ca
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.55
Severity: normal
Running debootstrap under Debian Sid yields:
$ fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap --verbose --variant=fakechroot sid debian-sid
[...]
I: Installing core packages...
W: Failure trying to run: chroot /home/josch/debian-sid dpkg --force-depends
--i
Hi,
Am Montag, 3. Dezember 2012, 17:43:03 schrieb Brian Potkin:
> On Mon 03 Dec 2012 at 11:08:00 +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
> > As I was not concentrated during the disk partitioning process, the
> > partition manager wanted to use my USB flash drive used for booting the
> &
to file a bug report on this.
Thanks for your kind attention,
Johannes
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB flash drive
Image version: debian-wheezy-DI-b4-amd64-netinst.iso
Date:
Machine: Acer Travelmate 8371
Partitions:
DateisystemTyp
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: Debian Wheezy Beta3 Installer
Date: 2012-11-04
Machine: ASUS M5A88-V EVO
Processor: AMD Athlon IIx4 (640)
Memory: 16 GB
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+squeeze3+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
When using this preseed file:
http://mister-muffin.de/debian/preseed.txt
after the "Install the base system" step this appears and interrupts the
installation, prompting for user input:
http://mister-muffin.de/p/
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
I succesfully installed Debian without any problems.
I chose Guided, encrypted hard drive, one partition
With the same image from two days ago i had two problems, which are now both
fixed,
1) #640943
2) Installation
unfortunate, because I
need to use the unencrypted boot partition in order to get a bootable system.
My computer is a dell latitude e6420 laptop.
Thanks,
Johannes
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, &#
Dear all,
I'm struggling to install Debian Testing alongside OSX (Lion; chainloading
rEFIt/grub2) on my recent MacBook Pro. rEFIt is installed and I shrunk OSX
(using Bootcamp) to 200 of the 750 available gigs. Whenever I go through
debian's installation process and partition the available 550g
Package: keyboard-configuration
Version: 1.68
Severity: normal
hi,
when installing keyboard-configuration on a system without the initscripts
package
installed I get the following error:
Setting up keyboard-configuration (1.72) ...
insserv: Service mountkernfs has to be enabled to start servic
Hi,
Tried in vain in #debian-boot, so here again ...
Is this possible/desirable:
1) Create a physical volume for encryption, which uses a random key.
2) Create a lvm setup within 1), whcih contains logical volumes for tmp and
swap.
Would that work? Would the system at boot time (with a new rand
Hi,
Tried in vain in #debian-boot, so here again ...
Is this possible/desirable:
1) Create a physical volume for encryption, which uses a random key.
2) Create a lvm setup within 1), whcih contains logical volumes for tmp and
swap.
Would that work? Would the system at boot time (with a new rand
hines to not have any kind of sound.
Why would snd-aoa ever be "force fed"? It can and will load
automatically on all machines it supports. Am I missing something?
johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
ding to http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/snd-aoa
>
> I am CC'ing Johannes, he may help us solve that long standing problem.
And what _is_ the problem? AFAIK snd-aoa should work on all machines
that it's auto-loaded on by the kernel.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello :)
Colin has a good point, but so do you.
If you have time though, you could always check if this problem exists
for other file systems and other parameters, as it might do.
Keep working with Debian guys, the end result is really good!
Regards,
Johannes Lundberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
access to your Windows system. I
hope you will be able to restore all your personal data.
Best regards,
Johannes Ranke
* Diego de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071219 13:20]:
>
> Package: installation-reportsBoot method: <4.0 r1 "Etch" - Official i386
> BC Binary -
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20070308
Preseeding from NetInstCD (4.0 R0 07.04.2007) with Floppy stops at Section
"apt-setup" asking about network-mirror.
If "d-i apt-setup/use_mirror boolean true" then installer dont ask anymore
and goes thru.
Only one Option is given in current Docum
4 does not end on cylinder boundary.
Partition table entries are not in disk order
Stick cannot be formatted by cfdisk, but fdisk does the job.
HTH,
Johannes
I downloaded the file twice, 15.0 MB; same result.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Sata atapi cd-rom is supported by the 2.4 kernel
that is also available for sarge. So it is possible to install sarge on
such hardware (There were other issues, so we decided to go for etch,
but sarge worked fine with 2.4 on our laptop).
Maybe someone could update the wiki? thanks!
Johannes
Package: hw-detect
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dennis de Vaal reports that on an iMac G5
"The snd-powermac module causes the system to completey lockup/freeze."
Also, snd-powermac is being deprecated for anything that has a
i2s-X/sound/layout-id. The iMac G5 should have that, and that means
s
Package: installation-reportsBoot method: CD Daily BuildImage version: 26.05.2006Date: 27.06.2005 13:00 CESTMachine: HomemadeProcessor: Geode NX 1750Memory: 384MB DDR
Partitions: Output of lspci and lspci -n::00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333]:00:01.
I tried later releases of d-i, and the problem seems to be gone.
So, out of the door with Sarge I say! :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
such strange entries like:
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 .
I hope that helps and you can fix the bugs so that such strange
Hardware like Motorola PowerStacks are supported by Debian, too ;)
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Package: partman-reiserfs
Version: 20040515
Flagging a reiserfs filesystem as usrquota/grpquota causes mount to fail
if the kernel doesn't have reiserfs quota support, which the
2.6-kernel in the new Debian Installer doesn't have (version 2.6.5-1).
This problem does probably exist for other files
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta3, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux zoidberg 2.6.3-1-k7 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:39:50 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004/04/17, 01:15 am
Method: Booted from CD, tried neti
ized file type' error after fetching
the packages from the debian mirror (any).
The 'daily-build' installer does not provide a 'net'
install at the lilo prompt.
Right now there is no way to get a sarge system on
this machine.
regards,
johannes
--
Johannes Behr <[EMAIL
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 19:02, Joey Hess wrote:
> Johannes Behr wrote:
> > OK, works better --- but still not through.
> >
> > boot, network/DHCP setup, loading of installer components from
> > a mirror works.
> >
> > The hardware-detection process does no
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 19:02, Joey Hess wrote:
> Johannes Behr wrote:
> > OK, works better --- but still not through.
> >
> > boot, network/DHCP setup, loading of installer components from
> > a mirror works.
> >
> > The hardware-detection process does no
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 20:07, Joey Hess wrote:
> Johannes Behr wrote:
> > In the 'beta 2' version I could just start a 'net'
> > install right at the lilo boot prompt.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/mini.iso
> (3 mb)
OK, w
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 21:54, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Johannes Behr wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:36, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> >> On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, G
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:36, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
>
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:37, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> > > >
> > > &g
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
