On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 18:40, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Matthias Murra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 17:17]:
> > It's certainly not lvm's fault if the installer screwed up a bit,
> > so yes, this bug probably can be closed -- or reassigned to the
>
>
On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 16:18, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
>
> Ah, so you did pvcreate on it (or the installer did), then did mkfs
> over that? I can imagine that would have an odd effect on the LVM
> metadata!
The installer seems to have done that, yes. I thought the installer's
behavior was prett
On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 14:24, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> Hang on, there's an alarm bell that I've not been heeding.
>
> Looking in the code: "Incorrect metadata area header checksum" is a
> fatal error.
>
> If that's is occurring on one of tour PVs then the VG should not
> activate.that leads me
On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 08:22, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
>
> Well, if things seem to be working OK, I wouldn't worry too much
> about it! I would have expected vgchange to fail if the MDA
> checksums were wrong but it seems not.
>
> In the meantime can you send me a vgdisplay output and a
> pvdispl
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 18:12, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:54:38PM +0200, Matthias Murra wrote:
>
> You probably shouldn't need to reinstall. Upgrading the tools
> should either fix it automatically, or you can do
> vgcfgbackup/vgcfgrestore to rewr
On Fri, 11 Jun, 2004, at 17:25:25 +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 03:10:18PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-11 06:19]:
> > > > In any case, can you type:
> > > > vgchange -a y
> > > > and restart the partitioner; then
6 matches
Mail list logo
