On Montag, 21. Juni 2004 18:40, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Matthias Murra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 17:17]: > > It's certainly not lvm's fault if the installer screwed up a bit, > > so yes, this bug probably can be closed -- or reassigned to the > > So what exactly did the installer do? From what I can see, you > created some LVM devices, but they were "inactive" so the installer > didn't see them. I've no idea why they'd not be active right after > creating them and I cannot reproduce this.
Please consider that this is more than two weeks ago, so I am not entirely sure what exactly I did to cause this. It may very well have been me screwing up. :-) I just remember that it took me several turns to get the partition and lvm scheme right, and that I thought that the installer could use some brushing up in this area, like telling me right away that I could not assign / to an lvm volume, forcing me to redo the whole thing, which, one way or another, seems to have caused this little mess of mine. Since I don't have another computer on my hands where I intend to unleash the Sarge installer on right now, and because I'm on my way to the LinuxTag anyway, I'm not in a position to try to reproduce this myself at the moment. I'm sorry, but this is all I can contribute to this matter right now. If you cannot reproduce this "error", fine. It probably was me who made the error. Just close this bug and we're all happy -- it's definitely not worth delaying the Sarge release for. ;-) Regards, Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
